"These people are not satisfied with Civil Unions.”
Nor should they be. Imagine if your wife was taken to the hospital and admitted. You go to see her and they won’t let you in because it’s a Catholic hospital, and your ‘marriage’ was in a protestant church, so you don’t meet their definition of ‘married spouse.’
Civil Unions aren’t in any policy. not for filing taxes, visitation, conjugal visits, loan cosigners, car rentals, school dependent pick-up… But if they’re married, they just walk in to those benefits without 2 million civil lawsuits to prove that unions count as marriage in each instance.
“Of course not, they want to REDEFINE marriage”
This isn’t a redefinition of marriage. it remains, legally, a partnership. If they redefined it, then EVERYONE would have to sue to have the rights at hospitals, schools, Hertz, jails…
“because the intent is to break down long held moral traditions to the point that there is no more resistance in any group toward immorality.”
Nope. They just point out that in a secular society, there’s no secular basis for this discrimination.
“These homosexual groups don't want any rules or traditions to stand in their way....ANYWHERE. They want to remake the system just as much as Obama does.”
Well, not any rules based on anyone’s superstition, no.
“They want their Sodom and Gomorrah and they will eventually get it.”
Now, if you had any LOGICAL argument against the change, you wouldn’t need this dramatic, histrionic, fear-mongering.