The shitpill is awareness of the reality that girls would rather engage in coprophagia than have sex with an incel. It also is the realization that women will reject a man for having small poops. image
The shitpill is awareness of the reality that girls would rather engage in coprophagia than have sex with an incel. It also is the realization that women will reject a man for having small poops. image
At age 71, I am starting to appreciate the harm done by my youthful addiction to PLAYBOY.
It wasn't called sex addiction then but it was. PLAYBOY made me see women as sex objects. That's a cliche but the implications were profound.
When you dehumanize them, you cannot see them for whom they really are.
You are much less likely to succeed because you cannot relate to them as human beings. Men put them on pedestals because they had the keys to sexual "Holy Grail." Whenever we place anything before being true to ourselves, we become its slave. Women want leaders, not slaves. The Illuminati deliberately destabilized male-female relationships by making us behave like homosexuals, focused on appearance & sex.
Born from Cabalism (Satanism,) the Illuminati created Communism, which regards women as sexual utilities. Thanks to feminism, women have exchanged the loving roles of wife and mother for promiscuous sex and meaningless careers.
Hugh Hefner was probably a crypto-Jew. Most of the editors were Jews. The PLAYBOY philosophy was the liberal agenda (Communism): sexual permissiveness, feminism, homosexuality and weaponizing racial minorities to undermine social cohesion.
We cannot underestimate the damage PLAYBOY did. Confined to marriage, sexual intercourse was a sacrament that celebrated a loving bond. Now it is just a bodily function. Sexual depravity is the hallmark of satanic possession.
“Why does this generation have autism and hyperactivity? That is to say, mentally retarded children are in abundance? Adultery, masturbation, homosexuality, porn, if you are addicted to these, I say to you in the name of God… when you get married and have children, there is a high possibility of bearing these type of children. They lead an animal-like life. They copulate like animals. They bear children like animals. Therefore those children also, will be like animals.”
The priest has also claimed he “cured” children of autism with the power of Jesus.
Mahathir Bin Mohamad, former prime minister of Malaysia, in an incendiary tweet on Thursday said that ‘Muslims have a right to be angry and to kill millions of French people for the massacres of the past’.
The 95-year-old Mahathir then went on to state that the through their history the French have killed millions of people, including many Muslims, even as the anger against France seems to be growing in Muslim nations after French President Emmanuel Macron said that Islam was in ‘crisis’.
In a twitter thread posted soon after this news broke, Mahathir also said: "Since you have blamed all Muslims and the Muslims’ religion for what was done by one angry person, the Muslims have a right to punish the French. The boycott cannot compensate the wrongs committed by the French all these years."
Mahathir, who was the Malaysian prime minister till February this year, called the French president ‘very primitive’ and not civilised.
Continuing his tirade on Twitter, Mahathir also said: ‘The dress code of European women at one time was severely restrictive. Apart from the face no part of the body was exposed. But over the years, more and more parts of the body are exposed.’
He further tweeted: ‘Today a little string covers the most secret place, that’s all. In fact, many in the west are totally naked when on certain beaches.’
Here’s the basic thing to understand: there is one kind of sex that is normal, and that is a penis going in a vagina for the purpose of reproduction. If you have a sexual attraction to a child, it is no different than sexual attraction to another man, because it is non-reproductive sex. This is called “paraphilia.”
All of the following are defined as “paraphilia”:
Attraction to the same sex
Attraction to pre-pubescent children
Attraction to animals
Attraction to old women
“Consent” is a spook. No one can explain what it is. It is in theory “agreeing to something,” but then there are all of these ifs and ands.
Mentally ill people can’t “give consent.” This is accepted within consent theory. So, if you say a homosexual is mentally ill – which he obviously is – then how can he consent to sodomy? Homosexuality is obviously a mental illness, as it harms your body. These people get all kinds of diseases, which we know of, but do you know they have to wear buttplugs all the time because they lose control of their bowels? This is choosing to inflict harm on yourself and others in a pathological way, meaning it is the textbook definition of “mental illness.”
I have argued cogently that a woman should never be able to consent to anything, not simply because their decisions are so bad, but because they are psychologically incapable of accepting personal responsibility for their bad decisions. Remember that mother who killed her son recently? She blamed it on her boyfriend. Watch Hillary Clinton talk about the Benghazi scandal, or losing the election for that matter. All she does is go through a list of other people whose fault it was. Now think for a second: have you ever witnessed a woman, ever in your entire life, take personal responsibility for a bad decision they made? I’m talking about in your personal life. Just think about it for a few minutes, go through every horrible thing you’ve ever seen a woman do, and ask if you’ve ever seen one then say “this is my fault and I was wrong.”
According to our definition of homosexuality, (i.e. promiscuity outside of love and/or procreation), all pornography is gay. The porn consumer is engaged in a promiscuous masturbatory fantasy. He is not focused on his marriage and progeny.
From what I have said, it should be clear that homosexuality is incompatible with heterosexuality, just as promiscuity is incompatible with monogamy. Gay activists admit their goal is to destroy heterosexuality.
Pornography is poisoning heterosexuality. There is a place for tasteful nudity as a stopgap while seeking marriage.
(See my "Managing the Male Sex Drive" ) But as you know, pornography has reached epidemic proportions. "Adult Video News" predicts revenue of $12.6 billion this year. The Internet has literally thousands of porn sites. TV and pop music increasingly are pornographic.
Pornography warps the way a man sees all women and girls. Many sites include girls as young as 14. See "Erototoxins"
Young females think they are useful for one thing only. Thousands in the porn industry display what everyone has instead of cultivating what is rare and valuable: femininity and the qualities sought in a wife and mother.
I hate to burst the bubble on a billion-dollar industry: Young naked women are practically identical. They have identical equipment. Boobs and bush. Symmetrical faces. Do men need to see literally thousands of examples?
There is something addictive here. Why don't men get sick of it? Why don't they suffer from gynecologist's fatigue? The plethora of breasts and splayed legs takes the wonder out of sex and causes contempt for women and impotence. Maybe this is the point: new drugs keep people running on empty. (See "The Porn Pharma Complex")
[DeAnna] Lorraine and [Alex] Jones repeatedly referred to Michelle Obama as “Big Mike” as they suggested that she is really a man or possibly pretending to be a man as part of a “psy op.”
“Do I think she has a swinging you know what?” Lorraine said. “Maybe. I think she might. I think she might, but it does look suspicious.”
“There’s videos of her where she looks like she’s got a flaccid eight-inch rubber snake in her pants,” Jones replied. “We’re talking like a foot-and-a-half long thing. She’s adjusting it. It’s flopping around. It’s halfway to the knee. And the word is, you know, she’s pitching, he’s catching.”
Later in the program, Lorraine insisted that “elites” like Bill Gates “seem like they have very manly looking wives,” which prompted Jones to asset that Gates may be a woman, or possibly an alien.
“These aliens, and I think that’s what they are—I don’t get into like flying saucers. As a human, my first thing is that’s not a human,” Jones said. “There’s something wrong with these people.”
“There’s something very, very wrong with these people,” Lorraine responded. “It’s from the inside out. I think when they trade, they make a deal with Satan that we’re going to do some satanic work here on Earth—they’re exchanging their soul for it.”
[on a trans woman discussing suicidal thoughts]
I'm a dude and nothing sounds worse than slipping into a necrotic meat cavern.
Cute but, kill yaoi fangirls? That's...sick. Like, the bad sick.
.-. Seriously, there's no reason to kill us for liking something you don't.
But its those rapid fans who try to force us to like it. And then they even cross the line by making straight characters gay for their own enjoyment. And one even called me a Homophobe for not enjoying yaoi and not getting turned on by it.
The reemergence of regressive norms
Recently, there has been a resurgence in sexist attitudes towards women. The liberation, which was in full swing in the '70s has declined and is steadily going downwards. I will note down a few misogynistic trends gaining steam again:
BDSM: Female sexual slavery and masochism are paraded around as empowering. The pathetic reality is women are encouraged to consent to it. Empowerment too has been twisted to fit male sexual fetishes. And many women do believe all this crap. The rising number of female submissives promoting 24/7 BDSM lifestyle on social media shows how brainwashed women have become by liberal bs.
TradWives: Women who submit, serve and spoil their husbands. Or, to be more clear, women who choose to do all this. Women who believe their place is within a home. And many derive satisfaction in being chained to men and kids. The baffling aspect of patriarchy is that women are its greatest supporters.
Makeup: Faking for the sake of men, is again, an 'empowering' choice. By actively discouraging women from being comfortable in their own skin, beauty industry is reaping massive fortunes under the veil of liberal, lipstick feminism.
These are the things on the top of my mind. Feel free to add more below.
Basically, I can conclude that mainstream feminism is a pathetic joke.
As American women, many of us have an idea of what feminists are; freelancing women with all the sexual freedom in the world. But this is exactly the problem with American feminism; it is all about sex and the liberation of our bodies. Certainly, things like abortion and contraception is a part of that freedom, but in today’s society the fight has taken on a much different tone.
Hip Feminist campaigns like Free the Nipple only encourage a gullible behavior of disrespect for our own bodies, leading to everyone else around us disrespecting our bodies as well. If we want to be respected as women and taken seriously in all our endeavors we should look to a new source; Muslim women. Muslim women, as well as Muslim men, see every body as a sacred temple, especially the female body. Opposed to exposing themselves, it is through modesty. When we think of modern feminists we should stray away from the new American trends and start looking to what we have always thought as a contradiction; Muslim feminists.
Woman who wear hijab have freed themselves from a man’s and a society’s judgmental gaze; the Free the Nipplers have not. They have fallen deep into the man’s world, believing that this trend will garner respect.
So I urge my Free the Nipple gal pals to take a look at your Muslim sisters and collaborate with them to create a feminism that treats the female body as a temple and not as a toy. Let us see feminism in a different light—through modesty and the courage to savor our sugar. Let us call on the Muslim feminists of the world.
I am not here for romance. I am not here for sex. I am here to organize on a purely Maoist basis. I will never interact with anyone outside of a Maoist realm.
Engaging in Maoism to pick up women is predatory and deceitful. Sex, romance, lust; these acts of evil detract from the revolution. We should be purely for Protracted Peoples War! I have never been in any romantic relationship! I will never! I am fully geared for revolution!
In a society dominated by the patriarchy, sexual intercourse is unscientific and useless.
I don't think people realize that porn, sex, any sexual promiscuity, etc will be outlawed under communism. All idealist horse shit.
Yeah, it was NEVER about that. You just sucked down every drop of zionist propaganda force-fed to you by the public school system. Prior to Hitler, JEW bankers had basically destroyed Germany through USURY (a term you should become familiar with). Berlin was rife with prostitution, pornography, pedophilia etc. It was a festering wound, A disgusting filthpot thanks to the JEWS. Sounds a lot like the USA now. Degeneracy, communism, force-fed miscegenation, misandry, all brought to you by the JEWS once again. Thye NEVER stop. They are the destroyers of everything GOOD. There was always a reason for them being booted out of 108 countries. It wasn’t because they were humanitarians I can assure you that. Either way no document has ever been uncovered about any holocaust whatsoever. Stephen SpeilBERG would have you believe other wise
During my years active and before, I've noticed a lot of Double Standards committed by the left. All of them are aimed towards what we love, ranging from American traditions to entertainment such as Anime.
For example, it’s OK to attack Donald Trump with false evidence of crimes, yet ignore the crimes Obama has committed along with Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.
Threatening and degrading strong and accomplished Republican women like Melania Trump, Nikki Haley, and Elise Stefanik, while covering for evil and corrupt women like Clinton, AOC, and Nancy Pelosi
Making desecrating the American flag “legal” while making flags of tyrannical countries/terrorist groups, North Korea, Iran, Libya, ISIS, etc “illegal”.
Forcing people into changing heterosexual characters into homosexual characters while attacking the former of being “homophobic”.
Going after innocent people and accuse them of “rape” while the actual pedophiles and sexual predators get off scot-free.
Having female characters in anime, video games, fan-art, etc covered up while allowing male characters to go half-naked.
Fictional characters posing nude/swimwear is forbidden while vore, rape, quicksand, etc is allowed.
Attacking Political/Military Thriller stories (both actual & fan-made) as “Right-wing Propaganda” while promoting “Leftism” in stories.
Attacking our country as an authoritarian regime, while excusing the actions of Islamic dictatorships, foreign drug and human trafficking cartels, and the communist regime in China.
This only shows the hypocrisy committed by the Radical Left, using their tactic to attack both Conservative and Independent individuals while promoting their own ideas in entertainment and the mainstream media. We must stand up against them if we wish to be allowed to explore freely without any trouble.
Pakistan’s prime minister, Imran Khan, is facing backlash after he blamed victims of rape for wearing “very few clothes”.
Speaking to Axios about the “rape epidemic” in Pakistan, he made comments that led to huge criticism from women’s rights groups. He said: “If a woman is wearing very few clothes, it will have an impact on the man unless they are robots. It’s common sense.”
Reacting to his statement, more than a dozen women’s rights groups, including the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, released a statement demanding an apology. “This is dangerously simplistic and only reinforces the common public perception that women are ‘knowing’ victims and men ‘helpless’ aggressors,” they said.
Meanwhile, Maryam Nawaz, the vice-president of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz and daughter of the former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, said Khan was a “rape apologist” and that people who validated rape had the same mindset as the perpetrators.
Kanwal Ahmed, a campaigner for women’s rights, tweeted: “Makes my heart shudder to think how many rapists feel validated today with the prime minister backing their crime.”
And weekend protests have been organised in the cities of Karachi and Lahore.
It comes after Khan was accused of “baffling ignorance” earlier this year after he advised women to cover up to prevent rape. At the time, his team said his comment had been misinterpreted.
Speaking to Axios, he said these comments were “nonsense” and claimed he was referring to Islam’s “concept of purdah” which is to “avoid temptation of society”, often done through covering oneself.
( TerfSedai )
I was just thinking the other day that men always want to enter women's spaces, but how come the human pups never want to attend doggie daycare!?
( llkit )
Believe me it could be much much worse.
( Only_Women_Are_Women )
When they are actually having sex with animals and children as they march along. If we don't have a MASSIVE pendulum swing back to reality soon, by 2030 I'm sure the age of consent will be 12, tops, and sex with all animals will be legal.
Instead of "emotional support animals" men will be allowed in public with "sexual support dogs" -- and total nuclear annihilation of the planet will be the best choice.
They are now introducing a great deal of anime porn into the internet matrix.
Dragon Ball Z is one of the top issues here.
They are sexualizing cartoon characters to push a depraved agenda on our kids.
What’s next? Where will it end?
The VAGINA is a liberal organ of Satan, present in all females after the FALL OF MAN, that exists to to seduce unwittingly stupid men into vile abominations unto the LORD. However, in Western culture, this evil organ is somehow given godlike status and has prompted numerous individuals into hysteria regarding the exalted status of this filthy body part. Matthew 7:18 says, “A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.” It is objectively verifiable that since this corrupt organ does evil while sinners think it does good, the evil fruits are what it produces.
LIBERALS like to think that society should talk more positively about this disgrace to God’s kingdom, citing the justification that the entire body is wonderful, and righteousness and self control are obsolete. Romans 12:1 clearly says that “I beseech ye therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.” Therefore, highlighting and focusing on the worst part of the anatomy is not what God intended.
LINCOLN, Neb. (Nebraska Examiner) — Officials with the Seward and Adams Central school districts on Monday labeled as “ridiculous” and “an ugly rumor” talk that students have dressed up as cats and dogs and have requested litter boxes to handle their bathroom needs.
A spokeswoman with the Millard Public Schools also said she was unaware of anything of that nature happening in that Omaha area district.
The districts were contacted by the Nebraska Examiner after State Sen. Bruce Bostelman of Brainard spoke on the floor of the State Legislature on Monday, saying he was “shocked” that schoolchildren have been allowed by school officials to dress up as “furries,” interacting with teachers using meows and barks, and requesting litter boxes.
“How is that sanitary?” Bostelman asked. “How can schools allow this to happen?”
Later, on Monday afternoon, the senator said he and Fremont Sen. Lynn Walz, the head of the Legislature’s Education Committee, had contacted several schools and found the talk to be untrue.
“We wanted to put an end to it,” Bostelman said, after his earlier speech was widely shared.
Earlier Monday, Bostelman had said he had even heard from some Millard-area parents that a student, dressed as a cat, had asked for a litter box, and when that request was denied, had defecated on a floor.
When asked what schools he was referencing, Bostelman said Omaha and Seward, adding that he had talked to some parents from Millard at a meeting over the weekend who related the story about the furry cat. Hastings Sen. Steve Halloran said he has also heard it was a problem at Adams Central schools in his district.
[Image Macro says “Just because they say they’re a Man or Woman of God, doesn’t mean they are”; make sure you court the one who lines up to God’s word. If they’re not right with God, they’re not right for you!]
Anyone can tell you anything, but actions speak louder than words! #courtinggodsway #doitgodsway #waitongodsbest #waitongod #virgins #virginsquad #virginityrocks #virginityiscool #virginlife #virginlivesmatter #celibate #celibacylife #celibacy #abstinencetillmarriage #abstinence #manofgod #womanofgod #nosex #nosexlife #abstainfromsex #alignyourselfwithgod #righteousliving #abstinenceinspiresmillions #godwordistruth #jesuslovesyou #honorgodwithyourbody
RE: Why do feminists love bdsm and sex work so much?? How someone can be this brainwashed to not see that this is opressive to women??
I don't understand how women can want to be beaten and degraded and dominated by men. Do they really hate themselves that much? Do they consciously view themselves as inferior, or is it all subconscious? How can you date a man who beats you and calls you filthy names and believe that the same man actually loves and respects you? I just don't get it. And most of the women who are into this shit weren't raised watching men beat women. So they have no excuse, in my opinion. Abuse survivors are one thing. But the women who were never hurt or touched by anyone in childhood or adolescence have zero excuse to encourage others to abuse them and call it fun and normal and healthy.
Women in BDSM do not automatically get assigned some passive role by the BDSM community.The disparity is somewhere else: more people prefer passive roles. To understand BDSM you'd have to first acknowledge that this is an affinity to certain sensations people experience involuntarily. I've whipped both men and women, and - apart from minor physiological differences - both react similar and both physically and mentally ENJOY what I do. As long as you view BDSM as an extension of abuse or rape, instead for what it is, you actively keep yourself from any chance of understanding it.
Given that these are your beliefs, I don't see how you can consider yourself a radical feminist. That's all I've got to say.
Why would me being a BDSMer negate my radical feminism? The radical feminism I live, respects the aspects of people they can't and need not change. I can't change the fact that I am female any more than I can change the fact that I am a BDSMer.
I mean, radical feminism opposes what you are doing. I don't want to get into some big argument about whether you were born that way because I highly doubt you could be convinced otherwise, but the stripe of feminism you're claiming to follow doesn't match with that belief.
Sex is ubiquitous in today's western world. Sexual promiscuity is not only condoned but encouraged. Some argue that this is just the way things are naturally supposed to work. Actually though, this wasn't the case for a long time. People actually invested little time and resources dealing with sex. It was pretty much took for granted. Most people would eventually become of age, seek a partner through networking in communities (a small village, the church etc.), get married and that was pretty much it. They'll eventually move on to deal with less worldy and animal-like aspects of life rather than sex. It would play a small part in the rest of their existence, and mainly for reproductive reasons.
Ironically this glorification of sex happens in a time where many people are having less sex than their ancestors used to (there are many studies you probably already know, I'll just link one)
By the way this is absolutely consistent with modern sexual dynamics, since of course when a resource is scarce, it becomes fetishized.
This mechanism also features a key characteristic of capitalism, which is unequally allocating resources: on one hand you have attractive people who are so awashed with sex, and take so much pride in succeeding at something so glorified by society, that they make it one of their main focus in life; then you have normies who delude themselves into thinking they'll eventually get to live the same life as attractive people if only they try hard enough and invest enough time/money; and finally on the other spectrum we have incels who are completely deprived of sex, and thus end up making something so worldly, something they were supposed to take for granted, their main source of pain, misery and motivation (or more often, lack thereof)
Quoting from Marx's "Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844" regarding the estrangement of labor in the factory based system of production:
As a result, therefore, man (the worker) only feels himself freely active in his animal functions – eating, drinking, procreating, or at most in his dwelling and in dressing-up, etc.; and in his human functions he no longer feels himself to be anything but an animal. What is animal becomes human and what is human becomes animal.
Certainly eating, drinking, procreating, etc., are also genuinely human functions. But taken abstractly, separated from the sphere of all other human activity and turned into sole and ultimate ends, they are animal functions.
There's only a finite amount of resources (time, money, intellectual capabilities) one can dedicate to a given number of activities. If a mundane activity such as sex ends up absorbing a hefty share of them (either because you're good at it and like indulging in it, or because you can't get any and won't stop brooding about it) there will be less resources to dedicate to something else (e.g. questioning the status quo)
Obviously we now live in a post-industrial society. People are now consumers first, rather than producers. Capitalism has thus switched from exploiting labor, to exploiting consumption. This is where the commodification of sex comes into play. Sex being promoted, advertised, fetishized, and unequally distributed just like any other commodity, only broadens the spectrum of consumption, and the broader it gets, the more there is for capitalism to exploit.
Labor -> Consumption -> Sex.
As a consequence, stemming from the estrangement of labor, WE CAN RIGHTFULLY TALK OF ESTRANGEMENT OF SEX as the main tool to degrade mankind.
What is animal becomes human and what is human becomes animal.
[A picture of Karl Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and then Elliot Rodger]
It has been some time since I posted on the Furry Fandom sect. I have written 17 articles that are prequels to my forthcoming book, Fake Fandom. I am a very busy person, older, and trying to redeem wasted years, so, I pick my projects carefully.
The big struggle with this project was the Furry motif, which exudes harmlessness while the extreme opposite is true; this is a deeply evil and dangerous sect, particularly for children. It is the epitome of a Trojan horse.
The similarities in dealing with Furries and my experience researching cults and spiritual tyranny are uncanny. Furries, exactly like spiritual tyrants, attempt to control their adversaries through condemnation. If you can destroy a person’s self-esteem (a truthful self-assessment) and self-confidence, you can control them. Present Furry attacks on me are, therefore, very familiar and attacks I have been dealing with for more than ten years.
And remember, when people attempt to condemn you through various and sundry accusations, the catalog comes from their own life. They accuse you of faults they are familiar with because they are guilty of those faults themselves. What people accuse you of is a window into their own lives when the goal is to neutralize you through condemnation. Since they don’t know you, they must choose accusations they are familiar with.
FYI, even if everything they are hounding me with is true, I am still going to publish the book and let the folks decide. I have stopped responding to the attacks and are merely compiling the rants for data purposes. These misfits are emailing me with, on average, four different aliases, and even posing as researchers from other countries. It is a completely unhinged mosaic.
Hopefully, the book will aide child advocates where applicable. Presently, when Furries come up in situations regarding children, the issue is dismissed as irrelevant. Even Dr. Phil McGraw deems the sect as a “hobby.” This view of Furries flows from a stunning ignorance that supplies cover for imminent danger to children.
In considering the threat level, I was on the fence for some time, but thanks to the many who have contacted me with information and offers to assist in research, I now understand the depth of this threat. I look forward to working with them to warn others.
Transgender ideology is a loose catch-all term referring to philosophies, world views, and dogmatic statements adhered to by political activists who see themselves as trying to uphold the human rights of transgender people. The political movement of furthering these ideologies is called the transgender movement. Feminists tend to use these terms critically when pointing out sexist, homophobic, or otherwise problematic aspects of the movement. Those who support the transgender movement tend to oppose the term transgender ideology, likening it to phrases such as homosexual agenda which is used to ascribe a sinister intent to gay/lesbian/bisexual rights activists.
The practice of supporting transgender ideology is called transgender activism (often shortened trans activism) and a person who follows this practice is called a transgender activist (often shortened trans activist). The word "transgender" in the phrase "transgender activist" is not to be understood as an adjective for the person in question (i.e. "an activist who happens to be transgender") but as a reference to the activism they practice (i.e. "an activist supporting transgender ideology"). Many trans activists are not transgender themselves.
The term trans rights activist (shortened TRA) is sometimes used for its similarity to men's rights activist (shortened MRA). Just like so-called MRAs claim to support men's human rights but end up blaming everything on women and opposing feminism, TRAs claim to support transgender human rights but end up blaming everything on women and opposing feminism.
Trans women are women
One of the core dogmata of the transgender movement is the statement that trans women are women (and the less often repeated trans men are men). Under this view it's important to write trans woman as two words (adjective and noun) and not transwoman, to stress the fact that so-called trans women are literally a subtype of women, just like white women, black women, short women, tall women, and so on. The statement "trans women are women" is not meant as a vague slogan of moral support, but in a literal sense.
Since the statement contradicts the dictionary definition of the word "woman" (adult human female), it implies that a different definition would be better. When asked about this, transgender activists usually avoid providing an actual definition. Most attempts tend to revolve around a circular definition, such as "anyone who identifies as a woman, is a woman." As such, the statement "trans women are women" is probably best described as a dogma.
The idea that transwomen are literally women is taken as the basis for many problematic conclusions, such as: transwomen deserve to partake in women's sports, transwomen should be seen as part of the natural dating pool of lesbians (see also cotton ceiling), transwomen deserve to use all female facilities, enter female-only spaces and events, speak on women's rights as women, and so on.
The idea that "trans women are women" is usually backed by a belief in an essential, inborn, and immutable "gender identity" that every person supposedly possesses. Transwomen are said to be real women on the grounds that they possess a "female gender identity" which they are said to share with women. Likewise for transmen and a "male gender identity" that is supposedly shared by all men.
Just like transgender activists refuse to provide an objective definition of womanhood, they tend to refuse defining gender identity on any objective terms. Usually, when explaining how a person has discovered their gender identity, one hears references to sexist stereotypes ascribed to womanhood and manhood. When confronted directly however, transgender activists refuse the notion that gender identity is based entirely on those stereotypes. Since no objective measure exists at all, they are effectively forced to accept the claims of anyone and everyone regarding what their gender identity is. Thus we see transwomen with full beards and intact male anatomy, who are said to be literally real women like any other.
Since gender identity is said to be inborn, it follows that some children would be transgender, and only need to find this out. Once it's found out, the only way forward is to support the child in its transgender identification. This leads to the transgender activist "affirm-only" approach towards youth, where for instance a boy who says "I wish I was a girl" or "I'm actually a girl" is from that point on treated as if the child is literally a girl. (Given a female name, referred to by female pronouns, asked to be considered a girl by others, and so on.) Likewise for girls who express that they wish they were a boy, or claim that they are internally a boy. Trans activists are opposed to the alternative "watchful waiting" approach.
The trans activist affirm-only approach has been supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Parents concerned over this model of treatment published a long criticism and launched a petition reaching 1,200 signatures. Psychologist James Cantor also published a fact-check article criticizing the AAP's decision.
Trans activists usually support giving puberty blocking medication such as Lupron to children who think they are transgender. These children may be as young as 10 years old.
Cisgender people oppress transgender people
Another core tenet of transgender ideology is the notion that cisgender people oppress transgender people, just like how men oppress women, white Americans oppress black Americans, or how straight people oppress gay men and lesbian women. As such, when a man identifies as a transwoman, his position relative to that of a woman turns from being her oppressor to someone who is oppressed by her. His male privilege is denied as he is now considered a woman, and the fact that he is a transgender woman means that he is oppressed by so-called cisgender women. Further, being both a woman and transgender means he is considered to suffer under two axes of oppression, akin to how black women suffer both from racism and sexism. This way, a white man suddenly becomes comparable to a black woman with regards to oppressive power dynamics in society.
As per the principle of intersectionality (appropriated from black feminism), transgender activists often say that the feminist movement should not only include transwomen's concerns, but outright center them in many discussions, as otherwise the feminist movement might fail to sufficiently address their concerns.
Collusion with "sex work" activism
For reasons not entirely clear, many if not most transgender activists also seem to support the "sex work" movement. Possible explanations for this collusion might be:
* Both movements stem from queer ideology, which is based on transgression of social norms without regard to ethical concerns
* The transgender movement being dominated by autogynephilic men who are interested in upholding a society in which women exist for male sexual pleasure
* Anti-feminists supporting both the transgender movement and the "sex work" movement, simply because they see both of them as weapons against women's liberation
I’m a 14 year old. I want to give a commentary on fetishes and how they’ve affected my friends.
I apologize if this post isn’t 100% about AGP. But it is relevant. This has been a point of concern for me for a while and I needed to get it off my chest.
I will say I do think actual trans people exist, I have met some who are normal and nice people. I just think they get over shrouded by all the fetishists out there.
I’ve noticed a lot of my friends and even myself develop fetishes. At first I thought it was normal at age since y’know... puberty but then I saw people like you talking about how it was concerning and I took a look into it.
I used to have a lot of fetishes when I was 12-13, I’ve gotten rid of a majority of them and am trying to get rid of the rest. I’ve noticed my friends are into things and it concerns me a bit.
A have a friend who’s into dragons, which honestly pretty tame when it comes to fetish standards but he’s also being into beaten. One of my other friends is into being tied up.
What really concerns me is my MtF friend. He’s into ABDL, petplay and BDSM... and like me he’s 14...
According to some people we should still have our innocence at this age, or at least have some of it. Out of the many friends I have only 1 has really maintained their innocence. I lost my innocence at age 11. It wasn’t due to anything sexual it was because when I entered middle school, I heard and saw everyone cussing at eachother, being mean to eachother, talking about sex. 5th grade was a happy and friendly enviroment. This wasn’t. I will say 7th grade was probably the best time of my life so far, but that’s a whole other topic.
I feel like we’re growing up a bit too fast. A lot of my friend’s friends have already lost their virginity.
It just feels like something is... wrong. I’m assuming that this kind of stuff isn’t normal. But if yall older folk could confirm or deny it that’d be great. I’d also like to hear your commentary on the situation as well.
EDIT: Aight it 100% not normal as I expected. I also get this weird feeling that people on this sub hate me now but hey that could just be my anxiety talking.
[on /v/ having SFW hentai threads]
Disgusting. Anime and maga and all the other Chinese cartoons need to banned. Nothing would be lost and we all gain the valuable peace of mind which comes from not being exposed to the deviant and depraved mindset of the orientals.
Please do not put up any starry sky M/M pairings utterly sickening and makes me want to throw up then stab you with a knife. I am not a homophobic nor am I close minded. But making straight characters gay is crossing the line. They are meant to be straight so keep it that way and forget about your sickening fantasies.
Would you rather us right a starry sky heterosexual pairing fic? I don't mean to be cheeky...well yes, I do but still. I find it annoying when nitpick on yaoi when it's usually hetero pairings (especially when a girl inserts herself into the story so she can be with her favorite character) that does the starry sky junk.
But again, it's not even just gay pairings you should be pissed off at. ANY pairing that has an ungraceful and trite writing strategy like that is usually asking for some dislikes.
So you're saying all anime should only have male and gay couples? I don't even see what's so attractive about yaoi. The entire logic is warped on the yaoi fandom. How can you love two men when you know they will never love you back because they're gay? It makes no sense to me. It's rather sad than sexy. You can't visualize yourself or your characer with them because they love the same sex. While in normal pairings you can change the girl's image to fit yourself or your character and pair them.
I think gay people deserve all the rights straight ones have, but I wouldn't be too happy if I was gay and had the support of yuri fans. It's kind of like pedophiles supporting little children.
Lots of fans of every kind of fictional relationship don't seem to understand the difference between love and lust. I mean, you can love your S.O, you can love your brother, you can love your best buddy, and it's the same kind of love. But lust is a completely different thing. I have a gay friend who's deeply in love with a girl, and even though he's gay, they have a very sweet and loving relationship. And then I know tons of people who only date thoes who turn them on and think it counts as love.
The majority of slash writers seem to be overly horny kids who think love (or hate...) and lust go hand in hand, and ruin beautiful friendships by making them stick their tongues down eachothers throats and bang eachothers brains out. If JK Rowling decides to write about Harry and Ron crushing on eachother and eventually becoming a gay couple, that's fine and very sweet. But until then, there's absolutely no evidence of any lust, so any yaoi of them gets labeled "sick" by me.
Here I shall express what I believe a sexually moral society would do in case it is confronted with sexual deviants, or perverts, if you don’t want political correctness. Feel free to write in the comments other things such a society would have, and if you have any disagreements, tell me. Anyway, In a sexually moral society, anyone caught doing the act of pedophilia, incest, bestiality, necrophilia, and rape will be sentenced to death, and anyone expressing a desire to do so will be sent to special mental asylums for years. Anyone harboring somone who has done any of these actions or expressed a desire to do so will be punished as well. People who have fetishes, commit sodomy, engage in BDSM, or other acts deemed immoral and perverted will be sent to mental asylums, where therapists and psychologists will assist them. They will be able to leave the asylum, but only in the land surrounding it, which will be a park and a garden. Other anemities may be added around the asylum to make the patients more comfortable. There will be security camera everywhere to make sure they don’t act on their fetish or commit sodomy. Those caught doing so will lose the privilege to go outside until they have shown self-control over themselves. The goal of the mental asylums is to get rid of the patient’s fetish or desire to commit sodomy or BDSM. Patients will stay at the area for as little as 6 months, or as long as 2 years, depending on how they respond to treatment. Once they are deemed free from their fetish, they will be released and integrated back into society. Those caught doing the act of fornication, adultery, pornography, promiscuity, and masturbating excessively with fines or time in a special section of the mental asylum. Frequent violations result in staying at a mental asylum for up to a year. The media will teach the people from birth to shame and reject anyone caught doing any sexually immoral act, and they will be taught not to do sexually immoral acts as well, or else be reprimanded. It will be just like teaching the youth not to steal, bully, or lie. You know, with posters, advertisements, books, and cartoons. Visitors will be told of the rules, and they will face the same punishments if caught doing any sexually immoral act. This is what a sexually moral society would do, so that sexual purity and morality becomes the new norm. Thank you, and have a good day.
This has nothing to do with my religion. I joined the Catholics because they are against homosexuality. I did not become against homosexuality because I joined the Catholics.
There is no need for you to apologize. I am not the one who decided to act unprofessionally, and assault the character of a fellow writer int the field. Mr Hines is. I am not the bigot. Mr Hines is. I believe a certain degree of courtesy and respect is due to comrades, and that other loyalties exist aside from political loyalties: Mr Hines does not.
He is a member of a cult of hate; I am a member of a religion of love. I love mankind, love virtue, love truth, and love beauty to the same degree and with the same intensity that the Hate Cult hates all these things. There is no compromise, no quarter and no peace between us.
PS: Logically, your friend cannot have a 'wife.' Women cannot have wives for the same reason the mother of an orphan cannot be alive. The word refers to someone who forms one half of a sexual dyad.
What your friend has is a desire for her friend to masturbate together with her, which creates sexual sensations without the sex act. The sex act requires mates of the opposite sex to perform. I have no doubt their love is as sincere as a pederast for his underage lover, a sadomasochist for his partner in chains, and so on. The sincerity of the love does not change the unnatural love to a natural one.
The fact that your language is so degraded and debased that you cannot even form a non-paradoxical sentence, that you cannot speak the truth, but instead choose to speak what you know or should know to be nonsense about the matter indicates an alarming lack of mental integrity on your part.
4 days ago
Pornography should become extinct and never be produced again.
3 days ago
I agree, it destroys relationship building, especially at a young age.
3 days ago
It breaks God's heart to see this atrocity occur every day. Sex should only be done by a married man and woman.
Edited 3 days ago
The older I get the more I think casual sex is unhealthy, especially with modern force multipliers like porn, sex toys, and Tinder. I've seen too many "baby's daddies" and "babies mama's" to think it's working out economically and emotionally at that. You'll see an entire American generation that doesn't know half their family, maybe more.
3 days ago
No doubt about it. Casual sex is unhealthy, toxic, illegal, unlawful, and sinful, especially with sexualisation and perversion.
[Based] Bisexuals are the worst type of degenerates
[Screenshot from some crank site titled “SATAN is a TRANSEXUAL”]
"mixing holy with the profane"
think about the word "mixing"
When Adam and Eve were in the garden, he said to them "you shall become like gods, knowing what is good and evil"
yet technically, he told the truth in a way. he mixed truth with deception.
also check out this comment
Being gay means spreading disease. The bisexual chad is the worst type of gay, he has sex with plenty of women, spreading gay diseases to the women that you get from them later. Actual gays just literally fuck each other and die without spreading the problem to normal people.
The left is currently governing the way we SHOULD have. The GOP should have utilized Big Tech to ban pornography and stop the spread of leftism. We should have changed election laws so Democrats never win. And we should have put Jesus Christ back in government.
Blackpill The Cultural & Political Importance Of "Deep Fake" Porn In This Modern Gynocratic Society
Some woman runs to be president next time, someone creates a high quality deepfake porn of her from getting gangbanged and releases it. Its goes viral and she loses the election, because "IT BREAKS THE FUCKING MATRIX"
As a society we all like to pretend like "women are people like men" but deep down we know full well they aren't (and even women know it). Every "professional" "high class" woman who we see in some business suit, later is going to be on her knees submissively choking on dick and being debased in every way possible. This is why having a female boss feels so weird to many men, you know she is submissive, you know her existence is undignified, but due to the mental gymnastics rules of modern society, you have to ignore and push those thoughts to the back of your mind and play along.
You can show me the most high ranking "powerful" feminist screaming in front of a crowd of thousands. Now imagine a high quality deepfake of her getting anal gaped gets blasted right behind her on a big screen that was just spelling out "Woman Power". She's just been fucking neutralized and will scream and even cry: BECAUSE THE ILLUSION WAS BROKEN THE LIES SHE WAS TELLING HERSELF WERE REVEALED SHE KNOWS IT, AND EVERYONE WHO SEES IT KNOWS IT.
EVERYBODY WHO SAW THAT VIDEO WAS JUST BITCH SLAPPED AND TOLD: "No this is women's worth, stop coping, she's going to be doing this later tonight, how is this empowering?. A woman's existence is inherently about submission and debasement, they should never lead anything or have a say in anything of importance"
I have been searching for a wife for years now. God willing, one day I will find her. I already have someone I want, across the street from me, who visits (whom I wrote about toward the last part of 2019 in numerous website articles), but she doesn't want me. I do love her. I keep picking women who don't like me. So what's a man to do? All I can do is keep praying, trying and hoping to find a wife. I signed up for eHarmony. You wouldn't believe some of the hilarious profiles that I read! For example: I couldn't sleep tonight. It is 2:30 a.m. on Sunday. So I went to surf eHarmony's Matches for me. Here is a 38 year old woman named Iris in Chicago who writes:
I am friendly & kind hearted. I don't know why people r afraid 2 approach me. It does not bother me 2 eat pizza everyday. I am not interested in dealing w/ a man obsessed w/ "physical fitness" or "counting calories". I am all 4 improving health, but not in a hitler/commando type style. I am not into sports. I am not a "white glove clean the house daily freak". I know there is a lot 2 chew here already, but would u not want an idea of what a person is all about b 4 deciding to jump in or not?
If you saw her profile photo, you'd believe that she eats 2 pizzas every day!
I’ve actually had a few a*holes tell me that I shouldn’t be on eharmony because I am too fat! Listen… fat people, ugly people, disabled people, even villains want and need love. If voldemort can find love, so can I. I am who I am and your approval is certainly not needed. Public opinion be damned!
I've already contacted her and we're getting married next month...lol. No, I'm just kidding! Iris continues her rant, saying that she wants to find a man, who:
Someone who shares the same interests as me is an absolute must. A chubby chaser is a plus. I want a man who enjoys food and knows what he wants out of life. I am not interested in dealing with a man who has kids [or even wants kids]. Someone would really have to be outside the box [literally] in order to deal with me. My standards may be too high, but I know what I want and I am not willing to settle for less.
I truly feel sorry for this woman. Her attitude is atrocious! She wants to selfishly find a man to fit into her own interests. She wants a man who likes refrigerator-sized women. She boasts of her poor health and clearly plans to stay in poor health, and seeks a man who likes to abuse his health like she does. She doesn't have or want children. She doesn't want to “deal with a man” who has kids? High standards? Lady, your standards couldn't be any lower! She wonders why people are afraid to approach her. Really?
BDSM is NOT Romantic!
You may have heard of the novel and movie “50 Shades of Gray”. One of the lifestyles depicted is the BDSM (Bondage, Domination, Sadism and Masochism). It is sometimes used on transgender girls, and has been depicted throughout the Internet. Some folks even believe that it is romantic. Well, have I got news for you. BDSM IS NOT ROMANTIC!
The BDSM lifestyle is a very abusive lifestyle. Unnecessary restraints, gagging, physical abuse such as spanking, being forced to submit to a master or mistress…that isn’t romantic at all. One would suspect that a master or mistress may have been abused as a child, and want to take their physical anger out on a transgender person. Maybe the transgender person is naive enough to take all of this physical, mental and emotional abuse. It also could be that the master/mistress may have had an inferiority complex or was bullied while growing up. Maybe they were bullies themselves. That person might have served time in juvenile detention or in an adult jail. We should be disturbed when we find that someone’s home has a dungeon built in the basement, designed to unlawfully imprison a person. Tying a person up with ropes, handcuffs or other unnecessary restraints, spanking or even beating that person, forcing that person into sexual situations they’re not ready for or don’t want to be in, and taking away their freedom…these are the hallmarks of an abusive lifestyle.
The BDSM lifestyle also runs afoul of the law. Unlawful imprisonment is illegal in all 50 states. Forcing a person (even a transgender person) to be held against his or her will is against the law. Physically abusing a person using this lifestyle constitutes assault, which is considered a felony in all 50 states. Restraining a person with ropes or handcuffs is also illegal. Many of these masters or mistresses who practice this unhealthy and abusive lifestyle should be ashamed of themselves. They need to seek the help of a qualified psychotherapist before they land themselves behind bars.
If you know a person involved in this lifestyle who is holding a person (especially a transgender person) against his or her will, have evidence of unlawful restraint or physical abuse, don’t be afraid to report it to your local authorities. If you or someone you know has been abused by someone involved in the BDSM lifestyle, seek the help of a qualified psychotherapist at once. The life you save will be your own or that of someone you know.
The BDSM lifestyle is an unhealthy, abusive and harmful lifestyle. More information can be found at the Pornography Harms Web site. Their Web site is http://www.pornharms.com/
THIS IS THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH ABOUT THE UNHEALTHY AND ABUSIVE BDSM LIFESTYLE. There is nothing that can repudiate the honest-to-goodness truth.
[ in response to a man confessing to cheating on his asexual wife with an escort ]
Congratulations. The only thing more pathetic and gross than a dude who cheats on his wife because he's too much of a pussy to divorce her...is a dude who cheats on his wife with a filthy used-up hooker and is stupid enough to pay for it. At least stay away from your wife so she doesn't catch your disgusting STD. Stay classy.
Good point...his wife already figured out how gross he is and won't touch him. That's why he has to pay someone to lower themselves to have sex with him. Hopefully, she divorces him and takes whatever she can.
She needs therapy...you need therapy....not self-therapy but you actually need to go speak to someone and so does she. If you guys are in an ok place to talk, I would talk to her candidly about it and honestly ask her what she needs you to do. Whether that's to turn yourself in...or to tell the family...or whatever she needs. You need to seek redemption from her and put yourself in a position where she can tell you what she now needs you to do so she can move on. After you do that, you'll be able to move on too. But both of you need to get some professional help.
God is mean
Christians are mean
If God real why bad thing happen
Too many religion ;(
Why can’t I look outside and see God
If God is real why do i like to take it up the ass
Out of context Bible verse
Is the subject of the Fandom that far away from TANC’s focus of study? Well, I guess not since there is a “Christian Furry” movement afoot. Actually, the movement has become prominent in the church. Perfect. A match made in heaven for sure.
Like church (Protestantism, in particular), most Furry participants don’t know what they have signed up for. Since most Protestants don’t even know what a Protestant is, the two are perfect for each other. Both put children at risk, and both make excuses for the evil they produce. But, of course, what possible connection could there be between what we read in the papers and Martin Luther saying,
“If you are a preacher of mercy, do not preach an imaginary but the true mercy. If the mercy is true, you must therefore bear the true, not an imaginary sin. God does not save those who are only imaginary sinners. Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong (sin boldly), but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the victor over sin, death, and the world. We will commit sins while we are here, for this life is not a place where justice resides. We, however, says Peter (2 Peter 3:13) are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth where justice will reign.”
A question: would you hire a person with such a worldview to oversee your church security? When people ask me, “Paul, where is justice in the church?” I will often answer, “Martin Luther said there isn’t any justice in this world to begin with.”
Both decry how they are “painted with a broad brush because of a few bad apples.” Meanwhile, children are acceptable collateral damage and less important than reputation. Both of these cultural movements claim the ideology that created them has no bearing on present behavior. The church may have a better argument than the Fandom, but in light of the headlines the church is trying to overcome, the embracing of a movement like the Fandom is stunning. No, no, church isn’t enough of a hot mess; by all means add the Fandom. No additional baggage there at all.
As will be documented in Fake Fandom, the Fandom began as a sexual revolution using anthropomorphic art as a bridge over cultural barriers. The Fandom was, and still is, a counterculture sex cult. Additionally, anthropomorphism and the manga form of Anime art is used to get around child pornography laws. In all, the Fandom is a perfect genre for child grooming.
As explained in the book, all movements will have those along for the ride who don’t understand the dynamics of countercultures, subcultures, sects, and cults, and how core ideology drives any given movement. Yes, some involved in the Fandom, perhaps many, are hobby enthusiasts and unwitting participants. That is a common dynamic of all movements whether religious, political, or anti-humanity.
What does the ready acceptance of the Fandom into church say about church leadership? Typical lack of discernment? Indifference? In what reality would a person with ill intent not see an opportunity with such a program centered around children in the church where ignorant trust knows no bounds? Imagine such a program being considered by dopy people with a silly grin and glassed-over eyes saying in a small, still voice, “We are all just sinners saved by grace” as the wolf inside the wolf suit licks his chops. Yes, one furry, whose persona is a wolf, attacked me for dissing his Furry program at a local church and the “rich fellowship” it creates with children. May I venture to ask if anyone is dressing up in a lamb suit?
Of course, the defense will be made regarding the good works the Fandom does for charity and not everyone in the movement is a pervert. Church has a better defense for itself in that regard, at least theoretically, while we wait for the headlines about child abuse to at least slow down.
Finally, church has an opportunity to demonstrate that it has “learned from unfortunate events” by banning the Fandom. It’s a grand opportunity to show that it is security conscious and a movement like the Fandom poses too much risk. Until the church proves it can keep children safe, it doesn’t need to add a movement with the same problem.
Furries claim to be a mere fandom. That’s it, move on, nothing to see here. What is a fandom? A fandom makes a hobby out of something people are a fan of. It’s very much like a fan club. For example, people who like Ford Mustangs might join a Mustang club or some other kind of car club. I once knew a couple who owned two Huskies and were members of a Husky club. Fan clubs concerning sports figures and movie stars are myriad.
The Furry fandom is a fake fandom; it’s a cover, which is why “fake fandom” will be a major theme of the book I will be publishing on the Furry “fandom.” The introduction will preface the use of ” the Fandom” in the book with the author’s acknowledgment that it is a fake fandom.
Furries like to compare themselves to other fandoms that focus on animation characters and art. “Hey, we are no different than any other club that has a common interest in something; nothing here, get a life and move on.” In the Furries’ avid defense of their sect against my criticism, they are fond of bringing up the Bronies.
Who are the Bronies? Well, they are men who are big fans of the movie, My Little Pony. And, they are very weird. And, they are big into My Little Pony art and other things Pony, but they are not the only fan club that is weird. But, they are a legitimate fandom, and an excellent opportunity to further understand Furryism by comparison and contrast.
As you might suspect, anything that can make a connection of interest between adult men and little girls is bound to be exploited by some, but you have to look hard for actual cases. Most Bronies are young males of the Millennial generation age, which makes sense because the Millennial generation is opposed to what they call, “toxic masculinity.” Many in this fandom tout the benefits of finding their “inner feminine.” In this regard, to some degree, you could argue for Brony ideology, but it isn’t an ideology that drives adverse behavior to any significant degree.
In contrast, decadent, criminal, and adverse behavior by the Furry sect can be found everywhere you point a stick while blindfolded. Bronyism is all about the ponies, but Furyism is about many other things normally not discussed in open settings. Furyism has more baggage than an Amtrak train.
Also, Bronies may use internet handles, but hidden identities are rare. Furries, for the most part, hide their identities. The excuse for that follows: it’s a good idea to hide your identity on the internet because of identity theft. So, if something is a good idea, the motive for doing it is completely irrelevant, right? If the police catch you burglarizing a business in the middle of the night, they should forget the whole thing because you used a penlight to see what you were doing which is a good idea. Hardly. At the beginning of my journalistic journey provoked by a change of leadership at the church I attended years ago, their silly answers and lame excuses told me that there was much more going on than the eyes could see. Once again, I find myself in the same situation.
Nether do Bronies believe they are ponies. In addition, Bronies don’t believe their true identities are found in ponies. As we will see in future posts in this series, Furism has been classified as a mental dissociative disorder by many psychologists.
ISIS is based
gays are degenerate pedos, non penile-vaginal sex is a sin and should be punished greatly
Death to sexual freedom
If you see it that way, no matter if its the muslims, the russians or the chinese who conquere us things stand to improve really
Russians allow deviancy, so do Chinese, Muslims are the only based ones except they are mongrels so they would want to mix everyone and if they do conquer us many non muslim men will be incels because because of shit islamic rule that only male muslims can intermarry with non muslims
I hate all three I want to start a new culture
BK-ash: Absolutely based, I'd unironically join ISIS if killing people wasnt haram
Matthew Vines: What is your answer for gay Christians who struggled for years to live out a celibacy mandate but were driven to suicidal despair in the process?
James White: I reject the category, once again. Matthew, should a “pedophilic Christian” be allowed under-age sex with a willing minor so as to avoid suicidal despair (a documented reality amongst pedophiles)? Should a cross-generational Christian be allowed intimacy with a close relative so as to avoid suicidal despair? Should a trans-species Christian be allowed intimacy with an animal so as to avoid suicidal despair? Should a thieving Christian be allowed to steal so as to avoid suicidal despair? I reject all of these absurd categories, of course—it only shows what happens when you create a category that is morally and ethically neutral or even positive in your own mind and then attempt to create a system based upon that error.
I have exposed this far the level of the Cult conspiracy that operates in the world of the seen and within the global secret society and satanic network which operates in the shadows one step back from the seen.
The 'Covid' hoax is major part of the Cult agenda, but only part, and to grasp the biggest picture we have to expand our attention beyond the realm of human sight and into the infinity of possibility that we cannot see.
It is from here, ultimately, that humanity is being manipulated into a state of total control by the force which dictates the actions of the Cult.
How much of reality can we see...?
Next to damn all is the answer.
We may appear to see all there is to see in the 'space' our eyes survey and observe, but little could be further from the truth. The human 'world' is only a tiny band of frequency that the body's visual and perceptual systems can decode into perception of a 'world'.
The Cult and its non-human masters seek to convince us through the institutions of 'education', science, medicine, media and government that what we are experiencing is who we are. It's so easy to control and direct perception locked away in the bewildered illusions of the five senses with no expanded radar.
The phenomenon of identity politics is a Cult-instigated manipulation technique to sub-divide previous labels into even smaller ones. A United States university employs this list of letters to describe student identity:
LGBTTQQFAGPBDSM or lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, transsexual, queer, questioning, flexual, asexual, gender-fuck, polyamorous, bondage/discipline, dominance/submission and sadism/masochism...
Wokers programmed by the Cult for generations believe this is about 'inclusivity' when it's really the Cult locking them away into smaller and smaller versions of Phantom Self while firewalling them from the influence of their true self, the infinite, eternal 'I'.
God told Hosea to marry a harlot. I don't think Hosea was any different than men today. I think the ole boy got really happy. “Lord, can you say that again?” You heard me Hosea, go marry that pretty worldly gal you've been looking at, Gomer. I think Hosea was very happy, at first, but I sincerely don't think he saw what was coming. After bearing him three children, Gomer forsook Hosea, chasing after wicked men. That sure sounds like America today! I have heard tragic stories, one after the other all my life, from men and women alike of unfaithful spouses who betrayed, hurt and eventually abandoned them. Hebrews 13:4, “Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.” God's judgment cannot rest forever!
Young women, please don't wear thongs bikinis (or any bikinis for that matter). From the back you look naked. You are advertising something you may not want to give. Men are visual, even old men. Are you enjoying causing men to lust after you? This is exactly what you're doing.
My first inadvertent glimpse of the depraved “art” of dick-pic photographer Robert Mapplethorpe (1946 – 1989, selfie) occurred while Googling images using the search term “Sausalito,” a quaint seaside community across the bay from San Francisco.
While scrolling the first page of postcard-style scenery, I was unwittingly subjected to a stylized black-and-white photo of a hooded man urinating into another man’s mouth. The source of the scatalogical image, titled “Jim and Tom, Sausalito” (1977), is the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) website. I would’ve guessed it was some hardcore fetish porn magazine for homosexuals.
The following links provide a shortlist of Mapplethorpe’s depraved work: S&M, black mass, fisting, pissing into a glass, penises, rectums, satanism and awkwardly posed naked children. If you Google Mapplethorpe, you’ll also find, oddly enough, that he photographed flowers and celebrities. I won’t be displaying any of Mapplethorpe’s garbage on this website. Frankly, I don’t even like writing about him, but Winter Watch contributors believe it’s important to raise awareness about cultural rot and the weaponization of art.
On a connotative level, there’s a dangerous message here, especially for aspiring photographers and artists. The message is that success is not about God-given talent or the inherent artistic value of thoughtful work. Rather, to be revered and successful, one must constantly find new ways to lower the bar. One must be willing to exploit everyone and everything around them — even if it means killing your pet monkey and prostituting yourself to homosexuals.
Massage Parlors are EVIL
Only in a sinful, carnally-minded society do people go get a massage, letting someone of the opposite sex usually) put their hands all over you from head-to-toe. It is just plain wrong.
When I hear someone say that they're going to get a massage, I know that they're not right with God. Oh, I know, everyone has a bad back, or a bad leg, or some other health problem that they use to justify getting a massage; but it doesn't matter. It is sinfully for a man to have a woman putting her hands all over him (unless it's his wife). Massages are unscriptural and sinful, because they potentially arouse sexual desires (at least in a healthy, normal man) and often lead to sexual immorality during the massage. God calls all believers to a life of holiness.
A wife who doesn't mind if her husband gets a massage by another woman; probably dresses like a whore, has a loose past of fornication, approves of abortion, accepts homosexuality, et cetera. Only an immoral wife would approve of her husband getting a massage by another woman. You should be jealous over your spouse, just as God is jealous over His own (Exodus 20:1-5).
Massages are sinful. No one should touch you except your spouse. Even a man touching a man is creepy. No man should massage another man.
Re: “Let's stop using libfem language. "Sex Work" is not a thing - the correct term is Prostitution.”
Language matters. I'm appalled at how many young women on this sub are involved in Only Fans, camming and other things that they call "sex work." This is not normal or healthy. Call it what it is, PROSTITUTION. This kind of thing has become shockingly normalized. Calling things what they are and not using euphemisms is the first step in turning this around.
What is love, actually? What is love being misunderstood as?
Love is an anti-sexual feeling
First of all, I know all of this by experience. I have been in love multiple times before, and I am as certain as one could ever be, that what I felt was love. It was amazing. It was an experience of quality, and definetely something that everyone deserves to feel and understand. ...Which they clearly don't.
Though I never succeeded at getting into a relationship, I have been close, and I have felt what it would be like to have a girlfriend, without being in doubt about anything.
Okay let's begin...
Love is the most effective feeling against sexual thoughts. The idea of thinking sexual thoughts have never been more distant, and for once, revealingly demotivating, than that very moment of quality when you're in love. On top of that, being in love also makes you feel alive and very emotional, whether it's the happy kind, or the sad kind where you're missing that person.
Love is basically two things:
• Emotional and
Couples who are having sex is just as misunderstood about love as couples who claim to not feel emotional about their relationship. I'm having a hard time respecting people who can't see the logic in this, who choose to have sex with that very special "loving" partner that they claim to love. B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T...
If you haven't felt this kind of emotional and anti-sexual feeling before, then you are unexperienced with romantic love, and you shouldn't be allowed to have a girlfriend/boyfriend.
If you haven't felt this kind of emotional and anti-sexual feeling before, then you are unexperienced with romantic love, and then you probably haven't found that one and only person yet. But don't worry... once that happens, you'll know EXACTLY what I mean.
But how come our relationship seems to work out so well, when we're having sex?
Because you're confused about whether you're having a nonromantic sexual relationship, or a romantic nonsexual relationship. I'll get to that later... But keep in mind that you two WANTED eachother. You are simply partners. I prefer to call that "natural attraction". However, the day you realise what it would be like to have a LOVER then you will not want to think about having a simple partner anymore. Until then, please don't abuse the word "love" again. It's a strong word that one should simply not condescend with something as silly as sex.
Okay, so let's bring up some facts:
• You can have a romantic non-sexual relationship.
• You can have a non-romantic sexual relationship.
• You can have a non-romantic non-sexual relationship.
• You cannot have a romantic sexual relationship*
* Such a thing does not exist. Romance is non-sexual. Sex is non-romantic. These two things does not work out together at any time. When you “crush on” someone, your brain sees the non-sexual beauty on someone. Both the inner non-sexual beauty (approachability, intelligence, interest in you, personality, etc.) and the outer non-sexual beauty (look, voice, clothing, and all those things). Basically, every positive thing that you can find on someone that does not include anything sexual. Love is like a magic thing that can vanish ALL sexual feelings and temptations, and replace them with all the non-sexual qualities of that one special person that you’re having a crush on.
The more in love you are with someone, the more inappropriate it feels to think of them in a sexual way. When you’re truly in love, you might even forget that sex is a thing that exists in this world, temporarily! Love is simply the most powerful feeling in the world, and the more you feel it, the more distant the idea of sex becomes. This is why I think EVERY SINGLE PERSON in this world NEEDS to read, and think about this quote: “Love is an anti-sexual feeling” before even talking about, and using the word “love”.
Also, make sure you don't misunderstand my point! If you want to have a child, and reproduce, go ahead and do it! Just make sure my message is clear, and you're doing what you have to do for the right reason ☺
This has nothing to do with religion. I am 100% atheist, and this is nothing but pure knowledge that comes from years of experience with being in love, and being part of the loving nature in mankind.
Think of a girl or a boy that you really like. Maybe your crush, or your girlfriend/boyfriend.
Now imagine that their parents just died in a traffic collision, and now they're standing next to you crying. What would you do? Comfort them, right? This is where, my theory about love really becomes clear. The thought of doing anything sexual to them suddenly becomes very inappropriate. Inappropriate because giving comfort just really doesn't work out with sex, or have anything in common with anything sexual.
That feeling you get, when you decide to comfort someone, is exactly how love is supposed to feel. Love is like wanting to comfort someone all the time, even when they're not sad. Love is also the ability to feel "comfortful" torwards someone who isn't even sad. You can tell that two people really love eachother, when the 'comfortful chemistry' is between them as a standard, and no tragic experience is needed. These are difficult words, but actually, this is precisely what I mean. Sex is just an inappropriate thing when it comes to love. Period.
Another reason to say that love is an anti-sexual feeling
When you fantasize about someone in a sexual way, you're thinking of them as an object. A sexual object. You may not always think of them as an object, but once you're fantasizing about them in a sexual way, all you see is an object.
Now... love is the exact thing that makes us humans see the PERSON that hides behind a human's body. Love makes us feel the other person's identity, as if it was our own. Love makes us realise that behind another person's body, exists something far more amazing than just an object. If you're actually in love with someone else, then it also means that you will find it wrong to think of them as an object - at any given time.
In other words: You will not think of them in a sexual way, because the personality, and the identity that you see will keep disturbing your sexual thoughts. It is NOT possible to sexually fantasize about someone that you love unless you're really concentraded about not thinking about their personality, and identity. So yes... it IS possible to sexually fantasize about a loved one, but only if you're trying hard to not think about all the things that makes you love them. And honestly... as you get closer and closer to someone that you love, get to know them better and better, this whole idea of thinking sexual thoughts about them WILL become more and more distant. Because you will automatically find it wrong to think of them as an object for sex. THAT'S HOW LOVE WORKS! If you do not feel this way, then you do not feel love, simple as that.
" People who find the love of their lives, and then later have sex with them, is like people who buy the most expensive meal in the world, and then soaking it with Heinz Ketchup. "
Theory: Love is an anti-sexual feeling
Theory proven and confirmed
As a lesbian, I fucking HATE the gay community.
Even when I was growing up and coming out as a baby gay, ive always despised people who just HAD to make their sexuality the single facet of their personality. What happened to just loving people differently and moving on with your life? I used to be heavily involved in my schools gay community, and all we did was discuss shit in a safe place. How to come out, our worries, our anxieties, our issues.
Instead we get the mess that is pride. Instead of helping our community and continuing the tradition of activism, all we get is an excuse to party and shoving genitals BDSM and other fucked up fetishes down the throats of kids! There are still real issues facing us. Higher rates of drug addictions, homelessness and obesity. But no, all we want to do is fucking drink and go clubbing. I was talking to my coworker the other day and he said all he wanted was a Pride that he could bring his dad and kids too to show what were about. I had to point out that some people still do bring their kids! To have them see furry and leather suits that show wildly swinging peens. Disgusting.
God forbid you criticize anyone. You get labelled a self hating gay, and “unworthy” to wear the label. Well guess what? Im a lesbian loving pussy even if im not “woke”. Its like the SJWs on tumblr infiltrated the real world. Giant rainbow flags, dildo tents, and nudity, so much nudity. The straights are right, youre being fucking obnoxious. And when people are less approving of us, this is why. Its shit like this that makes people hate us. What weve become in this day and age isnt something to be celebrated.
Dont even get me started on how ive gotten banned from the largest lgbtq sub just for stating that as a lesbian, I dont like dick. A literal clown world where I have to not only state, but get banned for stating the obvious? What kind of twilight zone shit am I living in?
There was a time where being a part of the community meant something. Now its all abide by my political beliefs or get out. Where was the queer community that welcomed everyone regardless of what they believed in regardless of their belief, instead of this militant mess we have today? If you honestly believe someone deserves to be treated like shit because they have a different opinion than you, YOURE the one being intolerant, and perpetuating the very thing you claim to fight. But hurrdurr its different cause were oppressed. No, youre acting like a fucking asshole, fullstop. And playing the victim card to justify your hate is fucking revolting. This community is being divided, where the more sensible of us just want to fuck off and live our lives in peace while the vocal minority just keeps dragging our image through the gutter.