#kinkshaming

“Mainstream society is savagely judgmental of sexual pleasure, and cruel towards anything and anyone that stands out as different.” https://www.consensualdominance.com/?p=224

Show post

Admin #transphobia #kinkshaming feministwiki.org

Transgender ideology

Transgender ideology is a loose catch-all term referring to philosophies, world views, and dogmatic statements adhered to by political activists who see themselves as trying to uphold the human rights of transgender people. The political movement of furthering these ideologies is called the transgender movement. Feminists tend to use these terms critically when pointing out sexist, homophobic, or otherwise problematic aspects of the movement. Those who support the transgender movement tend to oppose the term transgender ideology, likening it to phrases such as homosexual agenda which is used to ascribe a sinister intent to gay/lesbian/bisexual rights activists.

The practice of supporting transgender ideology is called transgender activism (often shortened trans activism) and a person who follows this practice is called a transgender activist (often shortened trans activist). The word "transgender" in the phrase "transgender activist" is not to be understood as an adjective for the person in question (i.e. "an activist who happens to be transgender") but as a reference to the activism they practice (i.e. "an activist supporting transgender ideology"). Many trans activists are not transgender themselves.

The term trans rights activist (shortened TRA) is sometimes used for its similarity to men's rights activist (shortened MRA). Just like so-called MRAs claim to support men's human rights but end up blaming everything on women and opposing feminism, TRAs claim to support transgender human rights but end up blaming everything on women and opposing feminism.

Aspects

Trans women are women

One of the core dogmata of the transgender movement is the statement that trans women are women (and the less often repeated trans men are men). Under this view it's important to write trans woman as two words (adjective and noun) and not transwoman, to stress the fact that so-called trans women are literally a subtype of women, just like white women, black women, short women, tall women, and so on. The statement "trans women are women" is not meant as a vague slogan of moral support, but in a literal sense.
Since the statement contradicts the dictionary definition of the word "woman" (adult human female), it implies that a different definition would be better. When asked about this, transgender activists usually avoid providing an actual definition. Most attempts tend to revolve around a circular definition, such as "anyone who identifies as a woman, is a woman." As such, the statement "trans women are women" is probably best described as a dogma.
The idea that transwomen are literally women is taken as the basis for many problematic conclusions, such as: transwomen deserve to partake in women's sports, transwomen should be seen as part of the natural dating pool of lesbians (see also cotton ceiling), transwomen deserve to use all female facilities, enter female-only spaces and events, speak on women's rights as women, and so on.

Gender identity

The idea that "trans women are women" is usually backed by a belief in an essential, inborn, and immutable "gender identity" that every person supposedly possesses.[6] Transwomen are said to be real women on the grounds that they possess a "female gender identity" which they are said to share with women. Likewise for transmen and a "male gender identity" that is supposedly shared by all men.
Just like transgender activists refuse to provide an objective definition of womanhood, they tend to refuse defining gender identity on any objective terms. Usually, when explaining how a person has discovered their gender identity, one hears references to sexist stereotypes ascribed to womanhood and manhood. When confronted directly however, transgender activists refuse the notion that gender identity is based entirely on those stereotypes. Since no objective measure exists at all, they are effectively forced to accept the claims of anyone and everyone regarding what their gender identity is. Thus we see transwomen with full beards and intact male anatomy, who are said to be literally real women like any other.
Transgender children
Since gender identity is said to be inborn, it follows that some children would be transgender, and only need to find this out. Once it's found out, the only way forward is to support the child in its transgender identification. This leads to the transgender activist "affirm-only" approach towards youth, where for instance a boy who says "I wish I was a girl" or "I'm actually a girl" is from that point on treated as if the child is literally a girl. (Given a female name, referred to by female pronouns, asked to be considered a girl by others, and so on.) Likewise for girls who express that they wish they were a boy, or claim that they are internally a boy. Trans activists are opposed to the alternative "watchful waiting" approach.
The trans activist affirm-only approach has been supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics.[7] Parents concerned over this model of treatment published a long criticism and launched a petition reaching 1,200 signatures.[8] Psychologist James Cantor also published a fact-check article criticizing the AAP's decision.
Trans activists usually support giving puberty blocking medication such as Lupron to children who think they are transgender.[7] These children may be as young as 10 years old.

Cisgender people oppress transgender people

Another core tenet of transgender ideology is the notion that cisgender people oppress transgender people, just like how men oppress women, white Americans oppress black Americans, or how straight people oppress gay men and lesbian women.[11][12] As such, when a man identifies as a transwoman, his position relative to that of a woman turns from being her oppressor to someone who is oppressed by her. His male privilege is denied as he is now considered a woman, and the fact that he is a transgender woman means that he is oppressed by so-called cisgender women. Further, being both a woman and transgender means he is considered to suffer under two axes of oppression, akin to how black women suffer both from racism and sexism. This way, a white man suddenly becomes comparable to a black woman with regards to oppressive power dynamics in society.
As per the principle of intersectionality (appropriated from black feminism), transgender activists often say that the feminist movement should not only include transwomen's concerns, but outright center them in many discussions, as otherwise the feminist movement might fail to sufficiently address their concerns.

Collusion with "sex work" activism

For reasons not entirely clear, many if not most transgender activists also seem to support the "sex work" movement.[13] Possible explanations for this collusion might be:
* Both movements stem from queer ideology, which is based on transgression of social norms without regard to ethical concerns
* The transgender movement being dominated by autogynephilic men who are interested in upholding a society in which women exist for male sexual pleasure
* Anti-feminists supporting both the transgender movement and the "sex work" movement, simply because they see both of them as weapons against women's liberation

Show post

Commentaryandthings #transphobia #kinkshaming reddit.com

I’m a 14 year old. I want to give a commentary on fetishes and how they’ve affected my friends.

I apologize if this post isn’t 100% about AGP. But it is relevant. This has been a point of concern for me for a while and I needed to get it off my chest.

I will say I do think actual trans people exist, I have met some who are normal and nice people. I just think they get over shrouded by all the fetishists out there.

I’ve noticed a lot of my friends and even myself develop fetishes. At first I thought it was normal at age since y’know... puberty but then I saw people like you talking about how it was concerning and I took a look into it.

I used to have a lot of fetishes when I was 12-13, I’ve gotten rid of a majority of them and am trying to get rid of the rest. I’ve noticed my friends are into things and it concerns me a bit.

A have a friend who’s into dragons, which honestly pretty tame when it comes to fetish standards but he’s also being into beaten. One of my other friends is into being tied up.

What really concerns me is my MtF friend. He’s into ABDL, petplay and BDSM... and like me he’s 14...

According to some people we should still have our innocence at this age, or at least have some of it. Out of the many friends I have only 1 has really maintained their innocence. I lost my innocence at age 11. It wasn’t due to anything sexual it was because when I entered middle school, I heard and saw everyone cussing at eachother, being mean to eachother, talking about sex. 5th grade was a happy and friendly enviroment. This wasn’t. I will say 7th grade was probably the best time of my life so far, but that’s a whole other topic.

I feel like we’re growing up a bit too fast. A lot of my friend’s friends have already lost their virginity.

It just feels like something is... wrong. I’m assuming that this kind of stuff isn’t normal. But if yall older folk could confirm or deny it that’d be great. I’d also like to hear your commentary on the situation as well.

EDIT: Aight it 100% not normal as I expected. I also get this weird feeling that people on this sub hate me now but hey that could just be my anxiety talking.

Show post

Admin #transphobia #kinkshaming feministwiki.org

The word TERF (or terf) is a slur that is used predominantly by transgender activists and their allies against people who criticize the transgender movement on the basis of feminist concerns. Since the slur is used for people with feminist concerns, the main target tend to be women. As such, it's usually understood to be an anti-feminist, sexist and misogynist slur.

The word was invented as an acronym for Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist, where the "trans-exclusionary" part referred to those holding roughly the position that transwomen should not be included under a feminist definition of womanhood, and the "radical feminist" part was meant neutrally, i.e. for people who would indeed describe themselves as radical feminists in the true sense. Over time, the acronym pretty much became a four-letter word. Nowadays the capitalization is frequently omitted, and the already ambiguous original meaning ignored entirely. Still, users of the term tend to claim that it's a neutral description. The "trans-exclusionary" part may now refer to anyone who thinks transwomen should not have unfettered access to all female-only spaces (e.g. changing rooms), should not partake in women's sports where they have unfair advantages, should not be considered a natural part of the lesbian dating pool, etc. Although most members of the public would see these as rather sensible positions, considering a "transwoman" may have intact male anatomy, transgender activists nevertheless see all of these types of "exclusion" as unacceptable.

A closely associated term is SWERF, which is supposed to stand for Sex-Worker-Exclusionary Radical Feminist and is used for those who see the sex industry (prostitution, pornography, etc.) as highly exploitative and sexist. Like TERF, the term is almost always applied as a slur, and to misrepresent the political position of the person it's used against. Ironically, some of those who have to face the term most commonly are women who worked in prostitution and became anti-prostitution activists as a result of their own experiences as so-called sex workers.

Show post

Helen Andrews #kinkshaming hedgehogreview.com

[From "Kicking Against the Pricks"]

The problem of pornography has never been worse than it is right now. If that sounds like an exaggeration, consider: Online streaming porn is video, rather than text or image, which makes it categorically more seductive. It is not geographically restricted to seedy parts of town but accessible anywhere with an Internet connection, by anyone of any age. Much of it is free. Barriers to entry on the supply side are nil. The flood of content over the last decade means that producers have to compete for eyeballs, and because they can’t compete on price, the easiest way to distinguish their product is by going to further and further extremes in the content itself. Technology and social change have combined to push pornography to new frontiers: More of it is being produced, and what gets produced is more depraved.

It is baffling that this unprecedented state of affairs has not called forth a twenty-first-century Comstock, but then, the original Anthony Comstock, the antivice crusader best known for lending his name to a 1873 law banning distribution of obscene material through the mail, is held in low regard. His undeserved reputation is the result of a long line of hostile treatments by his ideological opponents, of which Lust on Trial is the most recent.

[...]

Missing from this picture of Comstock is the side of him that was genuinely heroic. He was, first of all, physically brave. He survived numerous attempts on his life, including a stab in the face from a pornographer that doctors did not expect him to survive. His mail was full of death threats and, on one occasion, a box of smallpox scabs (he and his wife were immediately vaccinated), to say nothing of the bomb sent to his office, which mercifully failed to detonate. He was the first antivice enforcer in the history of New York City to be immune to bribery, which is all the more impressive considering that he refused to accept either a government salary or the share of the fines to which he was entitled under New York obscenity law. He had only his modest salary from the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice, out of which he supported his own family as well as his widowed stepmother and the wife and children of his absconded half-brother.

Comstock was not so stupid as to be unaware that he was an object of contempt and ridicule. He was sustained in his thankless task by a conviction that he was saving lives. He was originally launched on his crusade when he saw a clerk at his dry goods store drawn by a chance encounter into an addiction to dirty pictures and thence to brothels, venereal disease, and death. Comstock knew that the young men he rescued from the same fate would not thank him for it, but he was firm enough in his mission that he did not care. In order to give the reader an idea of the New England in which Comstock was raised, Werbel notes that during the Civil War his native Fairfield County, Connecticut, “with its high percentage of Christian abolitionists, rallied to the [Union] cause in large numbers.” The sense of duty and selflessness that inspired those abolitionists was inherited by young Anthony intact.

When the end came for Comstockery, it was his social betters who delivered the death blow. Comstock’s power came from the laws that allowed him to seize and destroy pornographic material, and it disappeared when those laws were rendered toothless. It was one very simple tactic that accomplished this legal revolution, and Werbel puts her finger on it exactly: “Defense attorneys were able to insist on expertise in the judgment of obscenity.” For centuries, artistic merit had been no defense against a charge of obscenity; in some jurisdictions it was actually an aggravating factor. Then a new standard began to develop in state courts and, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 1957 decision in Roth v. United States, in the federal judiciary, requiring consideration of a work “taken as a whole” (in the words of Justice William Brennan, writing for the majority in Roth). This opened the door to expert witnesses from university art and English departments willing to expatiate upon the artistic merits of the illustrated Fanny Hill, which, if sufficiently great, would legally outweigh its pornographic demerits.

No point mincing words: This “expertise” was entirely bogus. When English professors lined up to defend Lady Chatterley’s Lover, they were trumpeting their moral sophistication, not their literary acuity.

Show post

Nokidscel, BK-ash #fundie #homophobia #kinkshaming reddit.com

ISIS is based
gays are degenerate pedos, non penile-vaginal sex is a sin and should be punished greatly
Death to sexual freedom

If you see it that way, no matter if its the muslims, the russians or the chinese who conquere us things stand to improve really

Russians allow deviancy, so do Chinese, Muslims are the only based ones except they are mongrels so they would want to mix everyone and if they do conquer us many non muslim men will be incels because because of shit islamic rule that only male muslims can intermarry with non muslims
I hate all three I want to start a new culture

BK-ash: Absolutely based, I'd unironically join ISIS if killing people wasnt haram

Show post

Some incels #sexist #conspiracy #kinkshaming reddit.com

Re: It's already beginning

image

[Transcript: The Daily Signal: The American Psychological Association says monogamy is the new bigotry.]

(OnlyTrueCels)

Mental health professions are full of subversive cucks, wanting the collapse of Western civilization.

I wonder who could be behind such a thing? Who could have such motives.....

(Charlie_truth2)

Just go see a therapist bro ! Meanwhile this is what they do

This is what female health "professionals" think of men patients

(GayAlienSkull)

seriously, therapy is such a fucking joke. i can't believe how much money I wasted on it. if therapy actually helped you, you never had an real problems to begin with.

(PhilMcCracken760)

At least the pic isn’t a cuck and his wife’s bull

Of course it isn't. They need to sell this to all kinds of men, remember? The one who thinks he could totally pull a threesome with that secretary at work if only his wife would get on board with the idea. The one who thinks that he'll be more romantically successful if his dating pool included married women. The one who has had thoughts of cheating for years. The simp who thinks that women having more sex will result in pussy trickling down to him.

We know goddamn well that the reality is closer to your vision than the one shown to us because it's a buyer's market for even the homeliest of women whereas only exemplary men are similarly desired. But the powers that be need to hide that if Billy Beta is going to get on board with the latest and greatest assault on the nuclear family.

(Concerned-father2)

The picture shows a man with two women but we all know that 99% of these relationships will be one woman and two (or more) men. Same trick propaganda they tried to pull on us in the early 2000’s, promising trickle down effect after sexual liberalisation. Not falling for that bullshit again. And she will be holding hands with chad, while the main hubby will be tagging along behind like a dog.

Show post

Some incels #sexist #kinkshaming reddit.com

Re: Reminder: There is no such thing as a feminist woman

image

(Subhumanmanletcel)

Bitches have no value besides being a fuck hole. And they get annoyed when non chads reminds them of it. Female humor is basically whores trying yo one-up other whores with their whoreness

that dude at the bottom desperately trying to salvage womens dignity.

Can't salvage something that doesnt exist. He's trying to salvave his blue pill illusion

(Plan_o-f_Will)

Shit, I can literally feel his world melting in front of him. I felt the same way when I stopped being a bluepilled retard

Thing is, that's supposed to happen when you're a kid or maybe a teen. This dude will never get over it. He's probably in his 30s. Way too invested in the lie.

(Links_Hacks)

White knight cuck's circuitry is frying lmao. 'But...women are kweenz...how could...but...misogyny...'

(bcat124)

the difference is that the 4th panel is chad, and rest are normies/incels .

Every single woman on this earth LOVES to be called nothing but a fuckhole, if you have the right face and height.

And then people ask me why I hate women JFL ur the weirdo for not hating women imo

(HomoheroBishii)

Like a KKK member who only has sex with black people. Literally nobody would question how silly that is. Yet feminists have convinced society that their contradiction is okay because "it's only in the bedroom," even though my KKK example is also only sex related. Humans don't just suddenly turn off their instincts the moment they step outside the bedroom, so feminists basically prove this comic true: https://i.imgur.com/ZuSM1xM.jpg

(lickmytushyhole)

Radfems exist and this behavior is why they shit on libfems. They hate BDSM and anything similar to it.

Radfems and libfems are both retarded

(shadowPerla)

Feminism is a giant shit test and men keep failing it. You have no idea how many feminists are into self degradation and shit. It's all a facade. Deep inside they're just horny cunts with daddy issues, waiting to get put in their place.

(Zurgoide800)

Lol, doesn't surprise me. The feminist I used to talk to, liked getting fucked raw from behind doggystyle, with the intent of getting knocked up, as a form of roleplay. Too bad she was obese, otherwise I would have tapped that. incredibly enough, she could still find guys willing to do that, despite her obesity.

I totally see why youre hateful. That doesnt mean that whatever you argue under such hatefulness is correct.

feminists have daddy issues. every man with a little brain left, knows it. Of course nobody likes to be called a whore in a normal conversation. Do you really need to poin out the obvious? come the fuck on.

(Carkudo)

"This shit" i.e. feminist women admitting that they're sexist and prefer traditional gender roles.

"I try to empathize with you guys, but then you go and post pictures where members of my ideology admit that my ideology is morally bankrupt"

Yeah, if your empathy is predicated on not calling your ideology out on its hypocrisy, you can stick your empathy up your shapely ass because nobody needs a narcissist's "empathy"

Fair point about empathy. I guess that your situation calls for empathy regardless of your personal stance on other issues.

I dont see a connection between havimg a kink and preferring traditional gender roles.. and my ideology doesnt prohibit traditional gender roles.. it just sees them as one option among many.

The fact that the picture angers you and you wish people wouldn't post it means you do see the connection. Good job on showcasing your ideology's hypocrisy once again.

Show post

Anti Zionist League #conspiracy #racist #homophobia #transphobia #kinkshaming antizionistleague.com

Sexual Bolshevism is the politicization of sexual depraved acts and behaviours that are collectively described as mental disorders under the term paraphilias. Coined in Germany by Ludwig Hoppe, a Lutheran pastor from Berlin who in 1921 authored Sexual Bolshevism and Defense Against Same.Broadly it encapsulates Jewish Marxist persons and groups that continually seek acceptance of sexual depravity and lobby for changes to the legal and medical status of perverted sexual interests and practices. This is the origin of ‘sex education’ delivered to children in the classroom proving that it is a deliberate policy to undermine Europe.

(video titled “Truth Video: Jews Created The Porn Industry)

Show post

David J. Stewart #fundie #conspiracy #sexist #homophobia #kinkshaming jesusisprecious.org

The Luciferian elite have a secret agenda to destroy America. With 139,000,000 subscribers as of 2019, you can bet that the Devil and Luciferians behind the subversion of the United States are going to take advantage of Netflix, who have openly been promoting all manner of homosexuality, incest, sexual immorality, pedophilia, fornication, bondage and sadomasochism, vulgarity, potty humor, filthy talk, uncleanliness, adultery and unholy filth. When Netflix makes a film or series, all they want you to see is the sexual immorality. To say that Netflix is over-the-top is an understatement! The scenes that are becoming prevalent on Netflix today were considered hard core porn 25 years ago! The owners of Netflix belong in prison. God is going to cast them into the Lake of Fire!!!

The ungodly devils behind Netflix fully understand that it is human nature to watch the worst of what is set before them. Only a self-deceived liar and fool would sign up for Netflix thinking that they'll only watch the good movies, because the whole purpose of Netflix is to continually push the limit, introducing raunchier, more gore and more violence, until the viewer is submersed in total Satanism! Lesbianism is epidemic on Netflix! Hell is coming up to meet them when they leave this life. Netflix is pulling on the same rope as the Devil, preparing Americans for the coming Man of Sin, the Antichrist.

The United States is going straight to Hell. Our beaches are filled with naked sluts. All across America the nightclubs, casinos and taverns are filled with ungodly sinners who do not fear God. SIN CITY Las Vegas is our nation's legacy! Our founding fathers warned us about the dangers of scum like Netflix...

“I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.” —Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President 1801-1809

“We have not government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” —U.S. President John Adams

Netflix's movies regularly takes the Lord's name in vain, portray Christians as cults and nutcases, and desecrate everything that is right and holy. Netflix glorifies all manner of sin and wickedness! Judgment Day is coming for America, read Revelation chapter 18.

Show post

Kaguyatsukihime #homophobia #kinkshaming deviantart.com

image

[


I have to agree with you on some aspects. Yaoi 'fangirls' can be a bit overbearing at times, but there was no reason for being so . . . violent about your opinions. From my point of view, it looks like you're contradicting yourself when you say that you're not a homophobe, but then you call yaoi 'revolting,' 'gross,' and 'sick.'

It also doesn't help your case that you've also told yaoi-fans to 'GO FUCKING DIE IN HOT LAVA!'
Just saying.

]


Yaoi=fictional people that gay and also sometimes those fans use real people who are straight (daniel radcliffe) and turn them gay for their fantasies.
Homosexual=Real people in life who are gay and not made up nor are forced ending up gay because of fangirls.
You see my point now?
I just hate yaoi fans...they always ruin perfectly good fandoms by turning straights into gays for their own pleasure.


My feelings were legitimately hurt by this. Is this how people who like yaoi seem to you? There are people, such as myself, who enjoy yaoi and are completely normal and reasonable. Though honestly, I don't associate with the word 'fangirl' because I find the undertones of that word offensive.
Why is it that when you pair up a non- canon yaoi couple you get more hate than if you were to make a hetero couple that canonically would never rightfully happen?


few words of advice:
Oh go cry me a fucking river why don't you.
I have the right to hate and complain as well as rant about thinks I hate as much as the next person does.

You don't get it do you? Yaoi and
Homosexuality aren't even the same thing. I don't even know where you got that idea from!?
Those rapid fangirls keep turning STRAIGHT characters into gay characters and they do not own the characters they never got permission from the creator of the characters! So yeah I'm against that.


Oh really sure I'm a yaoiphobe but I'm not against reality homosexuality its just that you people always make uncanonical pairings.


And? People make uncanon hetaro parings? What do you have against them? People also make uncanon human/animal but you're not complaning about that.

And you came from the complaints section of the forum thus your complaining c: Have a nice day.

Show post

Kaguyatsukihime #homophobia #kinkshaming deviantart.com

image

Cute but, kill yaoi fangirls? That's...sick. Like, the bad sick.

.-. Seriously, there's no reason to kill us for liking something you don't.

But its those rapid fans who try to force us to like it. And then they even cross the line by making straight characters gay for their own enjoyment. And one even called me a Homophobe for not enjoying yaoi and not getting turned on by it.

Show post

Kaguyatsukihime #homophobia #kinkshaming deviantart.com

Please do not put up any starry sky M/M pairings utterly sickening and makes me want to throw up then stab you with a knife. I am not a homophobic nor am I close minded. But making straight characters gay is crossing the line. They are meant to be straight so keep it that way and forget about your sickening fantasies.

Would you rather us right a starry sky heterosexual pairing fic? I don't mean to be cheeky...well yes, I do but still. I find it annoying when nitpick on yaoi when it's usually hetero pairings (especially when a girl inserts herself into the story so she can be with her favorite character) that does the starry sky junk.
But again, it's not even just gay pairings you should be pissed off at. ANY pairing that has an ungraceful and trite writing strategy like that is usually asking for some dislikes.

So you're saying all anime should only have male and gay couples? I don't even see what's so attractive about yaoi. The entire logic is warped on the yaoi fandom. How can you love two men when you know they will never love you back because they're gay? It makes no sense to me. It's rather sad than sexy. You can't visualize yourself or your characer with them because they love the same sex. While in normal pairings you can change the girl's image to fit yourself or your character and pair them.


Show post

Miriamthebat #kinkshaming antiyaoi.livejournal.com

I think gay people deserve all the rights straight ones have, but I wouldn't be too happy if I was gay and had the support of yuri fans. It's kind of like pedophiles supporting little children.

Lots of fans of every kind of fictional relationship don't seem to understand the difference between love and lust. I mean, you can love your S.O, you can love your brother, you can love your best buddy, and it's the same kind of love. But lust is a completely different thing. I have a gay friend who's deeply in love with a girl, and even though he's gay, they have a very sweet and loving relationship. And then I know tons of people who only date thoes who turn them on and think it counts as love.

The majority of slash writers seem to be overly horny kids who think love (or hate...) and lust go hand in hand, and ruin beautiful friendships by making them stick their tongues down eachothers throats and bang eachothers brains out. If JK Rowling decides to write about Harry and Ron crushing on eachother and eventually becoming a gay couple, that's fine and very sweet. But until then, there's absolutely no evidence of any lust, so any yaoi of them gets labeled "sick" by me.

Next page