As a research methodologist the lack of defining terms spins my head..we are asking people for their views on an undefined, fluid and subjective group that can’t even define itself!
Trans is an illusory demographic created by the forced teaming the children of homophobic parents, & those who have fallen victim to the social contagion of gender identity beliefs,
with
adult male AGP fetishists who want to put on a male dominance displays everywhere they go.
6 comments
To the research methodologist: It’s difficult to define “trans”ness because it is a phenomenon that hasn’t been studied very well so far. What we do know (and that’s were the “trans” part comes in) is that transpeople have an inborn lack of congruence between their chromosomal and hormonal biological sex at birth and the sex their brains develops towards (though it might be even more complicated than that), leading to a further lack of congruence when it comes to their sex and their gender later on. It’s difficult to fully define precisely because biology is messy, but there are clear differences to for example intersex people (who simply express phenotypical developments of both sexes) and nonbinary gendered, agendered and genderqueer people (which are different gender expressions and are not at all bound by biological sex). You can be all three of these things because they do not directly contradict each other from what I can tell. As I said, it’s messy, but that’s nature for you.
To the other person: Shove your conspiratorial and frankly both transphobic and misandrist nonsense right up your own ass, you hateful prick. You are no better than the people calling all homosexuals “groomers”. You have no evidence for your goddamn “AGP fetish” theory, but you love spouting it, just because it portrays all transpeople as sexual predators. When they are in fact the group with the highest amount of sexual abuse directed towards them. You are the problem, not transpeople, who VERY MUCH do exist.
adult male AGP fetishists
image
I'm sure they'll have progressed to PCI-e fetishism by now. [/Doug Piranha-levels of sarcasm]
Look at the CUDA cores on that by NVidia, eh...?!
“we are asking people for their views on an undefined, fluid and subjective group that can’t even define itself!”
And that’s odd, isn’t it? Transgendered people are not a new thing invented this news cycle. They go back a long time. Even if you only count sex reassignment surgeries, it’s over 100 years.
And we still don’t have a vocabulary to discuss it?
Seems unusual to me. But then, it’s not something people wanted to talk about. Except for laughs, like that M*A*S*H episode where they threatened Klinger with it…
But now it’s coming out into the open and into headlines. Too bad the Whackadoodle Right is trying to drown out any voice but their own in defining the condition, the terms, the basis and the legal consequences…
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.