In my experience, accusations of mental illness are the immediate liberal's response to someone disagreeing with them.
Just like how they view all humans to be minerals waiting to be harvested.
10 comments
Yeah. Well, after late November last year, we saw - and continue to see, just as they saw a lack of a 'Red Wave' - the kinds of reactions which contradict your 'claims'.
Indeed, it could be said that your own obsessional need to continue this line of thinking says so much about your state of mind, OP.
“In my experience, accusations of mental illness are the immediate liberal's response to someone disagreeing with them.”
Yes, yes, everyone on the RIGHT claiming that all transgenders are mentally ill actually has th eeducation and experience to diagnose the condition.
And every single bitchhag claiming to know more about virology, vaccines, and herd immunity is a licensed immunologist.
Yes, yes, we believe you.
MGT thinks Hillary Clinton eats the faces of children.
So, we got delusions, pathological lying, narcissistic personality disorder, and histrionic personality disorder.
You were saying?
That's not even going into the GQP dumbfucks who insist that Trump won an election he lost {by a lot ), and that Biden's whole term has just been Jim Carrey forgetting that he loathes Trump and is playing the part for Dotard's benefit, but any day now Trump will take back his throne and alien beds will replace actual scientifically-based medicine and Obama will be executed for daring to PWB and…y'know, the whole laundry-list of insane nonsense they believe. It's a lot, too much to go into here.
And the topper on this shit-cake? These loons could have easily gotten help for their myriad mental issues if Republican God-King Ronnie “The Bonzo-Beddy-Byer” Raygun hadn't mothballed America's mental health institutions.
In my experience, accusations of mental illness are the immediate liberal's response to someone disagreeing with them.
And if this was, say 2010, I would agree that this was overused and problematic. Today? Doesn’t happen nearly as often, and usually gets smacked down by fellow leftists. Meanwhile on the Right they’ve been all too free to dismiss inconvenient people on their side as “mentally ill lone wolves”, though that rhetoric seems to have been fading somewhat in the last couple years.
Unless you’re referring to calling people “narcissist”, “narc”, “n-type”, or even just “N”, which is mostly abuse survivor language referring toxic/abusive people in general, not necessarily ones with Narcissistic Personality Disorder. It’s not specifically a liberal thing (conservative abuse survivors use this language as well) but it shouldn’t be used in political discourse regardless.
Just like how they view all humans to be minerals waiting to be harvested.
Just spitballing here, but this reminds me of the rhetoric that left-wing politicians don’t care about minorities, they just pander to them for donations and votes. Even ignoring the fact that some such politicians themselves are minorities (it varies by country, but the Left tends to look a lot closer to a cross-section of the population than the Right does) that’s more of a lack of imagination on your part than anything resembling reality.
No, but when your claims are so outlandish that they are indistinguishable from psychotic ramblings, I'm sure that some people who detect it will point at that.
Just like how they view all humans to be minerals waiting to be harvested.
Just like this. You're poisoning your own well. Don't expect people to give you an "equal-level rational debate" propaganda show about obvious lies based on false premises that can simply be dismissed as such.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
