As we all knew, this was ALWAYS about election interference and stopping President Trump from winning his rightful re-election to the White House.
The American people see through the Democrat games and know this is a sham verdict.
We stand with PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP!
7:13 AM · May 31, 2024 · 186.8K Views
1,612 Reposts 100 Quotes 10K Likes 35 Bookmarks
14 comments
Thing is, Lauren Booboo, IF this truly WAS a sham-trial meant to keep Trump out of the White House, then Trump wouldn’t have been given ANY chance to defend himself, wouldn’t have been given such a long-winded public trial, and certainly would have already been locked up for life (however short that may be for him) for his sheer contempt of court.
But as it stands the Law sadly still allows Trump to run for President even if he is sentenced to mere months in jail, which is already highly unlikely. No, it’s more likely that he’s just going to pay a fine or something.
Seriously, if Trump didn’t want a criminal record, he simply shouldn’t have done all those illegal things.
“As we all knew, this was ALWAYS about election interference and stopping President Trump from winning his rightful re-election to the White House.”
If that was the case, he’d have been found in contempt the instant he fucked up, and spent the night in jail.
“The American people see through the Democrat games and know this is a sham verdict.”
The entire internet that _I_ saw yesterday was people cheering the verdict.
“We stand with PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP!”
Convicted rapist, convicted thief, convicted felon Ex-President Trump. You stand over there with him…
Yeah. Well, twelve good people and true saw through the games of you Trumptards, thus their decision proves your opinions wrong, Buboe. Now go and suppurate outside of Fart Tower: maybe your orange senpai might notice you.
Because when even Nurgle avoids a disease such as you …!
stopping President Trump from winning his rightful re-election to the White House.
For one thing, what the fuck is a “rightful re-election”? You know he still has to get the votes (excuse me, I should have said “has to get the electors”), regardless of whether you think the previous elections were “stolen” or not? Also, I’m old enough to remember that nutjob Lyndon LaRouche being on the ballots when I went to vote for a President, so I know being convicted of a crime doesn’t stop one from running for President.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.