More to that, this completely contradicts the fact that in the early US, each state had total control over all religious expression in its own borders. So claiming that religion in this context refers to just Christianity makes no sense. He is trying to read in a false 18th century definition of religon like Bryan Fischer while trying to make the amendment operate as it does in the 21st century. You cant have it both ways Tanner! You cant use 18th century definitions while rejecting how the amendment was acutally applied in the 18th century.