Southerners conquered Indians (not native Americans mind you) rightfully. The act of conquering another group of people, especially groups as satanic as the Indians, is not intrinsically wrong.7153
25 comments
So is that why you keep complaining about immigration? If moving in and settling an area isn't intrinsically wrong, why bitch?
But, let's see. It wasn't exclusively Southerners who believed in and participated 8n Westward expansion and slaughtering Natives. They were called Indians at the time, sure, but the term is certainly less accurate than Native Americans. Being the most charitable, they can be considered synonymous, the idiot OP is trying to make some distinction between the terms. Regardless, the various groups were not Satanic. And while it certainly has been a thing through history, one can easily argue that the invasion, subjugation, and slaughter of a native population IS intrinsically wrong.
So everything this idiot said is incorrect.
“Southerners conquered Indians”
"(not native Americans mind you)”
"rightfully.”
“The act of conquering another group of people, especially groups as satanic as the Indians, is not intrinsically wrong.”
No it was the Portuguese and later the English who colonised India, while it was the Spanish, French and English who colonised the Americas. If you won't use the correct terminology for them, why should we take anything else you say seriously?
Incidentally, there might be a race of 👽 orbiting us now, who think it's not intrinsically wrong to conquer a group like us.
@Titania #177551
Well technically India had a few French and Dutch colonial outposts as well, but you are correct. We shouldn't take these neo-confederate morons seriously if they cant even use basic terminology. Notice how he isn't insisting calling Indonesians “Indians” even though that was the terminology commonly used for centuries in European languages. What an excellent show of ignorance.
…and just as Native Americans conquer you via they squeezing white people like you dry in the casinos they own today: including one previously run (into the ground) by Donald Fart: and a mere South African lawyer wrested away an entire subcontinent from the British Empire, fell asleep during History and Geography classes much OP…?!
Southern Golan: “The act of conquering another group of people, especially groups as satanic as the Indians, is not intrinsically wrong. And by ‘satanic’ I mean exactly what the term MEANS: Not A True Christian!!”
<@KeithInc. > #177541 When i think of the INdian Wars, it’s not the South i typically think of
The South was a huge partisan of expanding on Indian lands to have more space for slave plantations, such as for the Trail of Tears.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
