“1.?The Bible states ten times that life reproduces only after its own kind.”
This is consistent with evolutionary theory. The difference between two generations will be so incredibly small you won’t detect any change. A dog ‘kind’ will have dog ‘kind’ offspring.
“Yet evolution preaches that all life is a blurred continuum.”
More like one of those stop-motion films of a seed becomeing a tree. Look at an acorn and an oak. They hardly resemble one another.
"2. … Would this same God use a method of dead ends, extinctions, and survival of the fittest to make us? I think not.”
Any time that _I_ say God’sa ctions don’t make sense, I’m told either that ’God’s ways are mysterious’ or ‘who the fuck are you to judge God’s choices?’
Your objection does not make evolutionary theory incompatible with belief in Jehovah.
"3.?Belief in evolution justified the excesses of the industrial revolution, the Nazi elimination of the Jews”
Actually, the Nazis killed the Jews because they killed Christ.
Hitler had Darwin’s books burned.
"It also serves as the primary justification for disbelief in God.”
Meh. Science is neutral on the supernatural. Might as well say that knowing about electricity disproves the various lightning gods.
" these historical atrocities are the undeniable result of taking evolution to its logical conclusion.”
I deny that because you’re just making shit up. The logical conclusion of evolution is that we’re social animals and have more in common with the other nations than we have differences.
You’re confusing evolution with atheism, and atheism with nihilism.
“Abundant scientific evidence exists that microbe to man evolution has never taken place.”
No, sweetie. A BUNCH of evidence has been used to justify really poor math that TRIES to say it disproes evolution. But the odds of an event that already happened are 1:1. So, not a useful objection, either.
“The fossil record shows no credible links between major groups of plants and animals”
Excpet that there was a time with NO mammals, then there were mammal-lke creatures, then there were mammals. It’s a logical conclusion from the evidence collected.
"The chemical structure of DNA contains useful information which could not have developed by natural processes.”
Exactly what sort of experiment would establish that it could NEVER develop?
Or do you just use ‘chances are so small’ as your evidence?
“Also, there is abundant evidence for a worldwide flood which undermines the possibility that evolution could have happened.”
No. THere’s none. Especiall y in the written records of societies that existed at the alleged time of the Flood.