“The Big Bang is not provable or recreatable in science.”
Nothing in science is proven, and recreating is not necessary in science.
The criteria for science is ‘repeatable observations.’ not ‘eyewitnesses.’
“Evolution is a faith based science which only has theories to back it up.”
Well, theories to explain the facts that it’s based upon.
“Creation is a faith based science that has God and His word to back it up.”
No. Creation is religion, not science. Science can’t have magic.
“Archeology is constantly finding evidence to back the Bible as well as evidence that counters evolution.”
The fact that cities mentioned in the bible really existed do not back up the woo parts of the bible.
And Archeology is not studying biology.
“Logic and science are imperfect but Gods word is perfect.”
God’s word that describes the earth as flat and the sun rolling around inside the solid sky?
“Please name something about evolution that is provable.”
Evolution is the change of frequency of alleles in DNA over time. Compare the DNA of one species at two different times in its existence, any difference is evolution.
“I understand that miricles are hard to prove with science”
Science is naturalistic, it cannot research something that requires supernatural activity.
"but they do happen and many have witnessed them.”
Oh, you have testimony, why didn’t you say that? But the plural of anecdote is neither ‘evidence’ not ‘proof’
“But no one has witnessed evolution.”
It’s been observed.
“To evolve is to get stronger or better,”
Nope. Try again.
“but archeology has found tools, pottery, and structures that are far more superior to our own and they date back to the beginning of the Biblical time.”
More superior? Really?
Citation needed and grammar check needed.
“Why hasnt man found ways to improve on these things,”
what things?
“ because truth be told we are actually de evolving rather than evolving.”
Truth be told there’s no such thing as de evolving.
“Your hard math cannot explain God because He is above any math amyone can come up with.”
Zero evidence plus zero testable observations equals zero gods. Nope, seems to work fine.