“This [that Darwin's personal 19th century views don't affect the validity of evolution] is the height of mediocrity”
The height of mediocrity… That’s an image.
"it is a poor attempt to dilute racial stigma.”
Except in Darwin’s use, race should read as ‘breed,’ more than anything else. The better adapted breed will dominate the species.
"If I had a personal vendetta against a given subject, there would be more than a likely probability that I would assimilate and throw this negativity into the groundwork”
How much access to the ‘ground work’ would you have on a subject that’s lasted long enough to jusify your vendetta?
And what evidence would you provide to get everyone else to accept it?
" even refraining from being proactive in this instance, would change the foundation of my subject to some extent.”
Yeah, yeah, sure, just join science and publish bullshit.
" Considering this is a man who fathered evolution, and also the fact that his work was an evidence of at least some racial prejudice,”
It doesn’t. You’re believing the lies of creationists.
“it is a disgusting reveal into the much hyped-up bullshit perpetuated by many evolutionists, under the sickening guise of reason.”
Everything Darwin argued has been evaluated. It’s eitehr held up under scrutiny, or it’s been discarded.
If the work is racist, then everyone that ever looked at it has to have been deeply racist or they’d have caught it by now.
You idiots keep thinking the original work has been treated like divine revelation. You don’t understand science, or evolution, or modern vocabulary