“Tell me, you all knowing atheist non creationists,”
all-knowing, atheist, non-creationist.
“how did the primordial soup decide what an eye would look like or how it should function or an ear or a nose?”
Form follows function. An eye looks like an eye because of how the eye operates.
“How did the primordial soup determine that there should be millions of different species of fish, fowl and mammal etc?”
Natural selection.
“and what they should look like, act, behave, build nests etc. etc. etc.?”
Form. Function. Again.
“How did just two microscopic thingamajigs get together and say, Hey, we need to make an elephant!”
They didn’t.
“Yes, and this is how it should look.”
What IS your fascination with looks?
“Let's give it huge ears, eyes, a trunk for a nose, tusks etc.?”
Selection. Stuff that worked was retained, the rest was not.
“Then two other microscopic thingamajigs also got together and decided that there needs to be monkeys.”
This isn’t even a cartoon oversimplification, just flat out bullshit.
“Then to more and this went of until there were millions of pairings of two thingamajigs that each decided to make an entirely separate animal.”
You’re drawing the tree of life as more of a hydra.
“What you in fact are doing is deifying the primordial soup.”
No, that’s what you’re doing. Most of what you’re talking about was well away from the beginning blocks.
“Maybe you atheists should worship pond skum?”
You can’t even spell scum?
Wow.
You’re stupid.