“Why is evolution cemented in the minds of many as fact, when it is nothing more than theory?”
Because evolution has been observed. It is a fact.
There is ALSO a theory that tries to explain all the facts of evolutionary biology.
It’s not complicated.
“How did this occur?”
People knowing what they’re talking about?
“Certain aspects of evolution may be confusing and difficult to understand.”
Do you have an example that’s worth actual print?
“The rationale invented to support evolution is bewildering and complicated.”
We are imperfect replicators and change creeps in to every species. The more successful changes are retained and passed to the next generation.
“It is tiresome and boring.”
Yes, surely, of course.
“Certain facts are conveniently left behind, and tedious scholarly language is used to stop most people from examining the subject in detail.”
You can prove this intent? Or is this just poisoning the well of actual science?
“Left frustrated, most assume evolution to be fact.”
Why would frustrated people assume that? I mean, you don’t vote for the politician that won’t explain his voting record. You don’t buy the car that the salesman won’t explain the features. You don’t hope that the confusing, unresolved movie gets the Oscar.
“This series will demystify the subject.”
Betcha it won’t.
“ You will know if evolution is science fact or science fiction.”
So, you intend to lie.
“ Convoluted and illogical theories will be simplified in a way never before presented.”
And you’ll pretend this is a better view of the science. Yes,lies.
“ While some sections are technical, the more detail given, the better you will be able to see through the theory’s “smoke and mirrors.””
There are no smoke and mirrors in science, it would be very difficult to get a trick through peer review.
“ Clear and simple logic always destroys ill-conceived suppositions.”
Yes. But logic doesn’tactually change physical evidence.
“Once evolution is dismantled,”
Oh, you have an axe to grind, and a premise.
“ you will be left with many questions—and serious implications.”
Uh huh.
Got any science to go with these accusations?