Top posts since
last month

www.blog.reaction.la

Jim #sexist blog.reaction.la

[From “No deal available for men and women to have a life together”]

Marriage 1.0 is now illegal, and there is no alternative with which to form a family that is legal and socially acceptable in polite company

Love is war, love is a battlefield, all is fair in love and war

Marriage 2.0 does not work. A ship must have one captain, and a household one captain, and if you have two captains you have two ships, which wind up passing in the night

Young men view young women as icky and broken, and young women view young men as — well they just don’t see them at all, because almost all young males are lower status than almost any young woman[…]Miss average wants to fuck mister one in thirty, this is the new and worse problem that when miss average is pushing thirty years old and thirty pounds overweight[…]
For men, it is much simpler. Most men don’t get pussy, and if they do the juice is not worth the squeeze. Does he want miss average thirty year old and thirty pounds overweight?

But wait. Some men, some social groups, and some nations are still successfully reproducing. Not many, but definitely some[…]
If you look at population groups that do it, the key factor is that the girls during puberty are attending a school that teaches old type religion, in which God commands marriage 1.0[…]
If you look at nations that do it, the state religion is not progressivism, nor a nominally deistic religion converged to “the arc of history”, it is an old type deistic religion[…]
If you look at individual males that do it, the key factor is that under their roofs they are King and High Priest[…]
If you look at female erotic fantasies, they are mostly rape fantasies, or rape fantasies rather thinly disguised as not-quite-rape fantasies[…]
Marriage 1.0, decribed above in quotes from the bible, is everywhere illegal and subject to strong disapproval[…]
Reproduction requires cooperation. Cooperation requires enforcement, and the only deal that works is illegal

Jim #sexist #fundie #crackpot #dunning-kruger blog.reaction.la

[From “Feminists Cosplaying Character from Porn”]

Feminism is a shit test, and they are, in desperation, giving us the cheat code to pass it

The “Handmaid’s tale” is a porn novel for women

It is often described as fetish novel, biblical Christian sexuality being defined as a fetish

The novel is set in Christian theocracy, where the theocrats enforce biblical policies on sex to raise fertility for everyone, and especially elite fertility. Albeit one of the measures they take to encourage specifically elite fertility (meaning elite males get more pussy, and chicks get more access to elite males) is to cater to the cuckquean sexual fetish under certain very restricted and limited circumstances, which the bible tolerates but discourages. (So this is not unrealistic for a Biblical theocracy, at least to some degree.) The novel is a cuckquean sex fantasy, and these feminists have dressed themselves as cuckqueans

The cuckquean sexual fantasy is a threesome with the protagonist as low status concubine, the higher status wife, and the way, way, way, higher status husband. And these feminists are cosplaying the low low status concubine that got a whole lot of sexy sexy dicking from the high high status male

Cuckoldry is a disgusting perversion, being contrary to survival and reproduction. Cuckqueaning is not, it is entirely normal. It is just preselection up close and personal, and you see all women acting on preselection all the time. (Cinderella) So “the Handmaid” sexual fantasy is just Biblical sex roles plus pre-selection

Jim #sexist #transphobia blog.reaction.la

[From “The girls are not OK”]

As our state religion goes lefter and lefter, indoctrination in the schools has become ever more extreme, intense and deranged

The boys are rebelling against maniacal hatred, demonization, and systematic heavy handed discrimination against males, but the girls are sucking it up

And in consequence, going every more evil and insane, ever more sad, crazy, and depressed. And every less likely to have sex, let alone love and romance, and most of all, ever less likely to ever have children

The red pill is an effort to teach men to understand women. But today’s women understand themselves even less

At puberty, girls experience a sudden and extraordinary shock. They become sexually desirable and desired. This is genuinely terrifying, and they have no idea how to handle it[…]and tend to respond in ways that become every crazier and self destructive[…]
Of course women want to be desired, and they especially want to be desired by scary dangerous men. They want to be scared. But they don’t understand that they want this[…]They are very vigorously taught that it is bad, wicked and oppressive, that men are scaring them[…]
Used to be there were social rules[…]and women were firmly steered towards paths for dealing with it[…]
Girls should not be in coed education when they suddenly and shockingly start to get hot. They are not mentally equipped to handle it — not at any age, but even less at that age

Just as the cafeteria diet, the 24/7 availability of tasty snacks, makes them morbidly obese, the ready availability of the dreaded and desired male gaze makes them whores, resulting in hoeflation

Within the official Sex-Positivity doctrine, the constraints that steered girls towards appropriate relationships with men are seen as old-fashioned and oppressive[…]
Men suffer hoeflation, women find that performing sexiness merely degrades them. Gender dysphoria is one of many self destructive female responses to the male gaze

Jim #wingnut #conspiracy #crackpot blog.reaction.la

[From “There is always a state religion”]

There is always a state religion, always has been, always will be. Universities are seminaries of the state religion to train priests of the state religion, always have been, always will be

No man rules alone. You need a tribe, or a synthetic tribe. For a large state a natural tribe is inherently too small. A faith is a synthetic tribe. An army needs a faith, and a state needs a faith

Hence your mandatory participation in DEI religious gatherings and coerced prayers

We don’t need everyone trained in priesting, need an enforceable apprenticeship system. Most people, and especially most scientists and engineers, should not attend university in their youth. The University, by its nature, is a bad place for science and technology[…]
Next stop, tanks in Harvard

Before the War of Northern Aggression, each state of the union had its own official state religion, and the official headquarters and primary seminary of the official state religion of New England was Harvard

After the war of Northern Aggression, the United States had one officially unofficial state religion, and its officially unofficial headquarters and primary seminary was Harvard[…]
When we are in charge, the officially official religion of the United States will be something that we will call Episcopalian, and will have a live connection of faith and ever faithful laity with the Anglicanism of 1660 and the Episcopalianism of 1770, but little continuity of organisation and hierarchical personnel, and such continuity as it will have will be through GAFCON

If your state religion is incoherent, as with Communism with Chinese characteristics, or widely disbelieved by its priests, as with Sadducee Judaism in Israel[…]or Anglicanism from 1820 or so to the present, your state lacks what Putin calls spiritual security[…]
Putin built the great Cathedral to protect Russia against such enemy hostile entryists. White men are building Cathedrals again

Jim #wingnut #racist #transphobia blog.reaction.la

[From “The broad left strategy”]

Leftism has no essence, except an endless campaign against the next applecart. When it runs up against an obstacle, it is apt to instantly discard its latest high ideals, write them out of history or deem them extreme radical right, and adopt some new high ideals

Socialism stopped 1949. Replaced by ever more extreme regulation and direct redistribution, which redistribution had the effect of redistributing wealth directly to the state, and redistributing ownership of capital to vast Dilbertesque quasi state corporations

Reagan and Thatcher stopped this, re-enabling capitalism while allowing the left continue full speed ahead on the destruction of the family and mass importation of the third world[…]
The left is still tightly focused on the destruction of the family and mass importation of the third world to white countries, but a significant faction of the left wants to return to an “anti oligarch” strategy, of redistributing ownership and control of capital to vast Dilbertesque quasi state corporations, as for example the California law aimed at destroying the power of entrepreneurs[…]by a confiscatory wealth tax[…]in favor of passive owners like Blackwater, and the British law against private ownership of rental properties[…]
If the left is defeated on mass migration and transitioning your children, their regroup strategy is to be “anti oligarch” — which will be primarily directed at such mighty oligarchs as independent truckers, who have just been banned in California

The left will die if prevented from getting ever lefter, but we see in process an effort to switch from mass migration and family destruction, back to the destruction of capitalism[…]“You will own nothing and be happy”[…]
The left is always led by the leftmost, and right now the leftmost are still trannies and welfare fraudsters, but the anti oligarch faction wants to be redefine leftism[…]They want you to own nothing and eat bugs