I don’t need “reliable sources” for my opinion that my accumulated life experience, knowledge, and intelligence make me qualified to be a PhD without having to spend $100,000 to have a college award me that title. This is not the same as saying I should be awarded the title of Chess Master just because of have the aptitude to be one. I never applied myself to mastering chess. Becoming masterful at knowledge, however, is not the same. I didn’t learn what I know in four years to get a PhD, but I did learn it in forty years of living and studying. On the simple basis that 80% of professors at colleges and universities say that communism is good proves that I know more and am smarter than the lot of them! I can prove them all to be wrong because I know history and understand better than any of them! Most of them made their moral judgements based on their fallacious interpretations of tribalism and multiculturalism without understanding the fundamental differences in them due to their similarities to the American “melting pot.”