It is impossible for a biological female to "get hard". It's called testosterone.And females ain't got it! They have estrogen, females are soft, for child bearing. Look at her skinny arms, weighs what, 95 pounds? lmao! Only men can "get hard".
OK admittedly this is a really old quote I found while looking through reviews for that old stupid film adaptation of Monster Hunter from 2 years ago because I was bored.
I hate how a lot of reviews start hammering on about “wokeness” and shit when trying to bash a movie, especially when this is a movie where there ARE legitimate flaws you can mention, like how the in-game lore feels pushed over for the typical US Army protags.
Women have testosterone too. It's not as much as in men but there are some.
And women can build up muscles, just like men, if that's what you're talking about.
females are soft, for child bearing.
Are you imagining that undeveloped muscles make the human body more stretchy? While I can’t speak to pregnancy and giving birth because I’ve never done either (and am probably approaching menopause anyway), as someone who works out and keeps up some muscle mass because I like the amazon look, that seems highly dubious. If anything, a properly toned body would likely help, as it would make it easier to carry an infant around both before and after birth, be more resilient against birth-caused physical damage (not so much with the chance of vaginal tearing, but with everything else), and make it easier to recover from the stresses of pregnancy, birth, and breastfeeding by having protein stores. That being said, one does still need fat stores as well, so a stereotypical “bodybuilder” lean muscle physique wouldn’t necessarily be a good idea if you want to get pregnant. (Though that does lower your fertility, which is also helpful if you don’t want kids.)
I mean, if someone wants to go for the “soft look” (whatever that means to them) or are practically restricted to it due to their biology, no shame in that. There might even be some advantage(s) to being non-athletic which aren’t obvious to me (and given that nearly everything in life is a tradeoff, I would hardly be surprised) but even if there isn’t, modern medical care mostly offsets that. I will also point out that until fairly recent times, poor women were at least somewhat in shape due to needing to engage in a lot of physical labor (if still often disadvantaged due to lack of adequate nutrition and medical care), so the “soft” middle class woman is kind of historically anomalous.
I mean… if you ask me my perfect woman has a nice balance between softness and hardness. Softness in the breasts and buttocks region, while still having decently toned abs and thighs is not something I’d really say no to…
That being said, it does depend on the person in question. Some manage to pull off plump sofftness better, some manage to pull off tight hardness better.
As far as tradeoffs, I've heard that overweight people, while more likely to have heart attacks, are also more likely to survive them. Apparently we have more stamina, too, but if so, I guess I missed the day they handed that perk out. Also, we are more likely to survive being stabbed.
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to
Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.