[Discussion] Isn't shaming men for not being able to get laid homophobic in nature?

Any guy can download Grindr and fuck a guy, this is undeniably true. Yet, people will laugh at a guy for saying "haha, you can't get laid". But the thing is, he can get laid, just with another man. The counterargument is that this "doesn't count". Well why not? Are you saying gay sex isn't sex, and not real? Is that not homophobic towards gay men? You're saying "you could participate in gay acts, but those aren't as valuable as heterosexual acts", which is basically saying heterosexuals>homosexuals, which is clearly homophobic according to SJWs.

If it gets disproven. Gay men don't just fuck anything. Or at the very least, they're no less picky than straight men.

except that's not true, any dude can fuck a dude on grindr. this is because all gay men are males, unlike heterosexuals which feature two contradicting genders

I'm talking about the male side of the equation. If a straight man had his choice, he wouldn't necessarily fuck anything and everything that came along as long as it was female. And so it goes for gay men.

so you're saying ugly gay men are unable to fuck other ugly gay men?

I'm saying if a gay man considers another gay man too ugly to fuck, he will not fuck him. Same as how if a straight man considers a straight woman too ugly to fuck, he will not fuck her.

not all straight men are like that though, many straight men have absolutely, LITERALLY, no standards. This is why femcels cannot exist