zakaria_shalih aka Masonicon #crackpot

zakaria_shalih aka Masonicon #crackpot instagram.com

[Meme of the “Change My Mind” guy]
"Petrols are must formed
from dinosaur remains”
thing are little rmre tham mere
excuses to make Precursors'
civilizations impossible fantasies
CHANGE MY MIND

Another shitpost about #silurianhypothesis

The myth is: petroleum(which's can be lifeblood for modern civilizations) must be formed from dinosaur remains so this make tens to hundreds million-years old ancient civilizations impossible IRL

The fact is: Even during age of Dinosaurs, there enough fossil fuel deposits(albeit predominantly petroleum) for Precursors themselves to start their industrial revolution during mesozoic era. They just punished from burning petrols by Jurassic-Cretaceous extinction event(which prompts their use of #ormus based technologies)

6 comments

1. Have you actually looked into the reasons that led to our conclusions on how petrol formed? Considering you think it comes from dinosaurs, rathter than decomposting marine plankton, suggests “no”.

2. Our theories of petrol formations are used very successfully in prospecting.

3. The notion of pre-Human civilisations is far too obscure to necessitate a conspiracy to discredit it, and that would have been even more when the hypothesis was first formulated in 1757.

By the way, a challenge to “change you mind” is contingent on changing your mind actually being possible. For Steven Crowder, changing his mind would threaten his brand and status in the wingnut world, so even if someone actually *does* manage to change his mind, he has a strong incentive not to admit it. Meanwhile, in the case of Masonicon… I am not sure he actually has a mind.

Yeah, two problems.

1. Not just dinosaurs would be part of the biomass used to create petrol. Just because in popular culture no one suggests that pertol "are must" come from dinosaurs. It's just that's simple to grasp and an evocative image. No one would use that as proof against a thought experiment.

2. The hypothesis is just a thought experiment. It is about thinking of the actual ways to detect an ancient civilization that was here millions of years ago, not actually suggesting any such civilization existed you twit. Obviously (or rather, hopefully) English isn't this person's first language so I'm not gonna tease any more about that, but making up and believing in some sort if precursor group isn't part of the hypothesis.

Science proves your ‘mind' wrong. But frankly, you should change it for one that works.

And not that of a Contrarian: as that by definition fails right from the start.

Hey, this is actually more coherent than the usual Masonicon babbling :D

This reminds me of a type of travel agency ad offering tours to various locations to "investigate highly advanced civilizations with superior intelligence and capabilities who once inhabited our planet tens of thousands of years ago".

To state the obvious: the proposed structures and buildings available for tours were all built by ancient but normal humans less than 5k years ago, some of the buildings are even much more recent, like just before the middle ages.

Humans like us were there 300k years ago at least, but the beginnings of agriculture only appear to have happened around ~10k years back. Anthropogenic climate change may have begun with ancient humans, but has only dramatically increased since the actual industrial revolution, something very recent. There is no evidence of any "industrial revolution" at the time of the dinosaurs and there were no humans or technological beings yet back then...

First, oil (like all fossil fuel) comes from vegetals.

And second, had a pre-human civilization previously existed then traces such as already existing chinks of steel and other alliages not found in nature should have been found. Also, some resources should have been less abundant.

zakaria_shalih aka Masonicon #crackpot instagram.com

6 comments

Confused?