The rest of the world doesn’t understand why we have the Second Amendment.
They don’t get that because of it we don’t have to ask for their approval.
20 comments
Because the rest of the world isn’t a bunch of fucking insane gun humpers! Luckily, the gun fondlers are the minority-they just never shut the fuck up about how much their guns turn them on.
I can’t wait to read about these gun lickers accidentally blowing their own heads off while polishing their rifles. Hopefully some of them are getting depressed about the NRA filing for bankruptcy.
Brandishing a gun in your fearful, trembling hands, you dare tell me not to pass a moral judgement on you and your behaviour on account of your government allowing you to have it?
Good for you, my morals and what I think and say of people isn’t really deterred by a shitty rifle though.
“we don’t have to ask for their approval.”
Except you do, whenever one of you chucklefucks goes up north to hunt or to even as much, as take a trip to Alaska, you very much do. You either come without guns, have them safely and securely checked at the border(and will only be allowed in with the stuff we consider legal for you to use, not the US constitution) or you will be checked and taken into custody upon discovering unlicensed firearms on you. You very much have to ask for our approval everywhere outside of your shitholes, so, yeah.
Oooohhh, this bitch makes me feel saltier than usual...
Ahem.... anyways....
Please do Colorado and the rest of the world a huuuuuuuge favor and pull the trigger the next time you fellate your Glock.
@The_Crimson_Ghost #74075
I can’t wait to read about these gun lickers accidentally blowing their own heads off while polishing their rifles. Hopefully some of them are getting depressed about the NRA filing for bankruptcy.
Remember, there was the trend last year of some gun owners taking pictures of themselves pointing guns at their own crotches, apparently to annoy people who talk about “trigger discipline.” If I remember right, there was at least one incident where it resulted in someone shooting themself. (Surprise surprise!)
Many countries have gun rights like ours. The second amendment isnt that unique, traitor.
And yes she is a traitor. We know she gave a tour to people days before the riots and was sending messages on social media durring the riots. She is a trator.
You have the pretension of civilization but the modus operandi of a common thug, a thug who wouldn't live very long on the street since an act of retaliation would genuinely catch you by surprise convinced as you are the response to intimidation would be to simply standthere blank eyed and drooling until you're done flexing.
...and whenever anyone you know has ever come to Britain: certainly since 1996, have you ever wondered why we have metal detectors and all our British Transport Police are armed with H&K MP7s at all our airports?
It's called 'Dunblane denies you of your right to a 2nd Amendment here' because you don't have our approval. You should understand that after 9/11.
So you want terrorists to have access to guns should they enter your country? No background checks? No wonder the NRA are bankrupt: and in more ways than one.
Maybe, but I strongly doubt you have the approval of the parents of those young children murdered at their school in Sandy Hook. Our gun laws do have the approval of Walter Mikac, who also lost his children at Port Arthur.
The rest of the world doesn’t understand why we have the Second Amendment.
You’re right, I don’t. I just don’t get why random, mentally-unstable civilians are allowed to carry (in public) arsenals bigger and more dangerous than what even the police has.
Just to be clear, I have nothing against a right to own a (unloaded & safely locked away) pistol for home defense or anything. I do have something against mentally-unstable & bloodthirsty morons carrying loaded assault rifles on the streets without consequences.
Dear, Ms. Macho-Moron-Face.
The Second Amendment just means that civilians can own firearms for hunting and self-defense, not that all civilians have a right to a firearm without background checks or that all forms of “things that go boom” are meant for civilian use.
We are not out to ban firearms. We only want regulations, background checks and gun use for civilians limited to a simple handgun or hunting rifle. No civilian has any business brandishing an assault weapon any more than they have a right to missiles or aircraft carriers! Junk like assault weapons are meant for soldiers and require special training!
Also; “WELL REGULATED Militia”. It must have govt. input and approval!
You want assault weapons because you want to overthrow the govt. …that same govt. You… a minority of Americans against The US MILITARY!… “Civil War II” would be shorter than the Anglo-Zanzibar War of 1896.
U.S. MILITARY: 2
Yes; I’m aware that some Military is Pro-moron but most are decent folks. Many are just young people looking for better career skills and structure.
@SpukiKitty
WELL REGULATED Militia
Buboe here seems to have forgotten the simple fact that at the time the Founding Fathers drew up that document which includes that 2nd Amendment, their fledgling Republic didn't have M1 Abrams tanks, M-777 Howitzers, Nimitz-class carriers, F-35/B-2/AH-64/V-22 Osprey/Predator Drone aircraft, brute-force cyberwarfare software, M16s...!
...least of all Glock or Sig-Sauer automatics that certain National Guard troops are carrying around the Capitol Building right now. Or even a US Army/Navy/Air Force/Marines as we know it today nearly 2½ centuries ago
The licence-built Westland AH-64 Apaches our British Army have. The Lockheed F-35s for our RAF/Royal Navy: the latter for our new Queen Elizabeth-class carriers.
Gee: We over the pond seem to be curiously drive-by shooting/school shooting/armed militia terrorism threat-free since 1996, OP. [/Doug Piranha-levels of sarcasm]
@SpukiKitty #74180
You want assault weapons because you want to overthrow the govt. …that same govt. You… a minority of Americans against The US MILITARY!… “Civil War II” would be shorter than the Anglo-Zanzibar War of 1896.
I like your optimism, but I think you are underestimating just how bad a "Civil War II" could be, if enough people, even if still a minority, chose to side with the rebels. Our US military is powerful, but has had significant difficulty fighting asymmetrical wars in the past.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
