@Conscience #246602
funny you're mentioning "no non-christian themes" when mariatenebre is hindu (she claims to be anti-abrahamic),though the shit she spews is no different from what a christian/muslim/jewish fundamentalist would say, just replace 'jesus/allah/yahweh' with 'durga'.(or ishtar or oshun or whatever goddess she worships at the moment since she tends to change it a lot)
despite claiming to be hindu (she's of the shaktism branch) she doesn't seem to know jackshit of the mahabharata or the goddess she claims to worship, below I'll explain why this comment's full of shit.
1-shaktism (the worship of shakti, the Divine Feminine as the supreme power) is a legitimate and ancient sect within Hinduism, emphasizing goddesses like Durga, Kali, Parvati, and Lakshmi as embodiments of ultimate reality. It's often seen as empowering for women, celebrating feminine strength, creativity, and energy. However, calling it the "True Feminine Essentialist faith" while urging rejection of feminism sounds like her personal spin—perhaps an attempt to frame it as a "superior" alternative to modern feminism. Shaktism doesn't inherently reject feminism; many modern Shakta practitioners see it as compatible with gender equality. this part is more her ideology than standard doctrine.
2-In traditional Hinduism, major goddesses like Parvati (Shakti's form) are typically monogamous, eternally wedded to Shiva. Shakti as a cosmic principle isn't depicted with multiple husbands in core texts. The closest real parallel is Draupadi from the Mahabharata, who famously married the five Pandava brothers (polyandry, which is extremely rare in Hindu mythology and explained as a divine arrangement due to a curse/boon from previous lives). Draupadi is sometimes described as an incarnation or partial manifestation of a goddess (most commonly Shri/Lakshmi, or aspects of other devis like Shachi, Bharati, etc., in various Puranas and regional traditions). In some South Indian folk beliefs and temples (e.g., during festivals like Karaga), she's worshipped with associations to Adishakti, Parvati, or even Kali, but she's not straightforwardly "the Goddess" (like Durga or the supreme Shakti) having multiple husbands. The Goddess in Shaktism doesn't "incarnate as Draupadi" in the sense of having many husbands as her standard form. This claim twists Draupadi's unique story into a general rule for the supreme Goddess.
3-This is the only semi-accurate part—Draupadi did marry the five Pandavas, and her divine origin is tied to goddess figures in some interpretations. But again, she's not the primary incarnation of the supreme Shakti/Durga in canonical sources; her links are more to Shri/Lakshmi or composite devis.
4-now this is pure invention with no basis in Hindu scriptures. Duryodhana (the eldest Kaurava and main antagonist) is described in the Mahabharata as a partial incarnation of Kali (the demon/personification of strife and the Kali Yuga, not the goddess Kali). He's never linked to Yahweh, Jesus, or any Abrahamic figure in any traditional text, commentary, or sect. There's no story where Draupadi (or any goddess incarnation) directly humiliates or kills Duryodhana in a way that "humiliates Yahweh." Duryodhana dies in combat against Bhima during the Kurukshetra war.
