"Evolution" is not a dating method, it's a theory, a model made of many working hypotheses, to explain the evidence and make predictions. Dating methods do not make claims, they estimate. Fossil dating is made using various techniques, involving chemistry, physics, geology. Fossils are only one of the many trails of evidence for evolution. Evolution is also not abiogenesis, it's after, when the organisms reproduce with descent with modification and groups evolve with natural selection.
As for C14, it's only one radiometric dating method and it has limits so is usually used for younger samples, like within ~75k years (while radioactive decay is very stable, the amount of C14 in the atmosphere at a particular epoch is known by ice core samples and these have a depth/age limit). So other methods are also used.
You're either the victim of deceivers and/or participating in a deception campaign, proposing to get rid of hundreds of years of knowledge development in favor of a modern orgin myth (misinterpreting and putting ancient human scripture out of context) for elitism and exploitation. The rejection of science is not even mainstream Christianity.
The propagandists post in such blogs and spam social media instead of publishing in reputable relevant peer reviewed scientific journals, because they risk not passing through editing and getting flamed by other scientists confirming that their hypotheses are untestable thus not science and non-existent "results", not replicable.
I like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent as a fast summary of overwhelming evidence.
Personally, I don't have conversations with dino collagen. Although that's another creationist, I also don't enter mystical non-duality mind states by perfect hand-banana communion, at least not edible ba, er I digress. :)
