<@KeithInc.> #189844
He’s a New Zealander, so he’d better know about kiwis and kakapos (flightless parrots). I can see how he was trying to speak generally, mind.
Meanwhile, evolution doesn’t deal in any kind of teleology. That’s what’s meant by “not complete”—nothing to imply that the form is set in diamond, “completed”, for all eternity, not when still further environmental flux is certain.
And I’m not impressed with the claim that horses were crafted strictly to be steeds. Less anthropocentrism, if you would?