“ARGUMENT PART 1 ( the atheistic view shown as a syllogism )
1) If God does not exist, then there is no logical reason for relying on logic. (Modus Tollens)”
I did a logic puzzle a while back. It said the catcher rides his bicycle to work. Mr. Wilson drives his pickup. You are telling me that the two statements can ONLY show that Mr. Wilson is not the catcher if logic is sponsored by the supreme intelligence of the universe?
What a laughable claim.
Logic works. Feel free to prove that a god is actually necessary for this tool to function.
“2) There is a logical reason for relying on logic. (Modus Tollens)”
Logic works, yes.
“C Therefore it is not the case that God does not exist or (God exists ( by negation.) Q.E.D.”
No. You’re making a non-sequitur until you can connect the two ideas.
Go ahead. We’ll wait.
“This brings an atheist to the question - What is the logical reason for relying on logic ?”
We observe results with logic.
We do not observe any gods.
“And that brings them to see that they believe in what they have not proved (only faith).”
Faith except for the evidence of results.
I do not see evidence for the connection you claim.
“They argue against God, because they want sufficient logical evidence, but they do so with the very tool they cannot or will not give sufficient logical evidence for. (Hypocrisy?)”
Bullshit. Logic works to evaluate ideas. YOU claim it requires god.
You offer no evidence for this statement, or even an argument.
Just the blank fiat.
“(So, they ACCUSE Theists of doing that which they do, shame...shame...shame. How inconsistent?)”
You are a smug, self-centered, lying sack of shit.