[Serious] Government provided gf's are the only way to stop society from collapsing
Birthrates would be above sustainable levels and violence would be heavily reduced.
37 comments
Birthrates would be above sustainable levels …you think that is a desirable thing??? Or do you just not know what the word means???
Seriously, “above sustainable levels” is per definitionem a bad thing.
(Compare Nomates the Trollcel telling me recently that I would benefit from a “repressive religious society”. Emphasis mine.)
@Bastethotep #31142
I think he just means above the minimum for sustenance (i.e. not going into freefall).
That said, he makes it sound like having a lover is some sort of panacea. More sources of misery than just lack of eros. Far more.
@Skyknight #31144
That said, he makes it sound like having a lover is some sort of panacea. More sources of misery than just lack of eros. Far more. Yes, but incels are some of the worst cases of the Golden Fantasy in history.
"How many men would still be miserable if they were provided a gf for life?"
All of you.
Sounds like a recipe for disaster. You'd get exactly what you asked for, but not what you expected, so the bitching would be worse, but the defense would be 'But that's what you said you WANTED!? So WTF!?!'
How many men would still be miserable if they were provided a gf for life? *raises hand*
@Bastethotep #31154
Government provided gf's are the only way to stop society from collapsing [Serious]
...now where have we heard that before, eh Mary Jane Lick Sick?!
'Mary'? Surely that should be Shirley ...?! [/"Airplane!"]
Here's a novel idea: How about earning what you get instead of expecting governments to hand out human beings for your gratification. And as other posters have mentioned, you still wouldn't be happy because you'd be looksmatched. And, if God has a sense of humour, personality-matched too.
So, everyone is to be provided with a girlfriend? What about those of us who would rather have a boyfriend? Oh, I forgot; only men are Real People…
How many women would BECOME miserable, if they were forced to be the girlfriend of some creepy low-life sod?
Do you mean above REPLACEMENT levels, dearie? Because being above SUSTAINABLE levels would be a disaster.
*Real* men don't need to force women to be their girlfriend. Real men who can't find love wouldn't even *want* that. So, I guess what I'm trying to say is, eat shit and die you worthless little prick.
Then society is just going to have to collapse.
All of these useless losers would still be miserable, because they are incapable of being anything but. It’s almost funny how they have yet to realize that.
@Bastethotep #31154
Kindred spirits lol, just a lie made up to tempt men away from the guaranteed arranged marriage system to what you have now
Do you honestly think there’s a woman out there who daydreams about a balding science enthusiast and part time watchdog?
Closest thing you have to a soulmate is probs sitting there with semen, spit and maybe some poo residue all drying up on her face rn
@Nomates #31260
I’m not sure why you think just receiving a woman would fix even a marked fraction of your woes. Do you really expect a woman would be satisfied being a bedmate, and little more? You make it sound like men expecting women to be more than bedmates at all to be some sort of heresy against Reality.
Although I should be interested to hear how you expect same-sex couples to fare. By your reasoning, male-male couples are the most fulfilling thing imaginable for both parties.
Kindred spirits lol, just a lie made up While I have yet to meet a woman with whom I clicked, for every trait I long for in a partner, I know at least one woman who possesses it.
guaranteed arranged marriage system Arranged marriage is a perversion, an abomination against love. Please take a swim with candirus and piranhas.
Do you honestly think there’s a woman out there who daydreams about a balding science enthusiast and part time watchdog? I am a scientist, not just a mere “science enthusiast”. No, I do not consider my pattern hair loss an appealing trait, but then, I never wanted a relationship that is primarily about appearence. And really, your oversimplification does not do me justice.What about you? Do you honestly think that all that incoherent, self-contradictory incel rubbish that cannot stand up to any sort of scrutinity is true? Do you honestly think that a religious dystopia, which you yourself described as “repressive”, would be beneficial?
Closest thing you have to a soulmate is probs sitting there with semen, spit and maybe some poo residue all drying up on her face rn Yuck. Keep your filthy fantasies to yourself, sicko.
@Bastethotep #31289
A repressive religious society is definitely beneficial, for some men anyway
The repressive training wheels that stop one kid from doing all the cool tricks are the same ones that protect the other kid from falling down and breaking his bones, you’re too proud and hopeful to admit you’re the kid who needs the wheels, so you advocate against them to your own ruin
@SomeApe #31339
Ah, but how could that be? As is well known, getting your dick wet is THE sole reason any man ever decided to get up from the bed in the morning, it is in fact the one and only driving force of mankind, at least in his terminally malfunctioning brain. I really do not think he can even conceive of anyone doing anything out of any other reason.
@Nomates #31343
Hmm, interesting point. I have seen you guys posting stuff from here or places like r/IncelTears and doing quite the same thing.
You keep on bringing up „secular feminism“. Can you explain to me what that means?
@Nomates #31328
First, don’t assume that “no eros” means “loveless”. You know what philia, storge, and agape are, yes?
Second, have you considered that some of us might be a- or demisexual, meaning that lack of eros barely bothers us, if at all? (I’m demi-.)
@Nomates #31343
You don't seem to know what watchdogging is. That's not what goes on here. No one has a link to any authorities to warn of the next E.R. or Falwell.
@Nomates #31260
Well.... I'm a straight woman and I think I would probably like it if my boyfriend was a science enthusiast. (science is cool) And, if he posted on a site like this (making him a "watchdog" according to you), well, then we'd have something in common! And, BTW, bald guys can be sexy, so... I guess what I'm trying to say is that you're full of shit (but, c'mon, you already know that, right?)
@SomeApe #31436
The average guy on incel forums is a buttsex conceived, preterm born white subhuman, why they do whatever they do idk
Crossposting to fill your woman respecting quotas seems to be a lifestyle on here though
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
