If science doesn't agree with the Bible, science still needs to catch up!
13 comments
Because the Bible has been so helpful with scientific progress. Like the verses on the firmament, being geocentric, being flat, how to breed spotted sheep, what organ controls thoughts and emotions, and many more.
Honestly the only thing I can think of that had been relevant lately is to cover your face and quarantine the sick when they have an infectious disease... but you idiots refused to do that one.
People are watching King Charles III’s coronation right now. They don’t need to be at Westminster Abbey to do so: just as millions didn’t need to be there when his mother was similarly crowned Queen.
So tell us where Television is mentioned in your BuyBull: hers in 1953 was the ‘Killer App’ for that technology becoming popular: as so many are watching her son’s right now via HD smart TVs
Or even outside their homes: via smartphones .
The only thing that needs to catch up here is you , Eric.
So basically this means that because of cognitive dissonance, you'd like science to become a corrupt lying enterprise instead of being about the scientific method and discovery of the world. It's the only way it would begin to promote known falsehoods, even if some were once believed to be true by some ancient humans. Oh, and by you. And BTW, even religious institutions don't agree on how to interpret those ancient texts on many levels, one of the reasons there are so many denominations... Ultimately, it's your personal beliefs about what some ancient people believed, versus a body of discoveries and facts about the world with ways to understand those and work with them (scientific theories).
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
