“Religion assumes to be true based on the thousands of writings supporting it.”
And editing. Lots of Christain writings were lost when the editors chose the books to include in the Bible. Gnosticism, for example, didn’t survive the process. And we’re TOLD that God wrote or inspired what’s left.
"Evolution assumes to be true”
Meh. ‘Best theory so far’ is not the same as ‘Truth.’
“based on the thousands of writings supporting it.”
Nope. It’s what they’re written ABOUT that evolution rests upon. All those scientific observations.
"Religion offers a liberty, freedom from evil and its damnation.”
Not really a liberty, though. You have to obey very strict rules.
“Evolution offers a liberty, freedom from "GOD" and the "holiness" "HE" requires.”
A blatant lie. Only creationists think evolution says ANYTHING about gods or religion. Science doesn’t DO the supernatural, so it doesn’t say SHIT about god or holiness.
"Religion assumes the ultimate wisdom, and that all opposition lack wisdom.”
But it’s not really religion. The bible lists sins, with no real explanation why they’re sinful. So there’s no way to actually apply acquired wisdom to situations that the bible authors didn’t anticipate.
“Evolution assumes the ultimate knowledge,"
No scientist does this. Everything in the textbooks is falsifiable or it’s not science.
"Religion offers enlightenment. Claiming all opposition is in ignorance and/or denial.”
As long as religion gets to define enlightenment.
“Evolution offers enlightenment. Claiming all opposition is in ignorance and/or denial.”
Knowing what evolution actually is allows us to see just how fucking ignorant the arguments against it really are. Such as the above.
“Is not Evolution just another religion/faith?”
A very carefully curated and selective list comparing the two to promote an agenda, not to seek the truth. And also, lies. So, no.