“Why does Obama oppose critical thinking about Darwin in science class?”
First off, citation? WHere does Obama oppose that?
Second, this isn’t critical thinking. This is ad hominem. Darwin’s dead. The science goes beyond what Darwin knew or could have known. Attacking him does nothing to or against the theory as it currently stands.
This is a wasted effort.
Even if Charles Darwin turned out to be a pedophile who raped children, then hunted them for sport on his property, the science still stands.
“Ideas have consequence,”
Doesn’t make the ideas less true, though.
In fact, no science proves or even tries to prove that there is no god. at best, it conflicts with Genesis taken literally. But that’s your problem, not science’s.
“as Barrack considers the fetus without human rights no matter how human it appears.”
Rights start at the shiny end of the birth canal, yes.
“Why slam the doors shut on the minds of students in public schools?”
Right, right, a teacher has them for 2 hours a day, 5 days a week. There’s NO WAY parents or a church can compete with that kind of control.
Also, it’s not the school’s job, duty, task or privilege to teach one or more religions to the students. Just the basics of science, language, history, maths, and maybe underwater BB stacking.