“Darwinists”
I accept evolutionary theory. I don’t worship Darwin.
“ rue the day I engage and pose common sense and scientific questions,”
No facts? Just questions? Yeah, no one rues questions, just idiots that won’t take the answers they get.
“so there’s not much chance of combat here.”
Why would there be combat? You’re impotent, asking questions from a POV that thinks ‘darwinism’ is a thing.
"I am merciless, apply pure logic and am not PC when it comes to scientific interrogation.”
No one’s asking for mercy. If you find a decent question to ask, more power to you. Not sure if your logic is any better than your theology, but g’head with that. And ‘PC’ is just an attempt to prevent accidental insult. I’m sure all your insults are intentional.
But, again, if a theory can be exposed by an idiot, it deserves to be exposed by an idiot. Go on with your attack self.
“No brag, just fact.”
Oh, it’s a brag, sure enough.
“I used to have faith in Darwinism,”
Then you used to be an idiot.
“but then I questioned it.”
Shocking.
“It just didn’t hold up and requires unbelievable suspension of disbelief.”
You saw a creationist website, didn’t you?
"It’s not intellectually sustainable and , in fact, fails right outta the starting gate.”
Uh huh. Sure. And you can show this AND stand around for the replies?
“As SHoward noted, it shouldn’t be dissected because of one’s religion, but because of it’s very bad “science”.”
But does anyone find this bad science without having a creationist religion? They seem to correlate pretty closely.
"Though, to be sure, no one who claims to be a genuine, small “o” orthodox Christian can also claim to believe in Darwinism, unless that person is confused about the faith.”
You just said you shouldn’t do that. And you did that. Much as I predicted.
Not a surprise at all, really.
“To coin a new phrase “Facts are stubborn things”. (ain’t they?)”
These ‘facts’ would be your relentless questions? And your failure to understand the answers?