Thoughts are correlated with physical events, namely synaptic activity in the brain. But that doesn’t mean that thoughts are merely synaptic activity in the brain, or that thinking ultimately comes from the brain, even though the brain is involved in thinking while we are alive.
Evidence needed. Claims and fantasies are only evidence of human imagination and there is much evidence that this happens due to neurology, too. Meaning that this is a denial statement and a false premise.
From a Christian perspective it is easy to show this. For one thing, we will continue to have thoughts even after death – after our brain ceases any activity at all (Luke 16:22-25).
We can't expect ancient humans to have known about what we have learned in the last century. Writen ideas are human language and communication, really not the same as thoughts of the mind in living brains. And your statement is evidence that you cannot even properly assess what really was in the author's mind when they wrote or attempted to transmit it. How ironic.
Logic cannot be material because it is not extended in space; you cannot see, hear, taste, touch, or smell logic. It’s not physical.
Human logic is a game of the human mind, sure. It does not mean that it doesn't result from neurology. There is evidence that it does and you lack evidence that it happens elsewhere to support your denial statement.
In the Christian worldview, we can have things like logic because we allow for non-material things to exist.
That's a huge leap of logic. In logic, we have logic, because logic works with human mind concepts and arguments. You need evidence for your claim that there's something else behind like "the divine" or that Christianity has anything to do with it, other than itself including traditions of idea transmission using normal means common to all culture.
"Christian worldview" is itself very subjective: you reject facts discovered about the world that many Christians acknowledge, for instance. The history of Christianity is full of sectarianism and mixing with other traditions. And it includes stories of wise men and a history that includes crimes against humanity. And this type of postmodern nonsense that you fell into, apparently aiming to return to the ignorance and savagery of the middle ages.
God Himself is non-material. Logic is the way that God thinks.
We're already past the false premises making this another grandiose assertion, but sure, human concepts of the divine are of human fantasies of the divine. You appear to have redefined "logic" as something else, something similar to "story" or "dogma". In the human traditions of claims attributed to imaginary beings like YHVH, there is much evidence that it is flawed and from humans, conflictual. There are many reasons for this, other than the purported original claims, such as tradition transmission and its own flaws (writing, copying, loss, addition, compilation, harmony, reconstruction, compilation)...
And since we are made in God’s image, our mind has awareness of logic and a limited ability to use logic to reason.
Another false premise therefore a flawed conclusion, derived from a rational justification to deny the evidence that human created deities obviously have human attributes. Then logic thinking is still philosophy one has to learn and acquire, like critical thinking. Well, it's indeed also true for the concepts of your faith.
What I really read there was: I want to be alienated and will keep alienating myself and hope that you also follow me down the rabbit hole of reality denial and fantasy.