All things considered, quality of life was better before women were "liberated".... and required to work in order to support the Great Welfare State and its millions of non-paying parasites.image
9 comments
Yeah, the GOP dismantling the social safety net, gutting tax rates, enabling crazy wealth inbalances, and allowing companies to screw over their employees has SUCKED.
It's unrelated to women voting though, for what that's worth.
OK, what they say in that picture is kinda GENERALLY true maybe….but as a guy whose parents both were born in the 50s, I can tell you it wasn’t quite like that for everybody, far from it. Neither of them grew up “rich” or anything. My dad’s parents were doing all right, not too shabby, but my dad sent HIMSELF to college eventually….and my mom’s family were barely scraping by, in what was NOT a good area at the time, at that.
Once upon a time in the 50s, the top marginal tax rate was 88%, hospitals didn’t charge godawful inflated prices for care, and affordable housing was a matter of municipal policy (at least in places that hadn’t been redlined). Oh … is that what waronwoke is really looking for, a return to redlining?
“All things considered, quality of life was better before women were liberated”
First of all, fuck your quotation marks, you do not decide what liberation is or is not above the heads of the directly affected parties. Second, even if every word in your sentence was true, it would still change nothing, as quality of life comes distant second to rights and freedoms guarantee. If our liberation makes you poorer and miserable, because you cannot coerce another adult to enter into a slave contract with you to wash and clean for your inbred ass, then it is still nothing to me.
“millions of non-paying parasites.”
Yes, ones just like you and other males of your convictions, deciding you somehow have the absolute right to be treated like you’re in a fucking hotel 24/7 by a woman you do not respect, nor compensate any type of enough for her constant work around you. Good thing we’ve done away with such parasitism.
Donald Fart is sure against the Welfare State, certainly it’s foundation: Socialised Healthcare.
The National Health Service: brought into being in 1948 by PM Clement Attlee, who was praised by Winston Churchill for implementing what had been previously planned for during WWII. Guess which PM is Conervative? Guess who made said plans?
Guess which PM Donald Fart loves, OP.
The only parasite in this instance is not only his opinion.
Plenty of women employed by the NHS: and not just as nurses …!
You know what else the 50s had that we don’t? The United States being one of the few industrial nations that WASN’T rebuilding itself from a devastating world war, and in turn most people had good-paying factory jobs and was governed by largely social democratic governance, we don’t have either now and that’s for shit not because the welfare program continued to exist (it came into existence during the great depression afterall) and women gaining more rights, in fact those things are largely disconnected, so your idea of STRIPPING WOMEN OF THEIR HARD FOUGHT RIGHTS will do FUCK ALL to restore the “oh-so Glory days” of the 1950s.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
