https://www.realhistorychan.com/anyt-06102021.html
"The most recognizable danger of "gender fluid" dressing for "straight" boys and men is that it carries with it the obvious potential for being a "gateway drug" into the dark world of gender confusion, tranniedom and sodomy. After an otherwise seemingly masculine boy or young man indulges that first temptation to dress "like a woman," how far can he be from wanting to have private parts like a women? Or, pardon the wee bit of vulgarity here --- desiring to take it like a woman? And what about the very little children seeing this abomination? What seeds are being planted in their fertile imaginations?"
That is not how gender identity or sexual orientation works: https://theconversation.com/stop-calling-it-a-choice-biological-factors-drive-homosexuality-122764
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/05/180524112351.htm
Its clear you care not for biology.
"However, none of that changes the fact that in every social grouping that has ever existed -- ranging from primitive tribes to advanced civilizations -- the little boys and the little girls were, in accordance with their true natures, separated and reared differently ---- as the grown men and women, in accordance with their true natures, were expected to act differently. Because there is clearly nothing "artificial" about the biological and psychological differences between the sexes -- the differences in learned behaviors such as dress, though they may vary greatly from culture to culture and century to century, are not "artificial social constructs" -- just varying manifestations of the timeless wisdom behind keeping the sexes opposite and apart, and thus compatible as natural complements to each other. The warriors of Scotland may have worn kilts -- but the womenfolk did not!"
Explain third genders then: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Non-binary_gender#Examples_of_traditional_cogender_identities
"From Africa to Asia to Europe --- Vastly different cultures, different continents, different eras, different styles --- yet the eternal natural principle of separate codes of dress and conduct for the sexes is common to all pre-Marxified peoples. Ironically, it is the "gender fluid" dress code which represents an "artificial social construct.""
Explain this: https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/03/20/breeching-boys/
https://historyofyesterday.com/yes-men-used-to-wear-dresses-high-heels-and-colour-pink-280dd5fa03bc?gi=bf9e73fe2e92
https://www.realhistorychan.com/anyt-06222021.html
"Oh well, no "tolerance" ™ for those of us who don't want sodomite "pride" fag-flags flying in our family's faces, I suppose. "Hey, look at me, everybody. I like hairy butt holes, and I'm "proud" of it!"
https://images.dailykos.com/images/409352/story_image/gaypride.jpg?1496612760
https://www.reddit.com/r/askgaybros/comments/cc3gnv/how_do_you_prove_that_aids_is_not_a_gay_disease/?
https://www.aclu.org/other/examples-sodomy-laws-used-discriminate-against-lesbian-and-gay-people
"thought that to be a reasonable position, as long as the butt-buggery and gerbil-stuffing (don't ask) was discreet and hidden from children especially."
The gerbil stuffing you give no evidence for: https://www.straightdope.com/21341657/is-it-true-what-they-say-about-gerbils
https://www.realhistorychan.com/anyt-03042021---homo-pedos-ruin-boy-scouts.html
"St. Sugar: Boobuss, you dolt! Thiss is what you get for ssupporting the ssodomite agenda!
Editor: And yet, none of our brave "conservatives" will make the connection between the 2015 homosexualization and all of these lawsuits coming just 5 years later!"
This was going on long before that: https://holybulliesandheadlessmonsters.blogspot.com/2020/02/stop-lying-family-research-council-gays.html
