It's difficult to analyse such confused woo. My first impression is that it's influenced by psychedelics or a condition, other than ignorance alone, producing random connections between unrelated ideas and distorting reality perception.
Evolution does not only study molecular processes. At the "atom level", to use the same language, the complex chemistry of carbon was involved in abiogenesis, life and evolution. As far as science knows, apart from illusions created by our brain and our mind, there are no "non-physical" objects or processes; what cannot be seen with our common senses but can have existence and effect, is still part of physics, the states of matter are also part of it and of chemistry. Electricity is also physics and chemistry.
As for our brain, it appears to function using biological, incredibly parallel electro-chemical processes (neurology, not relying on quantum effects either). It is both impressive in complexity as well as imperfect. It can best be explaned by evolutionary processes, like for the rest of our body and organs.
When studying evolution, molecules do play a role, our organs work by chemical conversion processes and our genetic code is molecular. In embryology, the development can also be observed at the molecular, cells and organ, anatomical levels.
DNA and embryology alone give incredible clues about the evolutionary processes and phases that led to mammals, primates and great apes like us. Still, there's much more than that, there's fossil evidence, geobiography, selection, speciation... In Darwin's time, much less was known, the genetic code had not been discovered yet. Darwin had a good idea of how organisms evolved and there was enough evidence to infer that, but the details are incredibly more understood today.
Small mutations may be random (but also influenced), but then natural selection processes are extremely important for populations to evolve and adapt. Mutations that are inheritable and are either beneficial, neutral or not deleterious enough can persist and express in future generations (not always every individual). The genetic code is not reset every generation, there is genetic memory. Then even in the same family and population the expression of natural variation is easily perceptible.
The straw men, analogies and reactionary arguments of creationists are easily shown to be wrong when studying the processes and the evidence. It is also very easy to begin with free online resources.
Basic processes such as descent with modification and selection can be computer simulated. Even if those are usually simplifications and designed models, they show that evolutionary processes are plausible. In fact, we even use genetic algorithms to develop some hardware/software applications, while not biological life, it uses similar practical principles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent