Are atheists embarrassed that Ray Comfort was easily able to disprove atheism with only a banana?
19 comments
disprove atheism
It’s probably obvious to most people reading this right now, but I’d just like to say it anyway…. “disproving atheism” makes no fucking sense! Atheism isn’t a thing you can prove or disprove, it’s just a lack of belief in any god. Lack of theism. That’s it, that is what the word fucking means.
“Are atheists embarrassed that Ray Comfort was easily able to disprove atheism with only a banana?”
I didn’t believe in any gods.
I WOULD be embarrassed if i took Ray’s failed argument to heart and believed in his god on such a flimsy premise.
But, no, not embarrassed.
Even besides the banana having undergone a good deal of human selection, I’d sooner expect creationism to be able to bring out at least thirty naturally-attuned-to-human-grip fruits/vegetables. Without dispensing everything non-human animals would need (you fancy Eternity without nuthatches, parrots, marine iguanas, etc.?!).
Ray Cumfart himself admitted he was wrong about the Banana.
No unknown, you are the trolled. And then the OP was a self -defeated zombie.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
