Marxism-Leninism is not only a straight heterosexual ideology but it is the ONLY heterosexual ideology.
All other ideologies have some perverse symbolism going on for them.
Here’s a scientific Freudian analysis that proves it:
Hammer and sickle: Symbolic heterosexual union of opposites. The passive and the active.
Swastika: Symbolic homosexual 4-way union. 4 aggressive active lines.
Hammer and sword: Symbolic homosexual union. 2 masculine symbols.
Fascist stick bundle: Symbolic bisexual union. 1 dominant masculine symbol. 1 dominated masculine symbol.
image
21 comments
“Hammer and sickle: Symbolic heterosexual union”
You look at a stack of two tools and see sex? The TOOLS are sexual partners?
Third-party screenshots are NOT an admissible source for quotes, and we may very well delete quotes sourced to them. Fortunately, I was able to find, and fix the source link to, the original.
Anyways, is the hammer or the sickle supposed to be the passive one? Because I am pretty sure neither is.
<@KeithInc. > #167013
Not to mention the fact that of a hammer and a sickle, he considers only ONE to be "active" while the other is "passive".
Like, buddy, have you never seen those tools actually being used?
So feminine is always passive?
Moreover, how can you assign genders to items such as hammers and sickles?
Nazism being homosexual might be very ironical compared to what the regime did to gays.
Fascist stick bundle: Symbolic bisexual union. 1 dominant masculine symbol. 1 dominated masculine symbol.
That's not what bisexuality is, you homophobic and misogynistic bellend. Bisexuality is finding both men and women sexually attractive. Based on your bizarre and warped definitions of masculine and feminine, you're describing a Masculine-Feminine Gay Couple , not a "bisexual union".
@Bastethotep #167019
Actually, both are passive. They do absolutely nothing, until someone picks them and uses them. The user, however, is active … or else the tools are not being used.
@Sasha #167032
Psychoanalysis was always wrong anyway :) Freud had influence and still has, but his premises and conclusions problematic and methods outdated, of course... And I note the "/s" :))
@JeanP
But, romance languages do :)
I'm really sorry for you if you're only limited to one-way interactions, or are privated from consensual, interactive, awesome sex, because of your own irrational taboos...
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
