FSTDT

NASA believes that the Sun a radiated body caused life on Earth, yet ancient documentation states that Light created life, not evil.

Sun worship, a burning body of energy light sound forms evil burnt bodies of radiation. Radiation attacked the Earth and caused her atmosphere to fall out as per ancient literature explains.

Radiation is supposed to be the result of origin creation as per scientific literature updates, yet origin creation quantifies that it was destroyed and transformed via our own awareness as conscious receiver of information, hence radiation the evil burnt body did not create life as previously supposed. Sun worship was therefore stopped as a religious practice.

By ancient religious version the previous Heaven Earth atmosphere was attacked by the Sun (Satan), and the Christ act (Oxygen) saved the life of Earth by stopping the radiation burn releasing a huge volume of water onto Planet Earth, causing radiation (Satan) to fall into the Earth body (stone). The empty atmosphere around the planet cut off the radiation attack of Earth.

Oxygen was created as the Christ Act in the previous origin formed atmosphere, and when the earth's volcanic eruptions released gases and vapor, the atmosphere was replaced from its act of destruction as fall out. Human remains pre dating the dinosaur era has proven this via archaeological discovery in coal bodies. Radiation burning the previous nature on Earth evidence of the coal beds containing human implements. Volcanic eruptions replaced the Earth face with new stone.

Oxygen therefore became the new atmospheric spirit of creation. Oxygen as a mass body therefore protects us from radiation attacking us as per documentation. Radiation quantifies that it is used by science to destroy cells allowing healthy cells to continue to produce.

If our consciousness, the state of our personal awareness believed that radiation created us, why would it protect its own body from radiation pollution when dealing with cancer victims? As consciousness demonstrates to advise us, it seems it already does.

Science looking for new creation theories are involved in the current day dilemma of falling out UFO bodies in their attempt to study the evolution of cellular matter. Believing in the radioactive creator theory (evil spirit) is therefore a new science theory proposed by the occult scientists.

NASA has demonstrated occult science exploration along with the Catholic Church........what else is there to say?

"Kindly give at least one example, drawing from your huge pool of Jewish and/or non-Jewish witnesses, of the alleged Nazi campaign of genocide.

I am actually a connoisseur of Holocaust stories. They run regularly in the Minneapolis Star Tribune here, and I always read them very closely. Usually they follow the same format, over and over. The "Holocaust survivor" recounts his experiences during the war. What he is quoted as saying is all consistent with what we know happened in WW2. For example, he may describe being sent to Auschwitz and being forced to work on building a road. He may say that his parents were sent to another camp and that he never heard from them again. He may describe hiding in the woods from the Nazis.

All these experiences could be, and very well may be true. The problem is that nowhere in these accounts is there any evidence, or even the assertion made, that the Nazis were engaged in any kind of genocide. We have all been so conditioned by decades of mind conditioning in films, TV shows, literary fiction, school curriculum, and so on, that these experiences occurred within the context of people being exterminated in gas chambers that we subconsciously assume that is the subtext of the stories. It is the editor of the publication that chimes in about the supposed exterminations, filling in the blanks between quotes from the subject.

Meanwhile, the "Holocaust survivor" never bothers to fill us in on awkward facts surrounding his experiences-- such as that his parents were sent to camps not because they were Jews, but because they were accused of swindling (like Anne Frank's father), or that he was chased in the woods by the Germans because he was engaged in partisan guerrilla activities against the Germans on behalf of the Communists, etc.

So, I suggest you try it next time you run across a "survivor" tale in your local newspaper-- which will probably be some time in the next week or so. Examine the words quoted of the survivor in question. Does he ever actually present any testimonial that he witnessed genocide of any kind? Chances are he doesn't, because he didn't. And neither did anyone else."