If you’re voting “for my daughter” & “reproductive freedom” then you’re fine with men using your little girl as an object for promiscuous sex, impregnating her with no commitment, & brutally killing your sweet grandbaby so more men can abuse your daughter.
It’s gross. Stop it.
For your daughter.
1:18 PM · Nov 3, 2024 · 149.6K Views
2,476 Reposts 78 Quotes 12.5K Likes 430 Bookmarks
14 comments
“If you’re voting “for my daughter” & “reproductive freedom” then you’re fine with men using your little girl as an object for promiscuous sex,”
I’m fine with her making choices and not fine with hateful fuckwits making her choices for her, is that okay?
“impregnating her with no commitment,”
Well, no, protecting her right to an abortion is the opposite of that.
“ & brutally killing your sweet grandbaby so more men can abuse your daughter.”
See, that’s YOU being a hateful fuck and making choices for your sake at her cost. Fuck all the way off, Liz.
“It’s gross. Stop it.”
Abortion bans are killing women RIGHT NOW. I want to stop THAT. Because it’s gross injustice.
“For your daughter.”
Right now, in way too many states, if my daughter had a problem pregnancy, or cancer, or a miscarriage, you’d have her die in great pain. Giving her the option is FOR her sake.
Oh yeah because none of that ever happened before Roe v. Wade.
Certain types of men having been running away from their responsibilities ever since the advent of responsibilities. Women used to be able to take care of those issues in privacy and in the care of the village midwife. Until Andrew Comstock, that is. Isn’t it amazing how sex obsessed weirdo men somehow make their obsession women’s problem to deal with? 🤢🤮
My reactions, in order:
1. How does your brain even work?!
2. Sounds like you live in a reality with *huge* problems which can only be solved by exterminating most of the men but keeping a few around for breeding, and even then abortion would still be useful as a limited stopgap solution until that was accomplished, so you’re still wrong.
3. More seriously, you’re expecting us to believe that the options are “rape, promiscuity, and abortion” or “none of those” and getting rid of abortion will eliminate rape and promiscuity, as if the three were co-dependent to or contingent on each other. It’s hard to disentangle what subtle effects they might have on each other because they’re all tangled up on so many other things, but the key here being subtle . Whatever black-and-white thinking produced this tweet includes one or more premises which are not even remotely how humans work.
Did you really just mean to imply sex and pregnancy are NEVER a choice for women and the only thing keeping every man on Earth from preying on every woman to cross their sight is the threat of being responsible for another human being which by further implication you don’t think is the case in marriage? That NOBODY actually wants children? That the threat of being forced into parenthood is such an incredibly terrifying prospect it far outweighs any legal repercussions rapists and domestic abusers will ever face thus they’d run wild with “only” the law to stop them and nobody would bat an eye at further negating a woman’s consent in the case of abortion as well? Because again, nobody actually gives a damn about women’s consent to anything? But at the same time, you know, everyone must bear children it is their reason to exist and there’s no excuse not to including inability to provide the bare minimum of care, an environment of constant resentment, or even certain death of fetus, mother, or BOTH with criminal penalty for surviving a miscarriage?
I don’t have a daughter but if I did I’d want her to live in a country where she can make the best informed decisions for herself, guided by sound medical science. I’d want her to live in a world where medical providers don’t have to worry about the police and can act decisively in situations where milliseconds matter. I’d want her to live in a state where professionals can offer her the full benefits of reproductive care and haven’t all fled or found other specialties because some federalist society lawyers think they know better. If she wanted to be more sexually active than me I’d want her to be able to make the best decisions and and ensure all parties fully, enthusiastically, and actively consented. If she were assaulted I’d want law enforcement to have the time, resources, and prioritization to thoroughly investigate the crime and forensic evidence and not treat her like the criminal for reporting her allegations.
One candidate promises a country where that could be possible. The other doesn’t.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.