“Evo/Atheist hypocrisy”
Bet a thousand quatloos it’s neither Evo nor Atheist hypocrisy, just creationist incomplete understanding.
“I find it so very interesting how atheists are so sure of themselves that there is no God,"
Well, if we weren’t sure, we wouldn’ tbe ‘atheists’ would we?
“and that all lifeforms somehow appeared and evolved randomly, without any sort of intelligence to either start or fuel the process.”
Ignorant statement #1. Not entire randomly.
"And even more interesting is how they seem so utterly confident in this illogical position.”
Well, you only mention about half of my position, so it doesn’t matter ifyou think it’s illogical.
Basically, YOU are saying MY position is “two plus equals four.” Yes, that is illogical.
O”f course, this mindset is ludicrous...”
I’d have said ‘dishonest,’ but ludicrous also works.
“and here's why: Evos/atheists (Yes, they're one in the same on this forum)”
More ignorance. Plenty of people believe in god and accept the science of evolution. They just don’t take everything in teh bible as literal.
Not quite as many people at atheists who do not accept evolution, but there are some. Guys asking the stupid questions like, ‘how do you know, were you there?’
"don't believe the universe was created by God, who by definition is a creator and thus capapble of creating...”
But i don’t believe gods are real, so defining the characteristics of fictional beings doesn’t really impact the discussion. And not all gods are creators.
“.....so essentially, what they don't believe in is an entity capable of creating existence.”
Kinda redundant but not wrong.
“So if that is the case, my question is this: if God (a capable entity) isn't responsible for existence, what is?....something not capable?”
I do not believe the existence of the universe demands an entity as creator, no.
“And how are you so sure of yourself when you don't really know what this non-capable thing is?”
You’re the one creating a strawman, here. Try again.
“Paradoxically, natural selection is claimed to be a creative entity (Darwin and his minions claim it's responsible for speciation and evolution as a whole),”
More of dat ign’ance. Natural Selection is PART of what drives evolution. And there’s no paradox, there, nitwit.
"yet it's never been tested scientifically or proven to produce a single thing or adapt even one population.”
You might want to check the literature on that, sweetie. You can find the reports easily enough, just search for places where creationists shout, “but THAT isn’t evolution!” Then scroll up a ways.
“So what we have is”
What you have is a bald-faced lie. A strawman view. A poor misunderstanding of what science is and requires and what the theory of evolution has provided.
“Does anyone else see the hypocrisy and religiousness of this?”
Yes, creationists are ALL THE TIME pretending that their bullshit is actually science, but it doesn’t come anywhere close. So they’re lying for Jesus’ sake.