“[OP of "Understanding Consent"]”
A better title might be ‘Wilfully Misunderstanding Consent.’
“The legal and moral issue of a minor's ability to consent is the main problem preventing the acceptance of MAPs and pedosexuals in Western society.”
Yes…
“This post seeks to provide a solution to the question of consent.”
I wasn’t aware that it needed a solution.
“Can a minor consent?
The short answer is yes, minors can consent to a sexual relationship.”
No. Willingness is a choice, ‘consent’ is a legal term. We don’t let minors sign contracts to buy houses or join the military exactly because they are unable to consent to the issues the don’t understand.
“While they often do not understand the concept of relationships,”
Therefore making it NOT CONSENT.
“What is consent?
In common speech,”
Not to be confused with the legal impediment to you legally fucking a child.
“How can consent be determined?”
If they’re a minor, they cannot.
“Is it morally wrong to misinterpret consent?
No,”
The concern is that you’re harming a minor.
CHOOSING to misinterpret their consent is unnecessary harm.
That’s rape. That’s BAD rape. That’s special circle of Hell rape.
"Always remember that accidents are unavoidable and aren't always your fault.”
If you did EVERYTHING IN YOUR POWER to avoid an accident, then maybe. If you’re going to shrug and pay the kid’s parents off, that’s your fault.
“And as it is typically not possible for our desires to be otherwise satisfied, our actions are very much justified.”
No. No they are not.
No desires that INVOLVED BREAKING THE LAW are justified by the law or by your redefinition of words.