Teaching Darwinism in schools as if it is either the truth, or legitimate science, is a crime against humanity.

By the way, America was founded by Bible-believing Christians called Puritans who accepted the Bible and who rejected your evolution mythology. So if you don't like Bible-believing Christians, then logically you should get the heck out of America right now, and take all of your darwinist ilk with you. yuk yuk.

A) To call baby murderers "people" is a huge stretch. People have basic moral decency and humanity. Baby murderers, on the other hand, are psychopaths with no empathy and no conscience who are far more akin to inhuman monsters than they are to people.

B) Stating facts is not "insults." On the other hand, you calling babies "not persons" in order to "justify" murdering them is the gravest of insults to the hundreds of billions of babies who have been and will continue be brutally & barbarically murdered in the 'abortion' holocaust for which you advocate.

As you know, God is a Masculine Male Father Patriarch King, and He has a Big Whopping Penis that evildoers such as yourself will have to kneel before at His Judgement Seat, shortly before He casts you into Hell.

Rather, an article written by a real Christian would affirm the truth that God's Word stands, and when the so-called "science" of man contradicts, that is because the science of man is wrong. That's the real defense of God and the Bible.

"Virtually all shows before 1970 could be described as wholesome, with nothing more than slight suggestive lines in such programs as Batman, as mentioned elsewhere here."

That's not always true. For example the Twilight Zone (1959) is full of foul language its characters often take the LORD's name in vain. It is also full of immoral lines, such as: one time an old man tells a kid to "go play with a switchblade," another time a character talks about "slitting wrists," and many other times the characters talk frankly about fornicating and/or committing adultery and/or are depicted actually doing so on-screen (granted, it doesn't actually show them doing the final part of those things, but the images strongly suggest that they are about to...and the blunt dialogue outright blatantly admits it). It's definitely nowhere close to being wholesome.

But maybe the Twilight Zone was the first trashy show, and an anomaly for its time? I'm not sure about that, but I do know that even if it's the only show to do so, it definitely makes its era of TV impure and untrustworthy.

I was actually shocked to discover those things in the Twilight Zone, since LITB directly references it in one episode, and that's how LITB referred me to it. Because of the referral and the time when it was made, I was expecting it to be wholesome like LITB, but it quickly took a huge steamin' dump all over that reasonable expectation.

I do agree though that in general, TV became a lot more trashy after the 60's.

I don't commit Onanism and neither does Kirk [Cameron]. Stop projecting your own sick behaviors onto us.

It [the morning after pill] may or may not be murdering babies. It depends if it is or is not being used to murder a baby in the form of a fertilized egg. AFAIK there is no way to guarantee that it wouldn't murder a baby though, so non-murderers shouldn't ever take it. However, I'm not an expert on that point, so if there is one that guarantees not to murder a fertilized egg baby, then taking that would not be murdering babies.

What truly is terrible, terrible, is his promotion of darwinist propaganda and wanting it to have a monopoly so it can brainwash everyone to join his religion of darwinism and achieve his desired 100% darwinism belief rate/hivemind that all darwinists crave desperately. It's bad enough he doesn't care about damning his own soul, but wanting others to share in his damnation, well that's just sick.

Creationism is not equal to evolution. Rather, Creationism is far superior to evolution. Scientifically, morally, and spiritually. darwinism is an inherently evil worldview, whereas Creationism is an inherently good worldview.

Tonight I was watching an old Stallone film called Cobra that I picked up in the Walmart bargain bin for 5 bucks a year or two ago but never bothered to watch until now.

I was pretty bored by what seemed like a very dumb plot...a huge cult of psycho killers committing tons of murders yet the police thought it was just one man and had no knowledge whatsoever of this cult's existence in their own city. It was way too far-fetched to believe. Plus, it didn't even make sense what the motivations of the cultists were, as this was unexplained for most of the movie other than to say they wanted a "New World Order".

But then something very interesting happened at the end...the psycho serial killer cult leader said: "We kill the weak so that the strong survive!" and then I instantly thought of this board and darwinism and how that character was pretty much doing exactly what you all believe darwinism can and should do.

From then on I could no longer see this as just a dumb movie, but had to realize how disturbing it is that something like this could actually happen because what the character said is completely in line with the darwinist mindset, and being a darwinist is so common these days that no one would even notice for quite a while when they start getting together and acting on all their darwinist beliefs.

Which brings me to my question: darwinists, do you relate to the villain from the Stallone film Cobra?

Who do you think murdered the ~65 million Americans and ~2 billion people worldwide via 'abortion?' It wasn't Bible-believing a.k.a. real Christians. No, it was darwinists/atheists/liberals/feminists/SJWs etc., exactly like you and the other posters in this thread (many of whom have openly admitted that they support that holocaust, including mamu and graham...and your failure to condemn it seems to imply that you support it too) except for myself. The blood of those millions/billions of murder victims are on your kind's hands. Your kind is responsible for committing the biggest atrocity/holocaust/crime against humanity/genocide in the history of humanity! Nothing else even comes close.

the good part about this is that when God decides to rain down Fire & Brimstone upon these evil-doers [or whatever sort of other punishment He sees fit], He only has to target one very-specific building in order to nuke a whole whackload of them at once. this is essentially making God's job a lot easier. for that reason, i'm all for it.

and, it takes a lot of diseases like A.I.D.S. out of the public system so normal kids don't get it by accident, like the guys who would normally be beating up these "gay" kids and making them bleed. the amount of pestilence-carrying students will be dramatically decreased in schools which have these these "gay kids" removed to go to their own "gay school". for that reason, i'm all for it yet again

[What are your arguments exactly to support fascism? What do you call fascism exactly?]

i didn't read a bunch of technical jargon and hot air on the subject so i can't answer in a "formal" way but here's the way i see it:

the average person is a blithering idiot. so why then, would it make sense to have a mob of blithering idiots elect a government???! these blithering idiots are naturally going to elect a government which is also full of blithering idiots! is that "progress"? i say not.

think of Facism as a game of "Lemmings". the average person is a Lemming. The Facist Leader is the guy who controls the Lemmings for their own best interests to be met (ie: the "player" in a game of Lemmings).

better to have a genius who knows what he's doing take control of the blithering idiots and tell them what's good for them, since he knows better what is good for them than they do, because they are blithering idiots.

secondly, one thing the Bible says is true which can basically be summed up as: "All men are born evil". since all men are naturally evil, if given the opportunity en massse, they will naturally elect an EVIL lot of blithering idiots to make their laws. this results in the immoral cesspool-esque society that is now North America. if one righteous man takes charge, he can purge much of this evil away from the society and make it somewhat moral. you may say, "but the man in charge would be evil, too!" and yes that is true to some degree; but a smart, devoted man with strong convictions is still far less evil than your Average Joe Blithering.

There is no such thing as 'fetus.' 'Fetus' is in fact just another synonym for the word 'baby, a synonym which feminists use to try to gloss over their acts of murder and pretend they are not murdering babies, even though they are.

Just like the word 'abortion' when applied to humans is just another name for 'murder,' again meant to pretend that feminists' acts of murder are not murder.

In other words, a baby by the name of 'fetus' is still a baby, and a murder by the name of 'abortion' is still murder. Playing semantic word games does not change those facts.

Can you blame them? They are always called "retards," "idiots," "morons," "fundies" and all kinds of other horrible names. They often get slandered, stalked, and have their property stolen and changed by crazy atheist psychopaths, including many right here who use IMDB as a platform to do those things.

xtians are perfect saints in comparison to the infinitely more abusive atheists that they have to put up with.

Every Christian since the dawn of time has always known that God has a Penis. I tried to clarify that fact for ignorant atheists who mis-stated the fact, and falsely claimed that I said God was biological, which is something that I never said.

You and your cabal of atheist pals - most of whom are thieves and stalkers - may laugh it up because you are immature, but that's the truth and that's what the Bible says. If you were mature than you would not find it hilarious every time someone says "Penis," and you would not mock God's Word. But as a Bible denialist who serves mammon rather than God, that is of course not what you do.

Satan buried all the fossils of the mythical ape-man in places that can never be found in order to test darwinists' faith in his religion of darwinism.

It's a bad sign when you have to make up *beep*

I have no idea what you mean by that. That statement is incoherent. I made nothing up.

I could easily ask other creationists what they think about God having a penis,

There is no such thing as "creationists" as distinct from "Christians." All Christians believe the Bible, and therefore all Christians know that God is Male and has a Penis.

Anyone who denies those facts would be a denier of the Bible, and therefore, by definition, not a Christian.

they'd answer that whoever believes that belongs in an asylum.

No they wouldn't. If asylums came up at all, then they would say that Bible deniers such as yourself should be in them.

Even amongst other creationists, you'd be a laughingstock.

No I wouldn't. As I said, all legitimate Christians believe the Bible, and the Bible makes 100% clear that God has a Penis, therefore no legitimate Christian would deny that truth.

But let's pretend you did find people who profess to believe in the Bible whilst, in actuality, they deny it. And those people laugh at me. Would I care? No. Because God and I get the last laugh together as we are partying it up forever in Heaven, wherein the mocking Bible deniers of which you speak shall never enter.

God has many aspects, so it's very hard to put Him into the little box of a "definition." But here are some of His key traits:

- He is the Alpha and Omega, the Beginning and the End. He was never born and He can never die. He is eternal.

- He is Male and He has a Holy Righteous Penis. darwinists/atheists generally find this fact to be the most hilarious thing ever. Apparently they think that their own worshiping of a she-god and/or eunuch god - which is what they expect the real God to be rather than the Male that He is - is somehow less hilarious! I have no idea how darwinists/atheists came to believe in the whacky bizarre-o idea that God is a she-god and/or eunuch god. The most likely explanation is feminism must have rotted their brains.

- He created man in His image, meaning He must somewhat look like the most perfect and glorified man who ever existed...except that is not quite an accurate way to describe Him because He also looks infinitely superior to any man who ever existed...but there is no better way to describe Him than I've done in this paragraph, since words are insufficient to do that job.

- He Created the Universe and everything in it, along with Heaven and Hell. One caveat: the Universe is and has been in a fallen state since the fall of Man, so what we have now is in no way representative of the perfection that God initially created.

. . .

- God sent His son, Jesus Christ, to earth, to mitigate Adam & Eve's destruction of mankind, by letting Jesus die in the stead of mankind, so that those who accept Jesus' shed blood as proxy payment for their sin debts may be cleansed and allowed to enter Heaven instead of spending eternity in Hell. This was accomplished by Jesus' miraculous Virgin Birth, which allowed Jesus to be the only post-Eve human - ever - who was not born in sin.

. . .

If you want to know more about God, OP, then you should read the Bible and join a Bible-believing church...but you have to be very careful, because most churches that exists nowadays are apostate churches that deny rather than believe in the Bible (even though apostate churches often lyingly claim to believe in the Bible).

And let's not forget the biggest crime against humanity atrocity of all-time!

feminists went to the supreme court of the u.s. and said, "We want the right to murder babies before they are born and never to be prosecuted for our crimes!"

A few judges said: "Don't worry, we are evil just like you, so we want everyone to murder babies as much as you do. Therefore, we will make murdering unborn babies legal."

As a result, america started its own holocaust which has now "legally" murdered well-over 10 times as many people as hitler murdered in his holocaust. And there is no end to the american-made holocaust in sight! Even though murder is plainly against the law, but corrupt evil psychopath judges allow murder simultaneously "not" to be against the law too.

And america is just one country out of many wherein the exact scenario that I've just described has happened and wherein those countries' own "legal" holocausts also continue.

So all that proves beyond any doubt that the ideas that courts are good or that courts follow the law are completely bunk.

"If a woman has (the right to an abortion), why shouldn't a man be free to use his superior strength to force himself on a woman? At least the rapist's pursuit of sexual freedom doesn't (in most cases) result in anyone's death." Lawrence Lockman (R-ME)

Contrary to what you are trying to imply, that comment is not endorsing rape. Rather, it is pointing out that baby murderers are even sicker and more evil than rapists are, yet the same psychopath liberals who claim to be outraged by rapists also praise baby murderers, encourage the murdering of babies, and murder their own babies, and want those acts of murders to be legal so that they can get away with their crimes against humanity scott-free. The purpose of his example is solely to demonstrate the insanity of baby murderers who use words like "sexual freedom" to 'justify' murder.

That point is 100% valid. Shame on you for lumping it in with sick quotations that are not valid. Are you doing so as a way to try and defend the psychopathic barbaric murdering of babies in the 'abortion' holocaust? Shame, shame shame!

I think the problem is that the words "woman" and "women" and "female" have lost all their meaning since liberals now inappropriately include non-female monsters under those labels.

Therefore, before they allow someone to vote, they first need to vet every so-called woman rigorously to determine if she or it ("it" is the designator for so-called "women" who fail the vetting process) is a woman or not. I.e. The media calls hillary clinton a woman, but hillary is a monster, not a woman. It would never pass the vetting process. Nor would other monsters like itself (i.e. 99% of the other so-called "women" that the liberal media promotes).

Satan is what you would call a "Creationist." Satan knows full-well that everything the Bible says in Genesis (and everywhere else too) is true. He was there!

The reason Satan invented darwinism is because he is the Father of Lies and Author of Confusion and he hates for people to know the truth as God declares it in the Bible. And he also hates for people to go to Heaven and avoid joining him in Hell...which is another of his main motivations to invent darwinism.

So if you want to admire Satan for something, then admire him for his wisdom in being what you would call a "Creationist." But don't be a dupe in his plan who believes the lies that he made up for the purpose of luring people into Hell.

Inherit the Wind is biased, shameful, pro-Evolution propaganda.

The entire purpose of Inherit the Wind is to push the agenda that the theory of evolution is fact that should be taught in public schools. At the same time, Christianity is bashed in this movie and portrayed as wrong. Those who believe in Christianity in this movie are hatefully portrayed by the movie as idiots. The Atheist teacher who indoctrinates his students with Atheism & Evolution is portrayed as a hero and genius, as are all the other Atheists/Evolutionists in the movie. Inherit the Wind urges all it's viewers to take these sick 'lessons' to heart in real-life and hate & suppress Christians and any anyone who refuses to agree that Atheism and/or Evolution is correct and must be forced down everyone's throat against their will in schools.

In reality, the theory of evolution is not fact, never has been fact, and never will be fact. If anyone thinks Evolution is correct, that is only an *opinion.* The way Inherit the Wind serves as pro-Evolution propaganda is a disgrace and slap in the face to film-making, God, Christianity, and mankind as a species.

The fact that this movie and play is sometimes served up to unwitting students as a mandatory part of their public education is nothing short of disgusting! They want to brainwash the youths to hate Christianity and believe in Evolution, just like the "heroes" of the movie and play do. This is *not* educational, it's disgusting propaganda in it's worst form.

Inherit the Wind has the bald-faced *gall* to have a line spoken in the movie which says anyone who doesn't believe in Atheism & Evolution is dead. The strong, direct meaning of this line is that even while they are alive physically, they are 'brain-dead' for not accepting Atheism and Evolution. Could a movie *possibly* be any more disgusting and shameful propaganda? No, no it can't.

"Inherit the Wind" is a phrase taken directly from the Bible - a Holy Book which the movie bashes wickedly as much as it possibly can. The filmmakers/playwrights might have thought it was "funny" to title their movie after the words in the Bible, only to then viciously bash the Bible with the movie. It is doubtful though, that they *still* found it funny after their lives on Earth and run their natural course, and they came face to face with the God who they were so keen to bash and fight against by making this movie during their fleeting time on Earth. Inherit the Wind was made in 1960. It's now 2008. Using common sense, it's easy to figure out where the filmmakers/playwrights are now. And it's *not* in a happy place with a smile on their face for bashing God & Christianity in their brief moment on Earth when it was "funny" to do so.

Guess in the end, it goes to show that contrary to what Inherit the Wind claims, it's not those who believe in God and reject Evolution who are brain-dead after all.

In my previous posts, I forgot to mention another reason why I mention God's Penis a lot: you caused me to, by your many denials of the fact of God's Penis! You frequently refer to God as he/she. Should I start assuming that you call God he/she all the time because you have a fixation for he/she's? That is the kind of "logic" you apply to me when you make ludicrous assumptions about me based on me stating the facts of God's Holy, Righteous Penis! So if I am fixated with God's Penis, then you are equally fixated with your false god's he/sheness!

[about a study showing increased porn consumption in conservative states]

The info doesn't really prove what the article writers is trying to spin it to prove. Hence, as usual, this article is more shady darwinist propaganda.

All those states analyzed have plenty of darwinists in them, and the darwinists are the ones who make up those stats of porn consumers.

To accurately say otherwise (ie: for the article in the OP to not be darwinist propaganda), darwinists would have to be segregated into their own state, and then make an analysis. But darwinists don't care about truth enough to do that. Apparently they can fool enough dumbasses to sympathize with them with propaganda articles like the one in the OP.

IMDB boards were the glasses, and that's why they are being taken away!

For the most part, IMDB boards allowed freedom of speech...with the caveat that trolls could make false reports to have legitimate posts deleted for an illegitimate reason.

But the liberal agenda/ideology hates freedom of speech. It wants people only to be allowed to say things that support it and help it to perpetuate itself.

The liberal agenda/ideology never wants people to be able to say anything that criticizes itself.

When boards like this were made, their liberal creators assumed that everyone who used them would push the liberal agenda like the board creators wanted. But, they did not anticipate that normal/moral people still existed in today's day and age, and that those normal/moral people would resist their liberal tyranny.

Years later, liberals have finally come to realize that normal/moral people do still exist, and if allowed to speak, they will resist the evil liberal agenda.

The liberal overseers' solution to that problem is to take away normal/moral people's voices. That's why IMDB's message boards are closing. That's also why many/most media outlets have shutdown their comments section within the last year or two. That's also why many countries have made/continue to make laws that forbid free speech, and only allow speech that aligns with the evil liberal agenda.

If any good/normal/moral/non-liberals read this message, then I urge you always to continue to resist evil liberal tyranny, no matter how much they try to silence you. Keep fighting the good fight, my brothers and sisters!

Hold down a job? What are you talking about? Back in the day when good & normal families were the norm (in contrast to the current norm which is terrible & broken families), women did not "hold down a job." Rather, their husbands bought everything for them and paid all their bills. In addition, they also owned 50% of all of their husbands' property and income, simply by existing.

As the character Wally Cleaver says in the show Leave it to Beaver, women under this arrangement "had it made!"

Research has proven time and time again that women were a lot happier living those good lives in normal families than they are today, when they instead lead broken homes, act like men, and worship their careers (as if any of that could ever make a woman happy, LOL!)

Only in the twisted fantasies of liberal revisionist history are the miserable lives that women lead today a "good" thing.

"You cannot honestly think that a chef accidentally stabbing his finger on a snake's tooth involved planning on the part of the snake."

What you said is not what happened. What really happened was this:

The severed snake head spent 20 minutes pretending to be dead, then woke up and bit the chef to death at the exact moment when it noticed that it had the chance. The serpent, using only its long ago severed head, performed the ultimate in cunning ambush. It's like a scene from a horror movie except it happened in real-life, because the chef underestimated the cunning of the serpent.

I feel bad for the chef dying, but maybe if he paid more attention to the Bible he would have realized that screwing around with serpents is a bad idea, and underestimating their powers of evil and cunning are especially bad ideas, hence he would not be dead now.

The God of the Bible is an angry jealous God. He says so quite clearly many times over. He is a tough guy. He does not tolerate any nonsense, and will not be mocked. He places His worth above everything else because He is the most important thing in the universe. If you created the universe, would *YOU* tolerate miniscule, filthy, immoral, repuganant creatures that you made to disrespect you by taking your name in Vain etc.? k bad example, *you* probably would, but most normal people would not. it is perfectly reasonable for the Head Honcho to call the shots and demand respect for Himself as one of the most important laws.

I've never publicly posed like a whore to encourage lustful men to commit Onanism to me. On the other hand, Melissa Joan did. That fact is indisputable.

Right now I am having propaganda being shoved down my throat by a supposedly-reputable "NEWS"cast. This propaganda is advocating the freakish, abominable act of Satanism known as Test Tube Babies, or IVF.

Man is not God. Man should not pretend to be God. Test Tube Babies is going wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too far.

All Test Tube Babies as well as anyone who in any way participates in any procedures that relate to the creation of such Abominations or laws that allow it - should be executed without trial.

Test Tube Babies are Unholy Abominations and just plain ol' Freaks of Nature.

For Men who see fit to play God, it's time for them to be executed without delay and go have some "Quality Time" with the one and only REAL God; whereupon they will receive just recompense for their participation in the evil, ungodly Test Tube Baby Satanic Rituals.

[What about people who cant have children but can if they put them in a test tube?]

then they weren't meant to have children! so they should stop OBSESSING over something they weren't meant to have!!!

i'd like to make $20 Million a year as a Professional Athlete, what about me?HuhHuh!!!!!!!!!! I can't do it, but I really really really want to!!!! So why doesn't someone invent a barbaric, demonic procedure to help ME out with what *I* want?

the reason: because I am not obsessed with trying to have what I was not meant to have! but with Test Tube Babies, there are tons of mentally-deranged sickos whose illness causes them to do perverted things like obsess over things they have no need to obsess over; and these obsessions cause them to partake in demonic acts such as making Test Tube Babies

[statements in quotes are from the poster Navaros was answering]

"then why does Tessa Thompson’s character’s boyfriend, a white man, come off as the character who’s the most honest, has the most integrity and isn’t vilified for his skin color? "

He doesn't. You make it sound like he is some kind of deep, multi-dimensional character! ROFL. He's a one-dimensional cardboard cut-out. His only point in the film is to provide sex scenes which demonstrate that the main heroine character is a slut. But of course, being liberal nutjob propaganda, the film tries to represent her sluttiness as a good thing to be glorified.

And yes, he is vilified for his skin color by the black thugs who hate him because he is banging the heroine slut that they want all to themselves (even though some of them are also banging her simultaneously).

"by the way, “racistly" isn’t a word."

If I say it, it's a word. If it wasn't a word before I said it, then it has become a word henceforth after I've said it.

"it needs to start with thorough education on all parties to teach people from an early age the harm of superiority."

If you really believe that, then you should be condemning this film and this TV show for promoting black superiority.

[about the scientific method]

What you should do is:

1) Stop assuming darwinism is true just because you want it to be true.

2) Stop lying all the time by saying that evolution is fact, science, and has evidence; it is not, and is not, and has none.

3) Repent from your ungodly lifestyle and behaviours.

4) Stop pretending that you would ever discard darwinism; because you darn well know that you will always believe it is true, no matter what, period and you and your kind spin any and all evidence that destroys it as 'evidence for it '. Put more simply, stop trying to fool the naive into believing darwinism is science and you are open-minded enough to discard darwinism one day; because everyone knows that is just more lies from you (you must be taking lessons from ken miller who told similar lies at the Dover trial...or maybe its just all part of the standard darwinist playbook).

liberals want to brainwash everyone into believing the lie that the evil cesspool scum world they have created has always been the one and only world that exists, in order so people become fooled into believing that no alternative exists to said liberal evil cesspool scum world.

In reality, however, the 1950's was a utopia of paradise compared to the modern day liberal evil cesspool scum world.

The thread title is an oxymoron. Christianity and politics are the same thing - not different things, as the thread tile implies.

I.e. Christians are obligated to oppose evil, and one cannot oppose evil without at the same time clashing with evildoers who promote a political agenda about indulging in evil.

Please pay special attention to my OP in the thread "Farewell to the darwinists!" since I won't be able directly to guide with you my wisdom soon because the board Apocalypse is nigh. So I leave that thread's OP with you as the perfect tome of future guidance for the entire rest of your life. And that goes for the other darwinists too. You and/or them can thank me when we meet in Heaven - that's if you and them take the advice in my perfect tome of wisdom. If not, I'll be in Heaven and the rest of you never will be.

I cannot fathom why darwinists like yourself are fascinated by plain-as-day, self-evident, blatantly obvious, common knowledge truth. My statement about being God's #1 Spokesman is as obvious as statements like "the grass is green." It is so obvious that it goes without saying.

The same is also true for my statements about God's Holy, Righteous Penis. That too is plain-as-day, self-evident, blatantly obvious, common knowledge truth. Yet darwinists treat me like I'm a genius since they believe I'm the first one who ever discovered it. It has been known since the dawn of mankind, starting with Adam & Eve! One time a crazy darwinist even falsely accused me of "plagiarizing him" on the false grounds that he "invented" the common knowledge of God's Holy, Righteous Penis. If anything, he plagiarized me because he learned about God's Holy Righteous Penis for the first time from my public posts about It on this board...except that you can't really plagiarize common knowledge like that nut falsely claimed I did to him. What a liar! What a kook! . . .

if I had to make a name for myself, then I am the God's Front of Holy Righteousness And Annihilator of Evil.

Fundamentalists:

1. Originated in the 1900s A.D.

2. Formed as a response to the apostate church that came before them.

3. Presuppose that the apostate church to which they responded has some legitimacy.

In contrast, the godly kind of Navaros a.k.a. the real church of God:

1. Originated at the dawn of mankind, with Adam.

2. Is not a response to the apostate church. In fact, the opposite is true - the apostate church is a [evil, debased, corrupted] response to the real church of God a.k.a the godly kind of Navaros.

3. Fully and unequivocally renounces all apostasy, and does not afford even the smallest iota of legitimacy to the apostate church.

Therefore, contrary to your implications, your attempt to label me as a "fundamentalist" is a fail. They may have some similarities to me in that I believe in the Bible and they do too, but they also have major differences to me (which I've just described) that distinguish them as not quite up to par to God's standards, in contrast to myself, who is as perfect of a representative of God as has ever been on the earth after the time of the Apostles.

In recent months, Liberty University has endorsed Trump. That made me lose some respect for Liberty University. They should be able easily to discern that Trump is an liberal/evil man who does not believe in Christian/normal-non-psychopathic person values like preventing the murders of unborn babies.

I am disappointed that LU has made such a grievous moral error.

That's highly debatable. paganism is just an offshoot of satanism (satan is the head false god demon who runs both of those religions) so I'll use the word "paganism" simultaneously to describe both.

paganism was very dominant for an extremely long time. It had a decline for a few centuries, but then it came back in the 1800's in the form of darwinism, and darwinism (thus paganism) now dominates society with its evil iron fist.

Your definitions of "species" are completely arbitrary.

And moreover, they don't work either. I.e., darwinists claim that different species can't interbreed, even though species that aren't "supposed" to be able to interbreed can do so, and even though darwinists also paradoxically, at the same time, INSANELY, make an antithetical claim that debunks their very own other claim, that different species can interbreed!

To wit,

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-skull-could-be-from-human-group-that-interbred-with-neandertals/

New Skull Could Be from Human Group that Interbred with Neandertals

What?! So your definition of species is based on the fact that they can't interbreed with one another, except for when they can?!?!?!?!?!??!?!!? truthy, can I get an AMEN (or at least a HEEHARHAWWWW or something???) for how LUDICROUS darwinists' insane & non-functional definition" of species is?!?!??!?!?!?!

darwinists call something a "different species" or not based on subjective opinion-based judgements.

What you call "speciation" is, in actuality, merely variation within a single kind of life. It is not, as your evolution story requires, evidence of lower forms of life transforming into new, higher forms of life.

Now, let's pretend for a moment that I didn't have any of the evidence which I just used to destroy your "specieation" argument (that evidence, by the way, is just one drop in the bucket)...

Even if darwinists did legitimately observe some "specieation"...that would still be grossly insufficient to prove their outlandish claims. darwinists claim that bacteria "descended" into all forms of life. So unless/until they observe every single one of those alleged transformations of "specieation," then their extraordinary claim of "common descent of all life forms from bacteria" will remain the unproven faith-based belief that it has always been.

And not surprisingly, atheists/darwinists/liberals advocate for exactly that. They encourage people to smoke crack and heroin and meth and everything else that will ruin their bodies & their lives and kill them. And they want the state to pay for running houses in which people ruin themselves in those ways! They call them things like "injection sites" but an accurate name would be "Abomination of Hell sites."

All of which just goes to show yet again that without God, humans become unimaginably evil.

Then how come 99-100% of your fellow darwinists are crazy and love to kill? Especially unborn babies, who they've killed billions of and continue to do so on a daily basis.

So since you are not crazy and you are against killing, or so you say, then my questions to you are:

1. Like I just asked, why are 99-100% of your fellow darwinists crazies who love to kill?

2. Do you yourself support the mass killings of unborn babies as long as those killings are labeled with a false label euphemism in order to pretend that they are not murders? [Common false label euphemisms that darwinists use to "justify" murdering babies include "abortion," "fetus," "choice," "reproductive rights," women's rights" etc.]

3. Will you renounce those 99-100% of darwinists who are evil crazy baby killers?

(from a discussion of the movie Pleasantville, when asked why he'd called the film evil):

I haven't seen this since I was tricked into doing so when it was originally in the theaters, therefore my answer won't be as comprehensive as it could be if I'd seen it recently, but here are some of the reasons:

1. It glorifies Onanism.

2. It glorifies fornication.

3. It misrepresents people who have wholesome family values as idiots.

4. It misrepresents people who have wholesome family values as racists.

5. It says the world is bad if it is a good world that has morality.

6. It says the world is good if it is an evil world that has no morality.

darwin a 'genius', ...way to worship your god again in grand idolatry, darwinists. [[roll]]

I wonder if they are gonna put signs around his 'heritage home' celebrating his/their incest heritage, showing all the places he banged his cousin in his incest/heritage home? Oh wait, that would be bad for PR and when something is bad for PR darwinists just sweep it under the rug and pretend it doesn't exist...so guess they won't be doing that.

Science is observable, testable, and repeatable.

On the other hand, your evolution mythology is none of the above. yuk yuk.

By the way, America was founded by Bible-believing Christians called Puritans who accepted the Bible and who rejected your evolution mythology. So if you don't like Bible-believing Christians, then logically you should get the heck out of America right now, and take all of your darwinist ilk with you

I'm not an expert on the minutiae of how exactly Noah built his ark...but I'm not sure what you keep harping on about. You seem to be implying that Noah didn't use steel or support plates or bolts. How do you know those things?

Fundamentalism is a sect from the early 1900's that has nothing whatsoever to do with anything that I stand for. I believe and act in accordance with how godly people have always believed and acted since the dawn of mankind, starting with Adam. My form of godliness predates "Fundamentalism" by several thousands of years. The fact that you and other ignorant darwinists nevertheless associate me with a relatively new sect from the 1900's displays your profound ignorance of God.

My knowledge comes from God. Any so-called 'knowledge' that contradicts God's Word is false & illegitimate knowledge.