www.unz.com

Bill P #fundie unz.com

"I’d again adapt one of Steve’s useful neologisms — Low-Information people believe Obama is a Muslim, and there are a whole lot of Low Information Muslims. There is nothing to indicate Obama was ever a Muslim, at all. The best the allegers can come up with is left-wing boilerplate about “siding with Muslims if typical White bigots attack them”, etc."

In this case, I’d say that what you call “low-information people” have better instincts than you have information.

Islam, like Judaism, is heritable. If a Jewish woman’s child is a Jew, then the child of a Muslim man is a Muslim.

Why is it that everybody called Bobby Fischer a Jew despite his protests that he was not? Because his mother was Jewish. We accept that a Jew can be born a Jew but a Muslim cannot be born a Muslim? Ridiculous. Muslims are pretty specific about this. When taking female captives (only non-Muslims can be enslaved), a Muslim man is instructed not to have sex with them until they have had their period to be sure that he does not raise a heathen child as his own.

According to Muslims, one cannot unbecome a Muslim. One is a Muslim for life. If there is any dispute about this, it is settled with a trial for apostasy. If found guilty, the accused is to be put to death. Better dead than un-Muslimed, you see.

So Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim. To Muslims, there is no question about this. ISIS thinks he is an apostate and openly says so (I suspect this is why Obama honestly doesn’t like them), but a lot of other Muslims probably want to give him the benefit of the doubt, because, well, apostate is kind a harsh label because of that death penalty thing.

Daniel Pipes lays all doubt to rest.

The American idea that people choose their faith some time in early adulthood and can then exchange it at will throughout life is not the global norm. It isn’t even entirely the norm in the US. It’s a kind of mass delusion, really. Americans have this idea that their beliefs and customs came entirely from their own choices and free will, which is impossible and an absurd idea. But it’s a part of our own “religion,” so to speak. So when we argue about whether or not Obama is Muslim, it only displays our own curious creed as the global aberration that it is.

Bill P #sexist unz.com

Have any of these fools thought of the political implications of telling parents that their daughters have to serve in combat? It’s hard enough for parents to stomach their sons going to war, but at least they tend to think the young man might have a fighting chance.

Women in their prime are about comparable in terms of physical ability to 14yo boys. Why not lower the age of military service to 14? What’s the difference, morally speaking? To me, one of the creepiest scenes from WWII video footage was of Hitler patting adolescent boys on the head before sending them out to die in a lost cause. Listen to the last boy. He’s a little kid. If I ever found myself sympathizing with Nazis, all I’d have to do to cure the sentiment would be to watch that clip and I’d be ready to string them up without compunction. Does Obama want to be shown sending women off to combat? Does Ash Carter?

These people are sick in the head. Women and children should only have to fight as a last resort, and our current situation is anything but that.

Bill P #fundie unz.com

"While there is no medical evidence that racism is toxic to those who express it — after all, generations of wealthy slave owners survived quite nicely — the combination of downward mobility and racial resentment may be a potent invitation to the kind of despair that leads to suicide in one form or another, whether by gunshots or drugs. You can’t break a glass ceiling if you’re standing on ice."

That last sentence sounds like a threat, Mrs. Ehrenreich. The insinuation that racial resentment is “toxic” is the worst kind of insult to the most maligned ethno-social class in the US today: the working class white.

Why is it that when blacks are encouraged to nurse a sense of racial grievance and entitlement their lifespan increases, while whites who are denounced for any such sentiment die earlier? Is it because what you call “racism” is toxic? No, I don’t think so. Ethnic cohesion and group identity is obviously healthy. Deny it to people, and they become weaker and sicker.

But here you are giving people poison pills and calling it a cure. It’s time we started calling it as it is: you have blood on your hands, woman. You are a “willing executioner.” And there’s plenty more where that came from.

Bill P #fundie unz.com

It is pretty pathetic. And total bullshit. Charlie Hebdo jokes about death in such a way to demonstrate that its staff has next to no respect for human life. Does one “celebrate life” by drawing cartoons making sport of innocent people’s death?

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

I’d stop short of saying the cartoonists deserved to be gunned down by Muslim fanatics, but I have infinitely more sympathy for the cops who lost their lives protecting the degenerates than for the targets themselves.

BTW, if one really wants to be brave as a cartoonist in the US, try drawing a cartoon ridiculing Martin Luther King Jr. I don’t even know whether there’s an equivalent off-limits religious figure in France. In the US, MLK is Jesus, Muhammed and all the Christian saints and Hebrew prophets put together. It’s our bona-fide state religion, and I’ve never heard a public figure ever speak of him in anything but the most reverent tones.

@TheLatestInDecay #racist unz.com

Black male sexual attractiveness to white women — to the degree that it exists at all, which is real though statistically minimal — is entirely a function of a century of relentless pimping by the Jewish media. So, Severn, you’re just in someone else’s stable. The statistics of battering and murder of white girlfriends and wives by their black partners does, however, confirm the truth of your claim that you represent the “ultimate” sensual experience. So there’s that.

The Priss Factory #racist unz.com

If anything, the possibility that there are many smart blacks should be all the more reason why whites should keep black Africans out of the West.
It’s like the apes became all the more threatening when a smart one appeared among them in CONQUEST OF THE PLANET OF THE APES. These smart Igbos are gonna come to the West, gain elite power, and lead the dumb negroes against whites. Also, these igbo negro men will use white wombs to create a race of mulattoes to rule over whites and blacks. Hell with mulattos hatched by race traitor scum bitches.
It will mean more blacks will enter elite institutions of the West, take more white women, and take more powerful positions in all walks of society and then use their power to steer the West toward more pro-African positions. Let Africa be pro-Africa and let blacks be pro-black.

West and whites should be pro-west and pro-white, and this means seeing the black race as the #1 enemy of the white race. A race is sound only when it holds onto its homeland and when the women of the race respect their own men and feel it is an honor to use their wombs to produce children of her own race.
But with all these Negroes in the West, we got jungle fever and white women using wombs to produce disgusting mulatto obama-babies. We have white women who feel proud to have mulatto babies growing in their bellies while black men put their hands on the belly. What kind of white male with any pride could tolerate such foulness?

We have white boys beaten up by black kids in schools. We have white guys turned into disgusting cuckolds and wussy-ass maggots. White guys are gonna become to the Negro what yellow guys have become to non-yellows in America. Do white guys wanna be second-rate males in their own homeland?

If this negro writer is right and there are plenty of smart negroes, it is all the worse for the white race that needs to wake up to the threat posed by ghastly negroes.

Bill P #fundie unz.com

Christianity definitely created what we understand as liberalism today, which is really radical egalitarianism (not always very liberal in practice).

However, it was a Jewish convert named Saul who laid the foundation:

There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

Our contemporary liberalism started with a repudiation of Classical Judaism, which as a highly stratified, racially exclusive religion could not be liberal by Western standards. Nor can modern Judaism or Islam, both of which reject Paul’s proclamation that we are all equal under God. But it took over a thousand years of institutional Christianity before the idea mutated into its current form.

My guess is that as long as the church had a great deal of authority over people’s lives, it was a useful concept for promoting social harmony and a sense of mutual obligation among the different classes (e.g. aristocrats were supposed to acknowledge that God did not favor them over social inferiors), as well as a check on secular power vis a vis the church. However, when the church’s power began to recede and break up as it lost its monopoly over knowledge, this central tenet of Christianity took on a life of its own – it came unmoored from the rock of faith so to speak – and became a tool in the hands of secular factions challenging the prevailing authority.

Jews could not develop a Western-style liberal society as long as they lived under rabbinic authority, so it was only when egalitarian Westerners freed them from that authority (a sort of ecclesiastic law for Jews) and granted them citizenship that they were able to do so.

And no, the liberalism wasn’t the Protestants’ fault. Napoleon was more influential than anyone else in spreading the new faith. I think the peculiar Yankee and English form of radical egalitarianism was a competition with the French; an attempt to show that they were just as righteous as the French – more so even – and could prove it. As an example of the ferocity of this competition, in the beginning of the American Republic the Francophile and Anglophile factions waged what amounted to a low-intensity war. So many killed each other in duels that the officer corps was depleted.

Today all egalitarian political systems, including our own as well as Communist China’s, are based on this originally Christian idea of human equality. We have been in a crusade that has been on the march for over 200 years. It is very much a religious movement, and so all-encompassing that it rarely even occurs to people to question their faith in the beliefs it is built upon. Only in the last few decades, and ever so carefully, have a few begun to do so openly.

Bill P #fundie unz.com

This “bodies” term is liberal dog-whistling for “raped.”

It comes straight from women’s studies jargon, which may be the ugliest form of English yet invented. Lesbians (I hesitate to use the appropriate term here) are not only aesthetically challenged when it comes to personal appearance, but language as well.

One of these days, conservatives are going to have to acknowledge that so-called “gender equality” is anathema to even the pretense of civilized society.

Bill P #fundie unz.com

Feminism is as old as the hills, and Jews didn’t invent it. Sexual tension is part of the biological mechanism of sexual reproduction and has been observed even in fruit flies. It’s a mechanism for promoting stability and fitness of the species. That said, yeah, there was a KGB push to promote feminism in the West during the Cold War. That’s how Betty Friedan got her first writing job. She was tasked with pushing feminism for the CPUSA as early as 1947 if I recall correctly. Somehow that led her into more lucrative positions when she probably switched sides and started pushing it for the CIA, which also employed Gloria Steinem BTW.

For those who think feminism is new, ask yourselves why ancient patriarchs felt compelled to write male authority into law thousands of years ago. Obviously, it was an issue long before the Enlightenment and other recent follies. Read the classics and you’ll see it was as much of a problem then as it is now.

Anatoly Karlin #fundie unz.com

Scott carefully steers away from the obvious (i.e. HBD) explanation – i.e. that something just prevents East Asians from climbing to the top, just like it’s an unlikely there were be non-West African descdended winners of sprinting events anytime soon. It’s more surprising that the Lord of HBD does likewise. ;)

The Japanese and South Korean teams are nothing to write home about either. The US, a country that at least until recently had the reputation of being unintered in football, and which excels in dozens of other major sports, still manages to have a better team than any of them. (Note that in football, population size pretty much ceases to have an effect once you go past 20mn or so: The Portuguese and Dutch teams have almost always been world class, and even 2mn strong Croatia traditionally makes a very strong, competent showing).

Football requires a combination of speed, disciplined teamwork, and artistry. Africans, Germanics, and Latins all consistently do well on it. East Asian teams tend to have the second factor down, the Japanese do at any rate, but the first and probably the third will always be a stumbling block for them.

Bill P #racist unz.com

Football requires a combination of speed, disciplined teamwork, and artistry. Africans, Germanics, and Latins all consistently do well on it. East Asian teams tend to have the second factor down, the Japanese do at any rate, but the first and probably the third will always be a stumbling block for them.

East Asians – the Japanese being the exception to the rule – do not excel at disciplined teamwork. I don’t know why Westerners assume that this is their strength, because there is no compelling evidence of it on the ground in China. Or the Koreas for that matter. As for the Japanese, I don’t think it comes as naturally to them as it does to Germans, but they make up for it in effort and a very strict shame-based social code of conduct.

East Asians are extraordinarily prone to cheating each other, pulling rank, abusing power, ignoring rule of law, etc.

Africans, for their part, couldn’t hope to compete without European coaches. And even then it’s only their physical talent that makes them somewhat competitive.

Bill P #racist unz.com

Antiracism (i.e. Equalism/Blank Slatism) is only one of many US religions. It was dominant only during Reconstruction and the latter part of the 20th century. It’s already losing steam again. It most recently reached its intellectual/cultural peak in the 1970s, and its power peak in the 90s. Since then it’s been hanging on through increasingly repressive measures.

Faced with a credible challenge, it will crumble. This will probably happen when the system built on Equalist principles fails spectacularly, and that should occur pretty soon. We already had a taste of it with the subprime mortgage bubble and subsequent collapse. Whatever comes next will be a bigger fiasco. Maybe it will be some dramatic upheaval in our cities when the boomers begin to retire and entitlements no longer become feasible, and the antiracists themselves bring about the reversal of the urban revitalization that’s been ongoing since the mid 90s. The recent events in New York over the Eric Garner incident demonstrate that cities are currently resting on a pretty fragile foundation. One major riot combined with a demoralized police force could set off a chain of events leading to the collapse of the progressive power base.

Bill P #fundie unz.com

I sometimes wonder whether anti-fascism isn’t driven by some sexual pressure, i.e. the tikkun olam fags are really upset that they aren’t getting a piece of the action, so they agitate as though their balls are on fire.

Healthy women seem to have a thing for militant guys, and that must be extremely frustrating for the Dilberts out there, so they come up with all sorts of reasons why these guys should be condemned eternally for their damned sexiness.

I mean, shouldn’t academic weenies have a shot at these hot specimens from northern Europe instead of being stuck in sterile institutions with clumsy female nerds who have the sex appeal of lab monkeys?

This is why Morris Dees is such a hero to these types. Through shameless self-promotion and deceptive advertising the man achieved alpha male status despite taking on a cause associated with the dregs of manhood. Really, a man to look up to, and one whose achievements every weaselly liar should strive to emulate.

Oh, America, how proud I am of what you have wrought: the Clintonian scumbag with a girl under the table on her knees, selling out his own folk. A truly glorious specimen of homo nematodensis.

Bill P #fundie unz.com

This entire concept of gay marriage is ridiculous. It has never existed, and it never will. It’s a hoax foisted on the entire American people, and to what end? So that homosexuals can pay each other alimony?

Gays have already voted with their better sense and overwhelmingly declined civil marriage where it is available to them. Look at the stats from gay marriage states: either gays are a far, far lower fraction of our population than they claim, or they are generally uninterested in marriage, except perhaps as a means to delegitimize and wreck real marriage (I lost my sympathy for gay rights when it became nothing more than a way to actively punish sexually normal people).

American morality has become a running joke the world over. Where we used to be considered a truly righteous people, we are now seen as a bunch of fags to the masses of Eurasia and Africa. It’s totally contemptible, and it’s amazing how quickly this happened.

I could give a damn about being condemned by liberals for saying so; they are the ones who will have to defend themselves, just like Charlie Hebdo’s anally-fixated cartoonists.

Good luck with that!

Bill P #racist unz.com

Not true, Enrique. White males were the first group to see slower job growth and lower labor force participation in the early 1980s, right at the beginning of the shift away from an egalitarian society. This is because affirmative action started to be implemented in a meaningful way right at that time.

Pushing women into the workplace was also a result of affirmative action, and that had a negative effect on marital stability for non-elite whites. Affirmative action has been a net negative for whites, and liberals often gloat over our reduced status, saying things like “white men are enraged because they are no longer ‘privileged’” (as though the white working class ever was).

Affirmative action has had real, negative effects on non-elite white males, and that was by design. You may deny this, but it is universally unpopular with these non-elite whites. Is this because they are all stupid, ignorant, inbred rednecks as the anti-racist left would have us believe? Are they suffering from mass delusion? Were they fooled by aliens? Or the Republicans (who simply exploited white resentment of Democrats who sold them out)? No, they aren’t really that stupid. They know that affirmative action is against their interests.

Sure, elite whites supported it from the beginning. Republicans wanted women in the workforce during the Eisenhower administration. Democrats fought that hard for a while, and women mainly voted Republican until the 1970s (today’s gender gap is a reversal from those times). Saturating the labor market has always been capitalists’ goal, and women and minorities were seen as convenient tools for that.

Sure, it sucks for minorities that white men opposed immigration and didn’t want their jobs opened to others circa 1960, but they were looking after their and their families’ interests, and they comprised about 90% of the population. Maybe you think that’s evil. I think it’s pragmatic, just as Cesar Chavez thought it was pragmatic to keep immigrants from taking farm workers’ jobs in California back in the day.

And frankly speaking, blacks as a group are incapable of creating the kind of society that can support the industry and lifestyle whites built in the US, and that was and continues to be a widely known (although seldom admitted) fact. Contemporary Detroit is a sad testament to this inadequacy. So white workers felt that they deserved to share in the wealth created by a white society without the threat of replacement by cheaper labor, and rightly so. Is it fair that blacks should benefit from the society that made white industry possible while the whites who formed its bedrock are cast aside and forced to pay the bills for the problems created by black failure to conform to it? Maybe you think so, but for the white working class it was an enormous betrayal, yet a triumph for thieving elites. Remember: white industry was stifled in the slave society of the American South, and that’s what motivated most people to vote for Abe Lincoln — not Harriet Beecher Stowe and her quaint little fantasy.

As long as the white majority was steadily accumulating wealth this situation could be tolerated, but all that has changed, so white priorities will change as well. It’s as sure as the sun setting in the west. Maybe there’s nothing we can do about it, and we’re destined to live a lifestyle approximating that in Jalisco or – heaven forbid – Port au Prince, but that isn’t what we want, and we have every right to try to prevent it.

Bill P #racist unz.com

[Soros has] been investing in real estate funds. There’s a push to drive whites back into cities where they can be charged exorbitant rent by giant corporate property owners. Getting blacks to riot in the cities shoved whites out 40 years ago, so he probably figures getting blacks to riot in the burbs will drive them back in. In concert with the riots, smaller cities and suburbs are being sued for “disparate impact” more than ever, to force them to affirmatively seek black section 8 renters.

George Soros has been involved with this disparate impact issue, especially in trying to keep SCOTUS from ruling against these federal lawsuits. There could be a lot of money in forcing whites to move back into cities where rents and housing are far more expensive these days.

Bill P #fundie unz.com

But this isn’t the issue. I’ve been writing about left creationism for years, and arguing that Christian creationism is less damaging because despite its non-scientific origins at least it’s largely based on fundamental truths that have been vindicated by science.

For example, is it better to teach one’s children that sodomy is prohibited by God, or that it’s natural and good stuff “because gay penguins”?

I’m not a Creationist, but if I had to choose between left theology and Christian theology for my kids, I’d go for the latter every time. I’m pretty sure most people feel the same way, which is why so many non-believers still haul their kids into church every Sunday.

Even so, it’s a losing battle. Christianity was as “true” as anything in its time, but it’s been superseded by its bastard progressive faith. We really need a new religion very badly.

Bill P #fundie unz.com

War Nerd goes on about how important the CNN war is here, citing videos that may discourage recruits. I’ve seen videos put out by YPG of women fighting in Kobani who can’t even handle a kalashnikov’s recoil. I’ve seen pictures of smiling ISIS jihadis holding the severed heads of young female YPG recruits.

In our backward world, are we somehow supposed to see the side that sends farm girls to die in urban combat to gain western sympathy as morally superior? When PPK operatives hide out in Turkish mountains while hapless girls die for them are we supposed to herald this as progress?

I don’t think the Croats and YPG are remotely comparable. There’s a reason the Peshmerga sent precious few fighters to Kobani. It would be a waste of resources, and the destruction of a YPG force is not exactly a calamity from their point of view. For the Turks, this is the best of all worlds. Let YPG discredit itself and the cause of Kurdish independence by sacrificing Kurds’ daughters on the front lines while the USAF destroys ISIS armor, neutralizing any future threat to the southern border.

As an American, I have to take the Turks’ side here. YPG’s cynical use of western feminism in this “CNN war,” which war nerd seems to think is a good idea, may not rise to the level of ISIS mass murder, but it’s bad enough that it would be for the best if both ISIS and YPG fought each other to exhaustion. Evidently, American officers feel the same way; if they know that some of the supplies they dropped ended up in ISIS hands they must surely be aware that some of the bombs they’ve dropped have hit YPG positions.

Bill P #fundie unz.com

I know PKK (a designated terrorist organization) has long been fielding women, much like MEK (also terrorist), but what gets me is the recent adulation coming from our press over this abhorrent practice of using girls who can hardly fight as cannon fodder.

Now, they seem to have picked up on the dumb feminist contingent stateside and are making even more of a spectacle out of these girls from mountain villages. If these are our most important “allies” in the region, and unfortunately it looks as though they are, we’ve already lost this battle.

Bill P #sexist unz.com

"Seriously, no. Feminism is about equal rights and opportunities for women. It has nothing to do with the battle of the sexes or ideas of special female superiority."

Yes, feminism is about gender equality, which does not exist, never has, and never will as long as we remain human. That’s why it’s so screwed up and unnatural, and causes far more problems than it solves.

We can objectively prove that this equality does not and cannot exist, yet people believe in it nonetheless and consider themselves rational. Often, it is the same people who scoff at the notion of a higher power, even though they can’t prove that there is no God.

Bill P #racist #sexist unz.com

And East Asian women are morphologically less distinct from men than Europeans. Also, it appears that they are cognitively more masculine than NW European women (check US math test scores by race — white males test significantly closer to Asian males than white females to Asian females).

Northern European gender equality is a myth supported by the great indulgence shown to Nordic women. Feminine weakness and foibles are tolerated in Scandinavia to a degree that would seem absurd to Asians or Africans. Scandinavian women’s participation at the highest levels is possible because of the extreme deference shown to women in these countries, which would be unthinkable in the rest of the world. I’d argue that this demonstrates higher levels of sexual dimorphism: if women were really treated “equally” then they would be marginalized as they are in most of the world.

Bill P #fundie unz.com

One ignored part of the story is that Houllebecq is pointing out in so many words that, having been reduced to relying on our women to save our civilization, we have already lost. He explicitly states in his Paris Review article that feminism is bound to lose, and seems to hint that the feminization of European nationalism is a sad testament to its impotence and inevitable failure. He actually equates it to the black Madonna. The symbolism is impossible to ignore.

As far as I can tell, the overriding lesson is that feminism has to be stamped out for us to survive. Can we do that? Probably not. Hence Muslims win.

Houllebecq says he can “make arrangements:”

"That’s why I don’t feel that I’m writing out of fear. I feel, rather, that we can make arrangements. The feminists will not be able to, if we’re being completely honest. But I and lots of other people will."

Yes, if we’re being completely honest, I could make arrangements too. Better Sharia than feminist hell on earth.

Bill P #fundie unz.com

The problem with MRA is that it’s the other side of the feminist coin. Guys like Warren Farrell and Paul Elam believe fervently in gender equality, even though it never has and never will exist, but they differ from feminists in the details.

I compare it to Trotskyites vs. Stalinists.

The solution isn’t to double down on gender equality, but to reject the concept altogether. I advocate replacing the word “equality” with “balance.” A society in which there is a balance between the masculine and feminine elements is a happy, healthy society. Same goes for a family.

Obviously, one won’t find balance in the individual, but that’s why nature created us man and woman in the first place — so we wouldn’t be merely a mass of individuals but complementary parts of the species.

This gender equality nonsense is the natural consequence of centuries of progressive individualism, which results in a bland, atomized society in which there are no natural divisions or communities. It turns out that Enlightenment thinking logically progresses to this kind of dystopia, so MRAs who refuse to abandon it will lead us to exactly the same place the feminists would.

Jefferson #racist unz.com

The irony that the left wing media has an extreme hatred of the Triracial George Zimmerman, when their goal is for one day the vast majority of Americans be Triracial just like George Zimmerman.

George Zimmerman is the product of racial miscegenation, so the left wing elites in the media should be celebrating him not condemning him. They should be happy that the German American father chose a Vibrantly Diverse Peruvian woman for marriage and not a Stale Pale Female.

Fisk Ellington Rutledge III #racist unz.com

Latins, legal or illegal, have no business in the United States. The story of the United States as a success story is the story of White people.

Everywhere Latins settle in the U.S. turns into a third-world hellhole rife with crime, corruption and just general bad behavior. Whatever field of work becomes dominated by Latins is characterized by slow, shoddy workmanship.

Latins are also more grist for the racist affirmative-action mill and every government handout available. They are foot soldiers for Leftist cowards and traitors.

There is no upside to immigration, legal or illegal, from Latin America. Their very presence in this country erodes everything that made the U.S. a great place to live.

It was bad enough when the only third-world savages we had were Blacks. Now the new third-world savages, mostly Latins, are the primary reason that half the country doesn’t read and is obese and fails in school. There is no cure for these ills except summary deportation of all nonWhites.

Deportation of nonWhites is going to happen sooner or later. That is just a fact, and the sooner the better. We can’t live in the midst of our enemies, and we deserve the country that Whites built.

Peter Frost #racist unz.com

Through their high capacity for affective empathy and empathic guilt, these Northwest Europeans had an edge in adapting to later cultural environments that would be structured not by kinship but by other ways of organizing social relations: the State, ideology, and the market economy.

This has been one path that leads to advanced societies, but it is not the only one. East Asian societies have pursued a similar path of cultural evolution while having relatively low levels of affective empathy and empathic guilt. They seem to have done so by relying more on external means of behavior control (shaming, family discipline, community surveillance) and by building on cognitive empathy through learned notions of moral duty.

Meanwhile, Northwest European societies have had their capacity for empathy pushed to the limit, as seen in the commonly heard term “aid fatigue.” And there is no easy way to turn it off. The only real way is to convince oneself that the object of empathy is morally worthless.

Was it all an evolutionary mistake? Time will tell.

pizza with hot pepper #racist unz.com

“The Negro is a phobogenic object.”

But it would be wrong to blame the media for this perception of blacks.

For most of American history, blacks were depicted as either docile Negroes(overly idealized) or as funny caricatures munching on watermelons. Neither was threatening. Sure, there were stuff like Birth of a Nation, but they were the exceptions, especially as Hollywood was ruled by yanomanos. Black characters are mostly kindly and likable in Gone with the Wind. There was then noble negro bellowing ‘ole man river’ in Showboat. And there were plenty of funny black stereotypes that presented blacks as childlike clowns–like Harpo in Marx Brothers though with less wit.

Also, after Jack Johnson scared white folks half to death, the media and sports industry went out of their way to build up the image of the dignified negro. Joe Louis the brown bomber was coached to be ‘gentle’. You’d think he didn’t mean to knock them all them white boys. He just stuck out his fist but white boys bumped into them, and he didn’t know what to do but say, “dang I is sorry”.
And there was the Jackie Robinson cult.

Look at most movies about crime in the 1970s–height of black mayhem in urban areas–, and Hollywood made most of the thugs out to be white. If you go by DEATH WISH, NY was mostly terrorized by white trash and swarthy looking ethnics. In DEATH WISH III, urban thugs are led by some multi-color-haired ‘Aryan’ type.
Rocky movies had people fantasize that Rocky Marciano was back and whupping all the Negroes.

If anything, Western media went out of its way to tone down the black physical threat.
But the image-of-black-physical-threat lingered because of a little thing called REALITY.

I personally grew up watching all those PBS docs about civil rights and about how race is just a ‘myth’. I took all those classes where the teacher and textbooks told us of evils of ‘racism’ and blah blah blah. But reality was something I had to reckon with(even against my will as I’d really and truly come to believe in all the hogwash fed to me in school and on PBS). Non-blacks flee from black areas because blacks are rowdier, more aggressive, more out-of-control, stronger, tougher, and nastier. It’s the truth.

I–and many honest people, including liberals–think this way because I’d rather be honest with reality than cowardly with PC.

If anything, the media have gone out of its way to cover up stories of black crime, thuggery, rape, and mayhem— all the while distorting, spinning, and sensationalizing stories where blacks are supposedly the ‘victims’. When twenty plus blacks raped a 11 yr Mexican girl in Texas, the media said ‘Texans’ did it.
Whatever one thinks of Zimmerman, he was a pudgy mestizo who got whupped by a much taller and bigger black kid, but the media put forth a narrative of an angelic black ‘child armed with only a bag of skittles’ shot down by a towering ‘white southern male’.
(Sometimes, I wonder if white libs peddle such silly notions–harking back to Civil Rights days–because it makes them feel powerful. As white libs are helpless to do anything about real black violence and crime, spinning such narratives creates the illusion that they are still powerful whites with the decency to care and weep about helpless black children who are still being victimized by white ‘racism’. Similarly, the likes of John McCain and John Bolton prefer to believe that they are strong powerful white knight warriors working tirelessly to protect helpless yanomanos from all-powerful Palestinians, Iranians, Syrians, and Russians. If you’re powerless before something, spin the narrative so as to make believe you have power over it and are working to protect the poor thing from dangers–even though what you’re really doing is serving as its running dog.)

If black bodies are ‘phobogenic’, it’s not because but in spite of the media and mass education. The media, education, and government have been telling us forever that we are all equal, but in the streets and public places, it’s obvious as day that bigger/stronger Negroes do indeed cause lots of mayhem.

The power of media is considerable but it’s not total. Entertainment has given us lots of movies about invincible Asian kung fu masters, but most people don’t fear Asians because in the real world, they know that most Asians are scrawny and a physical threat to no one.
I mean who finds Asian bodies ‘phobogenic’?

pizza with hot pepper #racist unz.com

NY and SF uses ‘racist’ policies but then hides their ‘racism’ by being so shrill about the ‘racism’ in places like Sanford and Ferguson.

It’s rather like the West’s attitude toward Russia. With the rise of PC, super-rich oligarchal rule, speech codes, climate of fear(silence that led to Rotherham scandal), crackdown on dissidents(ask Richwine, Stephanie Grace, all the UK residents arrested for comments on Twitter, etc), and etc, it should be obvious that the West is now a globalist oligarchy dominated by Yanomanos and homos.
Notice that EVERY American politician grovels before TOUCANPAC if they wanna be elected.
Given the increasing illberalism of the so-called ‘liberal democratic west’, how can the elites perpetuate the illusion that liberal democracy is alive, healthy, and still going strong?

Well, there is Russia-bashing as a means to prop up the myth that the West is all about ‘liberal democracy’ AS OPPOSED TO Russia, which is supposedly the New Nazi nation.

With the rise of Political Correctness, Yanomano supremacism, the coercive cult of ‘diversity’ crammed down the throats of whites, the nasty homo agenda pushed up the butt of the entire nation, speech codes, and blacklisting-firing-and-shunning of any real dissident voices, the West hardly stand for liberal democracy anymore, and of course, the Yanomano elites know this.

So, in order to cover up the repressive nature of Yanomano-controlled West, we’ve been fed the false dichotomy of the Free West vs autocratic Russia and China. True, China is a nasty repressive nation, and Russia, though nominally a democracy, is corrupt and autocratic in many ways.
BUT the West today, with its PC and Yanomano-supremacism where all politicians grovel before TOUCANPAC, is in no position to preach to anyone about liberal democratic values.

Thus, the only way the Yanomano elites in the West can fool us that we are living in a ‘liberal democracy’ is to create a us-vs-them situation whereby we are supposedly so free and sane(like in supporting ‘gay marriage’ and ruining businesses that won’t bake ‘gay wedding’ cakes)whereas Russians are so enslaved and deranged because they won’t allow homos to march down Red Square, the hallowed ground where soldiers march every year to commemorate the great sacrifices in the Great Patriotic War that claimed over 20 million Russian souls. But in truth, most Russians feel far more empowered under patriotic Putin whereas most whites feel totally browbeaten and castrated under the rule of Yanomano neo-kings and homo neo-queens.

Ferguson and Russia— one and the same in the devious minds of the Western elites

bert #racist unz.com

Pretty much.

Asians have long been a thorn in the Jewish intelligentsia’s side because of their failure to bow down to modern American racial flagellation.

Some years ago there were violent attacks on elderly Chinese in the Bay Area by blacks. The typical cohort of aging college professors tried to get them to bow down and admit that they’re to blame for the black’s lack of opportunity (because black failure is everyone else’s fault). Instead the Chinese reacted quite violently, organizing neighborhood watches, encouraging police sweeps of black neighborhoods, and buying guns for Asian store owners. All of a sudden, poof, black crime went away.

Methinks that didn’t win them too many friends among the usual suspects.

Jefferson #racist unz.com

In San Francisco and Oakland, Blacks thugs like to target Asians who have an electronic device in their hands like an iPod or an iPhone. They also like to target Asian FOB senior citizens who speak little to no English.

I used to feel sorry for them but now not so much because the majority of Asian Americans who are victims of African American thuggery will still end up voting Democrat.

Don’t take this personally, because I also apply mentality this to White liberals who are victims of African American thuggery. I do not feel sorry for them either.

pizza with hot pepper #racist unz.com

One of the big realities of American life is black-on-non-black crime, violence, and rape.

But because the media and academia are controlled by Liberals, young NON-BLACKS have been brainwashed with the cult of the Magic Negro. It’s PC to make white girls fear and hate white males but un-PC to alert white girls to the danger of black crime.

Even Paglia won’t touch this racial angle. Though men of all races are capable of violence and rape, it is a bigger problem with black males. Every year, there are 10,000s of black-on-white rape but virtually no white-on-black rape.

But the problem may be bigger than white female naivete. According to Paglia, the problem exists because white girls have been coddled in protective surroundings.
This may be true with some.

But there are white girls who hook up with dangerous black men because they watch sports, listen to pop music, and watch porn and become excited and turned on by the thrill of the mighty mandingo stud. So, even though they know the danger, the lust-thrill element is too much for them to resist.

It’s like kids know that it’s dangerous to do tricks with skateboards but they just can’t resist the thrill.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFXxmwHUpis

pizza with hot pepper #racist unz.com

About Eskimos, dammit.

You see, it makes no sense to talk about the powerless since they have no power over us. Jews are powerless, so why talk about them? It’d be as pointless as bitching about the Nepalese or Madagascarians.

We should focus our attention on those who control our politicians. Those who groomed and made Obama. Who are over-represented in the supreme court. Who’ve been pushing open borders. Who’ve had people like Jason Richwine fired. Who triggered wars in the Middle East and Ukraine. Who’ve purged all the ‘Arabists’. Who’ve pulled strings to force Hungary to ban a conference about the survival of white people.

We need to focus our attention on the power.
When wasps ruled, the eskimos concentrated their vitriol on the wasps. They didn’t waste their energies on Bulgarian-Americans.

To be sure, I’m beginning to suspect that it’s really the yanomamos who really control the power in the US. I’m always open to revising the truth if need be. Maybe yanopac is more powerful than Icepac.

Scott Siskind #racist unz.com

Karl,

The only way to encourage eugenic breeding for the lower races is not to give everyone money so that they can live comfortably, but to give such incentives in exchange for sterilization. It seems to me the most humane action we can, and should, take so that in some number of generations lower ability races can reach the white mean in things like IQ, ability, conscientiousness etc. As Greg Cochran said, eugenics is not only possible, but trivial. I would like to further add that eugenics isnot only all that, but it is necessary and our moral prerogative. There is nothing “racist” or “classist” about it, this is just common sense.

pizza with hot pepper #racist unz.com

While blacks do have a genetic problem with civilization, their chances in the social order can be improved if they drummed through a ‘fascist’ system. If government is so bad for blacks, why have blacks done better in the military than in other institutions? Order and discipline.

So, what should really be offered to blacks is the ‘fascist path to freedom’. Paradoxical but true.

pizza with hot pepper #racist unz.com

Just look at the state of UK today. You still have elites who are well-mannered, well-read, and well-spoken, but the main cultural interest now revolves around convulsion, especially in relation to the Negro. Andrew Sullivan the homo may find meaning in books and surely finds life easy with the modern conveniences(created by so many white scientists and inventors), but where does he find the greatest pleasure in life? By having some muscled big-donged Negro pump him in the ass. That pretty much sums up the essence of what the British elites stand for nowadays.

Today, Eskimos control much of the convenience industry–especially in high tech–and the conversion industry(academia, media, publishing, etc). Control of areas like Silicon valley and finance technology gives Eskimos tremendous amount of money. And with that money, they’ve bought up all the media and fund much of the academia. And they use their control over conversion-spheres to promote ‘white guilt’ as the main moral-spiritual ideology of the age.
And as Eskimos own much of sports, media, TV, music, and porn, they work in cahoots with Negroes to push the Negro dope or Negrope on white junkies who are totally addicted to orgasmic convulsions from sports, rap music, porn, and even watching one’s own wives be humped by Negroes.

pizza with hot pepper #conspiracy unz.com

maybe in some sense, blacks could take pride in not having been able to create civilization.
To create civilization, the slavish genes have to outnumber the savage genes. It’s like dogs are easier to control than wolves. And yet, wolves are freer, wilder, and more robust. Dogs are more useful but they take orders and are wussy creatures.

The races that created civilization tended to be more slavish. Maybe nature made them more slavish, and then, civilizational factors compounded the slavishness by weeding out the savage genes. So, as a group, they could achieve more but this happened at the cost of individual savage gene that was more robust, rambunctious, colorful, exuberant, and etc.
It’s like Chinese and Japanese built high civilizations, but they are colorless, can’t sing, can’t dance, are mostly skin-and-bones, tend to be timid and sheepish, and look like dickless space aliens at the end of CLOSE ENCOUNTERS. It’s like the natives of Mexico may have built Tiachuchatlan(sic) but they are a timid, sheepish, and colorless bunch. For them to be useful for building civilization, they had to be more slavish than savage.
Now compare the wolfish Mongols with the doggish Chinese. Mongols, by Asian standards, are big and robust and have barbarian souls. They don’t like to take too much shit. They built less civilization but there’ something vital about them–and Mongol sumo guys bounce Japanese guys like ping pong balls.

Because Negroes failed to develop civilization, they came to be subjugated by other races. And they became slaves in Arabia and the New World. But in terms of their nature, blacks are least fit to be slaves. They have the savage gene than slavish gene. From a social viewpoint, the savage gene is problematic as too many Negroes be running wild and be acting like lunatics. But many people also find it vibrant, exciting, manly, sexy, badass, and etc. Look at the worldwide success of rap music. No one watches Chinese sports, but many millions of Chinese love to watch NBA where big ass Negroes dunk the balls while being cheered on by blonde women cheerleaders who now salivate over having sex with big muscular Negroes who be seen as the superior males.
Among all the arts, music is the most spontaneous and powerful, and blacks have been, pound for pound, the most dominant force in pop music in the 20th century with their contribution to or invention of blues, jazz, rock n roll, soul, reggae, rap, and etc. Such music arose from the savage genes, and it turns a lot of people on. No one listens to the music-of-slavish-genes of the Mexicans or Chinese.

So, in some ways, blacks may take pride in not having built the pyramids and the great wall. They were too strong, too badass, and too wild to be subjugated to hauling bricks to build stuff for oppressive kings and queens. They preferred to be free and run wild and chuck spears at hippos and run from hippos when hippos hand enough of the Negroes and turned around to chomp off the Negroes’ ass.

For every gain, there’s a loss. Chinese may have built a great civilization, but look at those scrawners. Non-asian women feel no excitement about Chinese men, and just about any good-looking Chinese woman in the US would rather marry a whitey, Jew, or Negro than some yellow scrawner. Asian women are the story of the horniness of women with hots for bigger/tougher warriors. Despite matter of IQ, if a white guy was given a chance to become a Negro or a yellow, I’ll bet he’d rather be Long Dong Silver than Wong Dong Lee.

pizza with hot pepper #racist unz.com

We got ‘well-integrated’ black/west indian middle class here too. Look at the likes of Obama and Holder. There is a large black middle class here.
But we also have lots of problem blacks.

Btw, was it the well-integrated blacks who were burning London down a few yrs back?
Also, keep in mind that smart blacks in UK and US have a white society in which to integrate with.

But in all-black nations, there is no whiteness-maintained-by-whites for blacks to integrate into. So, blackness dominates, and boy oh boy, it sure does suck.

Also, keep in mind that distance between UK and Africa/Jamaica tends to favor those with some education with the means to make the trip.
In contrast, US brought over lots of low IQ blacks during the slave trade. There was less demographic filter.

But well-integrated or not, how does it feel for white British guys to be seen by their own women as a bunch of wussy boys in contrast to Negro men? Lots of British women get it on with black men, which means that they racially-sexually prefer Negro men over white men. It means they regard white men, the males of their own race, to be subpar/inferior men.

Is this the future that white British men want for themselves and their sons?
Wussy and pathetic.

pizza with hot pepper #racist unz.com

Africa is huge and its population is exploding. Western Europe is tiny and its native population is shrinking. On top of that, blacks are bigger, stronger, more aggressive, and less intelligent. Why would open borders between Europe and Africa be a good thing? Only an anti-white lunatic would endorse such a thing. But then, one has to be privileged to harbor such ‘ideals’. If indeed the elites of Europe had to live under South African conditions, how would they feel about open borders? But they got their nice homes and posh clubs and private schools for their kids. They have the white lifestyle for now but push ‘diversity’ because PC is the ‘respectable’ thing among the status-obsessed elites thanks to the Eskimos who control the academia, media, and governments.

PS. White folks have gone crazy. I recall what some Chinese guy said at my fav chop suep carryout joint. He was self-critical of Chinese. He say Chinese people stupid so long. Australia big empty land and for taking by anyone who find it. If Chinese build boat and go there, it all belong to Chinese now. It much closer to Asia than Europe, but English get it but Chinese no get it because Chinese too stupid and no like adventure. They just stay in China and eat rice.

I suppose that’s true. If Chinese had been just a little more adventurous, they could have claimed all of Australia long before the Brits even set forth on the high seas.
But I told him not to worry. White people are crazy in all parts of the world. English will hand over their nation to Africans and Pakistanis, American whites will hand over their nation to browns and blacks, and Aussies will hand over their nation to Chinese, Indians, and other Asians.
Whites are truly sick in the head. There’s no other explanation.

Jefferson #racist unz.com

The left has called James D. Watson a racist, even though he has Sub Saharan African admixture. But according to left wing logic, people with Sub Saharan African blood are not capable of being racist. But than again that did not stop them from calling George Zimmerman a racist even though he also has Sub Saharan African admixture.

Maybe there is a minimum Sub Saharan African admixture requirement in order to be exempt from being called a racist instead of just any drop of SSA blood will do.

Or maybe the “not capable of being racist” logic only applies to people of Sub Saharan African descent who actually self identify themselves as Black and not to those of SSA that do not self identify themselves as Black.

Either way the left sure is bipolar on the issue of the one drop rule and race in general. They pick and choose when to use the one drop rule to classify someone as Black or not. They are cafeteria one droppers.

George Zimmerman is “White” but Benjamin Jealous of the NAACP is “Black”, even though Benjamin is even more light skin than Zimmerman. Both of them have White fathers.

Next page