navaros

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

How is America a completely evil cesspool?

For one thing, it willingly participates in committing the most egregious atrocity/crime against humanity that has ever existed in the history of mankind, by legally murdering hundreds of thousands of babies per year. It glosses over those murders with false label euphemisms designed to pretend as if they are not murders, like "abortion," "women's rights," "right to choose," etc...but just like a rose by any other name is still a rose, legalized mass murders by any other name are still legalized mass murders. Nothing but a completely evil cesspool would do that.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Christians have been uniformly persecuted in public schools at every level for approximately the past 65+ years by way of having instructors teach the untrue faith-based religion of darwinism as "fact" and "truth" in place of God's antithetical and historical account which is actually true. Not only that, but God's truth is banned from those same classrooms.

And that suppression of Christianity for the sake of committing indoctrination into darwinism is sanctioned and enforced by the state.

That's persecution to a "T."

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

There is no such thing as "creationists" as distinct from "Christians." All Christians believe the Bible, and therefore all Christians know that God is Male and has a Penis.

Anyone who denies those facts would be a denier of the Bible, and therefore, by definition, not a Christian..

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

It's a bad sign when you have to make up *beep*

I have no idea what you mean by that. That statement is incoherent. I made nothing up.

I could easily ask other creationists what they think about God having a penis,

There is no such thing as "creationists" as distinct from "Christians." All Christians believe the Bible, and therefore all Christians know that God is Male and has a Penis.

Anyone who denies those facts would be a denier of the Bible, and therefore, by definition, not a Christian.

they'd answer that whoever believes that belongs in an asylum.

No they wouldn't. If asylums came up at all, then they would say that Bible deniers such as yourself should be in them.

Even amongst other creationists, you'd be a laughingstock.

No I wouldn't. As I said, all legitimate Christians believe the Bible, and the Bible makes 100% clear that God has a Penis, therefore no legitimate Christian would deny that truth.

But let's pretend you did find people who profess to believe in the Bible whilst, in actuality, they deny it. And those people laugh at me. Would I care? No. Because God and I get the last laugh together as we are partying it up forever in Heaven, wherein the mocking Bible deniers of which you speak shall never enter.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

What kind of immoralities are you talking about?

As examples, godly people are against the following immoralities:

- Fornication
- Onanism
- Using illegal drugs
- Using foul language
- Taking the LORD's name in vain
- Murdering babies via 'abortion'
- Murdering babies via 'stem cell research'
- Murdering the disabled and/or elderly via 'euthanasia'
- Indoctrinating students with darwinistic beliefs in public schools

Now, contrast that with atheists. atheists are by and large, if not universally, in favor of all of those immoralities.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

The thread title is an oxymoron. Christianity and politics are the same thing - not different things, as the thread tile implies.

I.e. Christians are obligated to oppose evil, and one cannot oppose evil without at the same time clashing with evildoers who promote a political agenda about indulging in evil.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

[The actress Melissa (Joan Hart), who makes no secret of her strong commitment to Christianity]

That's pretty odd coming from a woman who willingly agreed to pose in sexually provocative ways for Maxim magazine, knowing full-well that the idea behind doing that was to encourage its male readers to indulge in Onanism to images of her.

That's not something a woman with a "strong commitment to Christianity" would do.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

In recent months, Liberty University has endorsed Trump. That made me lose some respect for Liberty University. They should be able easily to discern that Trump is an liberal/evil man who does not believe in Christian/normal-non-psychopathic person values like preventing the murders of unborn babies.

I am disappointed that LU has made such a grievous moral error.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

It [the morning after pill] may or may not be murdering babies. It depends if it is or is not being used to murder a baby in the form of a fertilized egg. AFAIK there is no way to guarantee that it wouldn't murder a baby though, so non-murderers shouldn't ever take it. However, I'm not an expert on that point, so if there is one that guarantees not to murder a fertilized egg baby, then taking that would not be murdering babies.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

That's highly debatable. paganism is just an offshoot of satanism (satan is the head false god demon who runs both of those religions) so I'll use the word "paganism" simultaneously to describe both.

paganism was very dominant for an extremely long time. It had a decline for a few centuries, but then it came back in the 1800's in the form of darwinism, and darwinism (thus paganism) now dominates society with its evil iron fist.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Christians want your soul to spend eternity in paradise a.k.a. Heaven.

atheists, on the other hand, couldn't care less about your soul, nor if you instead spend eternity in Hell.

So how does that not make the Christians the good guys and the atheists the bad guys?

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

No, I'm not kidding.

Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron are among the very few high profile Bible-believing Christians in the world. That makes it all the more the shame to see one of them ruin his great work for no good reason with an unnecessary & nefarious endorsement.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

There is no "debate." "Abortion" is cold-blooded, brutal murder, period. And there is no such thing as "abortion." When you say "abortion," you are using that word as a euphemism for "murdering babies." Murderers should indeed be ashamed of themselves. And "women" would not ever murder their own babies, so you are incorrect also when you use the word "women" as a euphemism for "murderers."

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

[Science may contradict logic, but it doesn't contradict facts the way religion does.]

Sure it does, at least, the darwinism which you mislabel as "science" does.

Here are some of the facts that your so-called "science" contradicts but which God's Word does not:

The scientific law of biogenesis: only life can begat life.

Each kind only ever reproduces after it's own kind.

God created the kinds male and female.

And moreover, darwinists' own self-proclaimed "facts" contradict each other all the time. I.e. Pluto is a planet vs. Pluto is not a planet, brontosaurus is a dinosaur vs. brontosaurus is not a dinosaur. Those are completely contradictory claims, all of which your darwinist kind have lyingly proclaimed as "scientific facts." That is irrefutable evidence that darwinists' claims about what is "science" or "fact" are not reliable and cannot be trusted.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

[No one thinks Darwin is a god.]


Yet darwinists glorify his name, build gigantic statues/graven images/idols of him, write letters to him despite the fact that he is long dead and frying in Hell, celebrate him with a special holiday, perpetuate his myths endlessly in every medium possible, and try to silence anyone who speaks against him or the mythology he invented.

If they don't think that he is a god, why do they treat him like a god in all of those ways?

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

[Science is constantly striving to correct itself. What's wrong with that?]

There would be no possible room to "correct" itself unless its original claims were untrue bull crap in the first place. The new "corrected" claims are untrue bull crap too, which is why they in turn become "corrected" later on as well, with additional untrue bull crap. It's a never-ending cycle of untrue bull crap, all of which is falsely presented as "fact."

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Your god, darwin, is a false one, yesanything, and so too is the evil power behind him (satan), but the God of the Bible is not.

And contrary to what your OP implies, your evolution story has a lot more major problems than just the problem that to begin, it needs to resort to whacky mystical explanations which impossibly violate the scientific law of biogenesis which states that only life can begat life.

The answer is not to make something up which is what all gods are.

Are you kidding me? evolutionists make up stuff all the time. Why do you think sometimes brontosaurus is a dinosaur, and then sometimes brontosaurus is not a dinosaur, and then sometimes brontosaurus is a dinosaur again? Why do you think for several decades Pluto is a planet, then all of a sudden Pluto is not a planet? Why do you think one week ida darwinus is the "missing link" that finally "proves" that apes transformed into men, and the next week, ida is just a lemur? Why do you think evolutionists universally promoted the Piltdown Man fraud, in museums and everywhere else, as "scientific fact" to "prove" evolution to the public worldwide, for over 40 years? etc. etc. That kind of list could go on endlessly.

The only way things like that could happen is by a) evolutionists making things up and b) the things they make up are full of crap.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

The cancer of feminism has influenced most women today to believe that they must be masculine and act like men. Of course, women who follow that kind of warped mindset are completely undesirable to all men.

I.e. Just look at hilary clinton - one of the most unwomanly "women" of all-time, yet also one of the most popular - although I personally don't consider hilary to be either a woman or a she...but hilary is generally looked upon as a "woman role model" . With someone like hilary as the model for what a woman is, that's a telltale sign that society is all fubared to Hell and that nowadays real women are very scarce.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

The real Founding Fathers of America came to it in the 1600's and they were Bible-believing Christians in almost exactly the same way as is Kirk Cameron.

The Founding Fathers that you speak of separated church from state in order so that Bible-believing Christians did not have their freedom of religion infringed upon by evil & ungodly government officials who might otherwise impose their evil forms of religion upon the population, as had already happened for centuries before in England with its evil Kings and evil Queens.

This modern myth that people like you promote, that the Founding Fathers disliked religion and made their decisions on that basis, is a complete distortion and re-writing of history in order to pretend as if it was in line with your modern God-hating agenda.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Isn't that what heaven is supposedly like? Where everything is perfect and no one can come to harm?

Sure, but keep in mind this question: who is in Heaven?

Answer: the very few people who during their time on earth chose to believe in and obey God (this point is especially what almost no one does) and accept Jesus' payment of their sin debt. That all sounds very simple, but almost no one actually does it.

In other words, the population of Heaven is what we could call in human terms "a biased sample." Only the cream of the crop of the human population gets in, and they got in because they chose to live godly lives.

Now, compare that to the unbiased sample that comprises 99.999999999+% of the humans on the earth who are ungodly. They either proactively hate God, or are indifferent to God. In either case, they fail to obey God, and they commit acts of evil constantly. Those type of people never get into Heaven. And them not being allowed in is one of the main reasons why Heaven is able to be perfect.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" - Gilman

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

There is no such thing as 'fetus.' 'Fetus' is in fact just another synonym for the word 'baby, a synonym which feminists use to try to gloss over their acts of murder and pretend they are not murdering babies, even though they are.

Just like the word 'abortion' when applied to humans is just another name for 'murder,' again meant to pretend that feminists' acts of murder are not murder.

In other words, a baby by the name of 'fetus' is still a baby, and a murder by the name of 'abortion' is still murder. Playing semantic word games does not change those facts.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

atheists are bitter because they know that that according to their own belief system, their lives have no purpose and no meaning and after they expire from their pointless lives, all that awaits them is nothingness.

On top of that, many of them are also bitter because although they never admit it out loud, they realize deep down that the Bible is correct and that they will one day have to give an account to God for their evil ways, and so they are terrified of what will happen to them when they come before the Judgement Seat of Christ.

So all of that bitterness manifests itself into the constant mocking/insulting/hateful attacks against God, morality, and anyone who does not share their worldview. When they do that, atheists are patting themselves on the back and giving each other winks & nudges as if to say: "Although our existences are pointless, and although many of us are secretly terrified at having to one day give an account of our lives to God, at least we can make ourselves feel better by calling ourselves more intelligent than those who do not share our beliefs."

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

"Virtually all shows before 1970 could be described as wholesome, with nothing more than slight suggestive lines in such programs as Batman, as mentioned elsewhere here."

That's not always true. For example the Twilight Zone (1959) is full of foul language its characters often take the LORD's name in vain. It is also full of immoral lines, such as: one time an old man tells a kid to "go play with a switchblade," another time a character talks about "slitting wrists," and many other times the characters talk frankly about fornicating and/or committing adultery and/or are depicted actually doing so on-screen (granted, it doesn't actually show them doing the final part of those things, but the images strongly suggest that they are about to...and the blunt dialogue outright blatantly admits it). It's definitely nowhere close to being wholesome.

But maybe the Twilight Zone was the first trashy show, and an anomaly for its time? I'm not sure about that, but I do know that even if it's the only show to do so, it definitely makes its era of TV impure and untrustworthy.

I was actually shocked to discover those things in the Twilight Zone, since LITB directly references it in one episode, and that's how LITB referred me to it. Because of the referral and the time when it was made, I was expecting it to be wholesome like LITB, but it quickly took a huge steamin' dump all over that reasonable expectation.

I do agree though that in general, TV became a lot more trashy after the 60's.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

(On the subject of the film "God’s Not Dead")

Before making this post, I revisited this film so that the evil, ungodly things that Josh did are fresh in my mind.

In his first speech, Josh affirms the darwinist-alleged, Bible-denying age of the universe (13.7B years). He also affirms darwinists' big bang theory, whilst adding in front of it the caveat that God did it.

In his third speech, Josh directly affirms that evolution is true and again, adds a God did it caveat in front. He then goes on to make that same affirmation a second time when he validates the darwinist idea that all forms of life transformed into each other over 3.8B years. To that he tacks on another caveat, that within those 3.8B years, evolution happened fast. Next, he inappropriately conflates his ungodly argument with a quotation from Genesis that in reality completely debunks everything that he just said and will continue to say. He finishes with yet another affirmation that the process of evolution is true, and yet again tacks on the caveat but God did it.

In his fourth speech, Josh finally says something compatible with the Bible, by pointing out that evil exists in the world due to God allowing Free Will. However, that fact also completely debunks all the darwin-glorifying, anti-God, anti-Christian, anti-Bible propaganda which he spouted previously. To wit, if evolution is true, then evil is necessarily not a consequence of Free Will, but rather, evil must always have existed in the world, long before any sentient beings who had Free Will did. Moreover, that of course would point to an evil god, who must have put evil into the world without justification, for no reason other than because he too is evil (that would be a satanic god, not the God of the Bible).

Given all that evidence, there is no reasonable way you can possibly legitimately argue that Josh didn't glorify darwin and affirm evolution and thereby deny God, the Bible and Christianity.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

"The only truth is science"

Oh yeah? Then why is science always being forced to admit that the 'facts' it told last week were lies? For example, one year Pluto is a planet, the next year Pluto is not a planet. One year Brontosaurus is a dinosaur, the next year Brontosaurus is not a dinosaur, and the next year Brontosaurus is a dinosaur again! Those are just two out of countless examples.

The irrefutable fact is that 'science' is constantly changing its malarkey stories, and if those stories were true facts rather than malarkey fabricated stories in the first place, it would be impossible for them to change.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

ttp://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/chef-cooking-snake-dies-after- 4088634

"A chef preparing a dish from cobra flesh died when the snake's head bit him - 20 minutes AFTER it was cut off."


This news shows that just like Genesis says, the serpent is the most cunning creature, hence that is why satan possessed a serpent to trick Eve.

This incident also proves as true the murderous evil power of snakes, which corroborates their evil as described in Genesis and why God chose to curse them.

In other words, in this post I have provided a real-life example that makes ernie's mocking strawman posts against godly people, wherein he says things like "you believe in a talking snake!", look like the tomfoolery that they are.

Eat crow, ern.[biggrin]

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

"Why is God male?"

Because He is. That's like saying "why am I female?" or "why is my mother female?" or "why is my father male?"

"Does he have male genitalia?"

Of course He does.

"It seems silly for the creator of the universe to have a wang and yet not have a female"

That's because you are thinking of God in dirty, worldly, fleshy terms. God's Member does not conform to those debased forms of thought.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

"You cannot honestly think that a chef accidentally stabbing his finger on a snake's tooth involved planning on the part of the snake."

What you said is not what happened. What really happened was this:

The severed snake head spent 20 minutes pretending to be dead, then woke up and bit the chef to death at the exact moment when it noticed that it had the chance. The serpent, using only its long ago severed head, performed the ultimate in cunning ambush. It's like a scene from a horror movie except it happened in real-life, because the chef underestimated the cunning of the serpent.

I feel bad for the chef dying, but maybe if he paid more attention to the Bible he would have realized that screwing around with serpents is a bad idea, and underestimating their powers of evil and cunning are especially bad ideas, hence he would not be dead now.

Navaros #sexist imdb.com

Title of the posting: How come there are no women in this "all-female" Ghostbusters?

I've read that that this will be an "all-female" Ghostbusters.

I've seen a couple of publicity photos for this film.

In those photos, I did not see a single woman.

All I saw were four or so butt-ugly, monstrous, masculine brutes.

Does it not stand to reason that an "all-female" Ghostbusters should actually have women in it?

Someone messed up there, big-time!

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Every Christian since the dawn of time has always known that God has a Penis. I tried to clarify that fact for ignorant atheists who mis-stated the fact, and falsely claimed that I said God was biological, which is something that I never said.

You and your cabal of atheist pals - most of whom are thieves and stalkers - may laugh it up because you are immature, but that's the truth and that's what the Bible says. If you were mature than you would not find it hilarious every time someone says "Penis," and you would not mock God's Word. But as a Bible denialist who serves mammon rather than God, that is of course not what you do.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com


That's correct. No studying is necessary to know evolution is wrong.

One needs only to ask one question:

Post the evidence for evolution.

darwinists cannot do this, because there is none.

darwinists will say that there is evidence for evolution, but that's a lie.

Any 'evidence' a darwinist ever brings up, or ever can bring up, is always loaded with presuppositions and assumptions that evolution is true. Ergo, that is faith, not evidence.

No evidence for the claim that evolution is true = no reason to believe that evolution is true.

No studying is required to reach that conclusion. Indeed, anyone with common sense, and especially anyone with education in critical thinking, must inevitably reach that conclusion.

The only ones who wouldn't reach that conclusion are those who either have no common sense, and/or those who do not know how to think critically and/or those who know how to think critically but choose not to regarding darwinism.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

There is no such thing as 'fundamentalist,' except for darwinist/atheists fundamentalists who rabidly stalk, steal from, slander, attack, and try to silence anyone who speaks out against their worldview.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com


Actually, darwinists like miller are the ones who lied at the trial, such as by saying that 'evolution can be proven wrong.' darwinists will never accept evolution as wrong because when irrefutable evidence that proves it wrong, like soft tissue in t-rex, comes out, they just tell more lies about it to say pretend evolution is true.

darwinists have also lied at other court trials and to the public for decades. The whole history of evolutionism is based on nothing but lies by darwinists, and those lies presented as 'facts.' I.e. Piltdown Man fraud/hoax was propagated by darwinists for over 40 years!!! And darwinists lied in court such as at the Scopes trial to use that fraud to 'prove' that evolution is true.

And that's just one of many of darwinists frauds/lies/hoaxes. Here's a bunch of others: ida darwinus, lucy, nebraska man, java man, neanderthal man, cromagnon man, peking man, nutcracker man, archaeopteryx, tiktaalik, 'vestigal' organs, 'junk' dna, soft tissue in t-rex, haeckel's fraudulent drawings etc. etc

They lied again at dover also by saying that similiarity in a genome means that apes transformed into men.

darwinists got nothing but lies.

darwinists are the kings of liars.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Can you blame them? They are always called "retards," "idiots," "morons," "fundies" and all kinds of other horrible names. They often get slandered, stalked, and have their property stolen and changed by crazy atheist psychopaths, including many right here who use IMDB as a platform to do those things.

xtians are perfect saints in comparison to the infinitely more abusive atheists that they have to put up with.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com


How about:

atheist beliefs in darwinism.
atheist beliefs in murdering babies.
atheist beliefs in murdering the severely handicapped by slow starvation and dehydration (i.e. Terri Schiavo).
atheists beliefs in stalking and theft (most atheists who are on IMDB do these things)
atheist beliefs in hating, silencing and personally attacking anyone who opposes their viewpoints.
atheist beliefs in space aliens.
atheist beliefs that george carlin is funny and brilliant.
atheist beliefs that bill maher is brilliant.
atheist beliefs that penn and teller are brilliant.
atheist beliefs in supporting almost every immoral cause that exists.

Almost every atheist, if not every atheist, believes in those things.

It's like the poster said, atheists share tons of common beliefs, many of which are extreme, especially the pro-murder beliefs that atheists have.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com


Everyone has a religion and a god. Yours religion is atheism and your god is nature, albeit a false version of nature, one based on the fabrications darwinists make about nature which give it powers that it does not have in reality.

Navaros #fundie forum.dune2k.com

[What are your arguments exactly to support fascism? What do you call fascism exactly?]

i didn't read a bunch of technical jargon and hot air on the subject so i can't answer in a "formal" way but here's the way i see it:

the average person is a blithering idiot. so why then, would it make sense to have a mob of blithering idiots elect a government???! these blithering idiots are naturally going to elect a government which is also full of blithering idiots! is that "progress"? i say not.

think of Facism as a game of "Lemmings". the average person is a Lemming. The Facist Leader is the guy who controls the Lemmings for their own best interests to be met (ie: the "player" in a game of Lemmings).

better to have a genius who knows what he's doing take control of the blithering idiots and tell them what's good for them, since he knows better what is good for them than they do, because they are blithering idiots.

secondly, one thing the Bible says is true which can basically be summed up as: "All men are born evil". since all men are naturally evil, if given the opportunity en massse, they will naturally elect an EVIL lot of blithering idiots to make their laws. this results in the immoral cesspool-esque society that is now North America. if one righteous man takes charge, he can purge much of this evil away from the society and make it somewhat moral. you may say, "but the man in charge would be evil, too!" and yes that is true to some degree; but a smart, devoted man with strong convictions is still far less evil than your Average Joe Blithering.

Navaros #fundie forum.dune2k.com

Akriku: the problem with your babbling in the original post is that evidence itself is subjective

tell me: you believe in carbon-dating? if a scientist says that a rock is 50 million years old and he has "proven" that by carbon-dating, would you believe him? would you believe he has proved it?

if so - then you are believing him based on FAITH in the idea of carbon-dating. you do not KNOW that the rock is as old as he claims it is. but based on faith in an idea - that is what determines whether or not you accept something as valid "evidence" or not

this principle is not limited to the example i've used. for almost anything that you state which contradicts religious texts - i could PROVE to you how your statement has NOT been proven with evidence - but rather is based on faith and speculation on your part.

Navaros #fundie forum.dune2k.com

Right now I am having propaganda being shoved down my throat by a supposedly-reputable "NEWS"cast. This propaganda is advocating the freakish, abominable act of Satanism known as Test Tube Babies, or IVF.

Man is not God. Man should not pretend to be God. Test Tube Babies is going wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too far.

All Test Tube Babies as well as anyone who in any way participates in any procedures that relate to the creation of such Abominations or laws that allow it - should be executed without trial.

Test Tube Babies are Unholy Abominations and just plain ol' Freaks of Nature.

For Men who see fit to play God, it's time for them to be executed without delay and go have some "Quality Time" with the one and only REAL God; whereupon they will receive just recompense for their participation in the evil, ungodly Test Tube Baby Satanic Rituals.

[What about people who cant have children but can if they put them in a test tube?]

then they weren't meant to have children! so they should stop OBSESSING over something they weren't meant to have!!!

i'd like to make $20 Million a year as a Professional Athlete, what about me?HuhHuh!!!!!!!!!! I can't do it, but I really really really want to!!!! So why doesn't someone invent a barbaric, demonic procedure to help ME out with what *I* want?

the reason: because I am not obsessed with trying to have what I was not meant to have! but with Test Tube Babies, there are tons of mentally-deranged sickos whose illness causes them to do perverted things like obsess over things they have no need to obsess over; and these obsessions cause them to partake in demonic acts such as making Test Tube Babies

Navaros #fundie #homophobia #forced-birth forum.dune2k.com

[Note the dialogue of Euthypho and Socrates: conclusion that what is pious is not because of the quality that it is loved by a god, but for a reason inherent in it, and that the god loves it because it is good.]


Socrates is in Hell right now, burning as we speak. He knew nothing of God, or what is good. So you picked a very bad example to quote from about this subject.


Humans do not have minds capable of knowing what is "good" better than God does. For example, you see many people on this site promoting and/or defending evil causes such as "homosexuality" (one reason why Socrates is now in Hell, by the way) and genocide against human children. They have no basis for saying these things are "good", yet they do. These things are in fact very evil. Many men who society considers "wise" are actually fools. So says God, and God is correct.

God knows what is good and what is not good. His opinion is the one that counts. Not the petty, evil opinion of man. Christ has said that mankind will naturally promote wickedness and evil instead of doing good. That is why you see things like "Gay Pride Parades" and genocide against children. Because the foolishness of man says that "these things are good!" It does not matter how many say that evil things are good - evil things will *NEVER* be good.

It is true that Atheists have no morality. Because a man in his natural state will almost always automatically promote and defend evildoings. Like Akriku and ACElethal and other Atheists promoting "homosexuality", for example. To be moral requires a man to leave his natural state and allow himself to become righteous. Atheists almost never have a reason to do this since they do not obey God's commands, and hence most Atheists have no morality

Navaros #fundie forum.dune2k.com

The God of the Bible is an angry jealous God. He says so quite clearly many times over. He is a tough guy. He does not tolerate any nonsense, and will not be mocked. He places His worth above everything else because He is the most important thing in the universe. If you created the universe, would *YOU* tolerate miniscule, filthy, immoral, repuganant creatures that you made to disrespect you by taking your name in Vain etc.? k bad example, *you* probably would, but most normal people would not. it is perfectly reasonable for the Head Honcho to call the shots and demand respect for Himself as one of the most important laws.

Navaros #fundie forum.dune2k.com

the good part about this is that when God decides to rain down Fire & Brimstone upon these evil-doers [or whatever sort of other punishment He sees fit], He only has to target one very-specific building in order to nuke a whole whackload of them at once. this is essentially making God's job a lot easier. for that reason, i'm all for it.


and, it takes a lot of diseases like A.I.D.S. out of the public system so normal kids don't get it by accident, like the guys who would normally be beating up these "gay" kids and making them bleed. the amount of pestilence-carrying students will be dramatically decreased in schools which have these these "gay kids" removed to go to their own "gay school". for that reason, i'm all for it yet again

Navaros #homophobia forum.dune2k.com

[. Twist of nature, comparable to i.e.siamese twins...

...or to Down's syndrome.]

...or to the most similar of all mental disorders to "homosexuality": pedophilia

it has been scientifically proven that "homosexuality" is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain combined with an over-exaggeration of the need to be loved

just because it is a genetic defect, that does not *exscuse* it. pedophiles and serial killers are born with mental defects too; and that does not justify their deviant behaviour. neither does it in the case of "homosexuality"

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

[on "Law & Order: Criminal Intent")

Some years ago I watched a few episodes of this show and then they aired an episode that was nothing more than sickening pro-abortion propaganda. After that disgusting piece of crap, I stopped watching this show.

The other day I was flicking through the channels and I thought I happened upon a made-for-TV mafia movie or something. I like mafia movies so I figured: "Ok, let's see what this is." Then I found out it was this show.

I was shocked though when after the credits instead of seeing Vincent D'Onofrio with dashing young moviestar-like good looks, I saw what looked to be a totally different person entirely. Vincent D'Onofrio has become an ugly, fat old slob!

Likewise, Kathryn Erbe now looks like a haggard witch.

My theory as to why these actors' looks both got totally shot to Hell is that it is the sin of them making pro-abortion propaganda catching up with them and manifesting itself physically in their now-hideous looks.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

darwinists think playing dungeons and dragons is cool. In fact, they often plagiarize dungeons and dragons by stating that there are multiple universes and this is just one of billions of universes, therefore that is how darwinism can be true.

Yes, although it's just nonsense fantasy in dungeons and dragons, darwinists have taken that and turned it into a crackpot idea that they actually, truly believe is part of real-life.

I can't even begin to tell you how many dozens of times I've seen darwinists advocating that crackpot, dungeons and dragons plagiarized idea on the Expelled board.

Just goes to show once again that darwinists are batty.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

[about the scientific method]

What you should do is:

1) Stop assuming darwinism is true just because you want it to be true.

2) Stop lying all the time by saying that evolution is fact, science, and has evidence; it is not, and is not, and has none.

3) Repent from your ungodly lifestyle and behaviours.

4) Stop pretending that you would ever discard darwinism; because you darn well know that you will always believe it is true, no matter what, period and you and your kind spin any and all evidence that destroys it as 'evidence for it '. Put more simply, stop trying to fool the naive into believing darwinism is science and you are open-minded enough to discard darwinism one day; because everyone knows that is just more lies from you (you must be taking lessons from ken miller who told similar lies at the Dover trial...or maybe its just all part of the standard darwinist playbook).

Next page