If it wasn't for Red States being subsidized by the federal government to
keep food prices down, blue states could not afford to eat and would
starve to death. That might not be a bad thing in the long run.
Congrats to Megan Rape-a-ho' for upholding the liberal way and losing.
Trump says he will burn the citation for her medal of freedom when he is
elected again.
9 comments
Trump says he will burn the citation for her medal of freedom when he is
elected again.
I highly doubt that that’s how you go about rescinding an accolade the bearer has proven herself unworthy of. Really, this sounds like nothing more than wanton destruction of government records in an ostentatious yet hollow display of spite. Did his handlers inform him that he has no case against her (I do not know anything about this Megan whose last name presumably is not actually Rape-a-bo’), or is Trump simply that stupid?
If it wasn't for Blue states subsidizing Red states, Red states would be mired in poverty and ignorance (well, *greater* ignorance), and Blue states could buy plenty of food from elsewhere in the world. Or just buy up and take over Red areas to grow their own. That might not be a bad thing in the long run.
I’m not entirely sure what the context is here but I love that flowchart and how oblivious so many are to the real implications: If the poor red states were not subsidized the wealthy blue states could not eat, which isn’t true but let’s follow this train as though that were. Those same red states believe that subsidizing the working poor in the same way would cause *everyone* to become beggars, despite making the claim that others are rich off that subsidized work. Moreover, they fail to see that red states are subsidized precisely because their agriculture is not profitable enough to sustain their own states and somehow think cutting off their buyers will not tank their already insufficient income. And here, they think using the halting of production as a threat against the blue “elites” that think the poor should be subsidized should be a viable threat to get them to stop with the very policies keeping them afloat. Which is again exactly the politics conservatives argue against because socialism.
It’s such condensed clusterfuck of contradiction I’m honestly chuckling here.
@Malingspann #205935
Oh don’t you know? Everyone of us in a red state are survivalist subsistence farmer spec op snipers! /s
Gods, I never thought that I’d miss the days where the stupidiest stereotypes about us southerners just came from ignorant northerners.
I see several suggestions about starving people for political reasons lately. That is, the advocacy for crimes against humanity. Here's another: https://fstdt.com/56Q3BPWS29RJJ
During the Russian civil war, the Red and White terror resulted, among other atrocities, in famine, refusing to sell food to those they considered to be vermin, dehumanized as such. Cannibalism also happened. Any suggestion to try to starve other people is the advocacy for pure evil. Even during outright war, one of the reasons Israel officials have been issued arrest warrants by the ICC.
For this reason, I suggest #psycho
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.