Aztec metaphysics being fundamentally monist and much alike to Platonism and Vedanta evidences the truth of the doctrine. It is universally observed, unveiled in their particular contexts.
It also opens up Aztec religion to deeper inspection via Platonic understanding.
Is it a uniquely Anglosphere phenomenon (by virtue of American cultural imperialism, of course) that there is a serious debate between "conservative Christians" and "LGBT et al" over whether or not homosexuality is a choice?
And just like every debate that manages to filter into the conversation of common people, both sides opt for the extreme: for conservatives, it is a conscious choice to not be heterosexual; and for progressives, a person is simply born gay. Both wrong, both stupid.
Then how does gayness come about if both are wrong?
Though humanity particulates into two sexes, sexual communion between them brings unifying reversion. This temporal reversion conjoins them into an immanent 'one', a state participating of god - a oneness and union mirroring the oneness and union of the divine itself.
But as with all encosmic things, our primal knowledge of sex is that known via sense. This level is little different to that of other species; desire is for the act alone, not for the union or product. For those overwhelmed by indulgence, having a sex preference is preventative.
This kind accounts only for a small number, however. The majority of those who peel from the sexual norm have so due to certain sensible 'impositions' impressed upon the mind from without, their material conditions inducing a reaction that results in novel sexuality.
Although explicit study into causes of sexuality has become a minefield due to politics, it is known that the frequency of having been a victim of historic or ongoing abuse (sexual or domestic) among those who identify by novel sexualities is disproportionately high.
Culture has also increasingly normalised novel sexuality, pressing it strongly among youth through sex education and media. Alongside this is consumerism's encouragement of selfishness and its glorification of frivolous and indulgent lifestyles.
This is just absolute speculation.
It's not speculation, it's Platonic metaphysics.
There are many cases throughout Roman history where poor religious practices and botched rituals were followed by Roman failure. Perhaps most depressingly was the case with Emperor Julian’s invasion of Parthia. According to Ammianus Marcellinus, while Emperor Julian was in Circesium (a Roman fort city in modern Syria) he received letters from his friend Praetorian prefect Flavius Sallustius “entreating him to suspend his expedition against the Parthians, and imploring him not in such an unseasonable manner to rush on irrevocable destruction before propitiating the gods.”
This was far from the only bad omen that beset Emperor Julian, for an earthquake had struck Constantinople, “which those skilful in divination declares to be an unfavourable omen to a ruler about to invade a foreign country”, among yet more omens I’ll omit for brevity’s sake. The unfortunate result of these is the death of Emperor Julian and the complete failure of his campaign following his death.
So let the following superior understanding be held more in common than the former inferior understanding: in the Cultus Deorum we shall maintain knowledge of the following divine truths:
that all gods are good and are never malicious towards the cosmos nor to one another
that they never lust, never envy, never want, and never desire, as they are whole and thus do not have need to want anything
that any story, myth, fable, or legend that suggests that they do want is to be interpreted by philosophers and theologians and not accepted as literally reflective of a god’s true nature.
I have a cousin who is the exact same age as me - 26 Born on the same day. This year, she had her fourth baby. Today, I bought my fourth high end (l mean really high end - like Gucci) purse, that I can afford because I put all my eggs in the career basket. I grew up INCREDIBLY poor. It is like a dream come true to live like this. Tomorrow I'm going to sleep in until about 11, wake up, and check to see if it's shipped yet.
Fuck, I love being childfree.
Women like this need to actively convince themselves that mothers hate being mothers and derive little to no joy out of being a mother. They idolise the lifestyles they're taught to idolise and think they know they're more fulfilling than motherhood.
This is contradicted by fact of how frequent it is for women to drop out of the workforce after having a child; not because they'd find working and parenting too difficult to manage, but because the fulfilment they derive from mothering makes them want to mother full-time.
On many levels, the modern woman is made to believe many lies curated to maintain her belief that she really is living the best life. Whenever a woman contradicts this with a testimony of her experiences, she is always demeaned and belittled by women who know only one life.
This is the symbol of Hyrcanian Philosophy (Xeradé Varkâni) in general and, by extension, the new symbol for Prometheism or The Prometheist Movement.
An abominable movement built upon the hatred of the gods, the surest way to muddy your soul.
@lost in the yugas
)))hersey((( against the (((Catholic Church))). Reminder the Gnosticism has it right and all other Xitian denominations are LARP worship for the Demiurge.
How can people bring themselves to believe literal comic book tier shit? Gnosticism gives no proofs, no serious metaphysics, no holistic and clear theology. All it does is assert a bunch of spurious shit and people just fucking believe it.
Humanity absolutely does my head in.
You CANNOT CHRISTIANISE ORPHISM. FUCK.
Christianity is nothing but BARBARIANS IN THE RUINS at this point.
"godless laicite is at the gates, ready to slaughter everything for secularism."
"what do we do?"
"attack the christian neoplatonists over minute details instead of fostering any sense of solidarity and mutual understanding in front of the greater liberal evil, of course!"
These are the stupidest kinds of opinions. Christians are godless and deserve to be fought. There is no "unity" with Christians, they would turn on us the moment they saw it fit to. They seek total conquest, so we must seek the same.
The "YHWH is a daemon" trope, by falling into genetic fallacies, doesn't help anyone because it doesn't explain Christian mysticism nor the Incarnation; becoming an argument disjunct from Christianity. Marcionism. So let's explain the soteriological necessity of the Incarnation.
We can explain Christian mysticism easily: to the degree Christianity maintained pious religion, it received good providence (the gods always prosper goodness). It doesn't mean it was free of falseness, and that falseness is its dedication to a false god.
The false god may not appear throughout the whole religion, indeed we can find parallels between the mystical behaviour of saints and gods, but nonetheless he is present; a kernel of corruption. The daemon crushed Rome and now he crushes all her sons.
(Andrew)
Oh, and astronomers literally found evidence for God and because they couldn't explain it they gave it a funny name, called it an 'anomaly' and forgot about it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_evil_(cosmology)
(Alexander Iulianus)
Rather, the Axis of Evil would go to proving the universe is eternal and would ruin linear-time religions like the Yahwist religions. There is no "creatio ex nihilio", as we always knew before theological stupidity took hold over our psyche.
The biggest issue I find with young women, is inability to seperate feeling from truth, feeling from right and wrong. They think religious and patriarchal authorities are bad because they feel uncomfortable about what they are told
The issue stems from the manner the case is made known to women.
Read religious writing speaking of women in the 18th and 19th centuries, women are praised as being "more moral", "more modest", "more godly". Women are instructed into becoming these things, but because men convinced themselves that they had these tendencies as intrinsic, their manner of instruction has been entirely masculine and ignorant to the feminine psyche. Women were instructed as if they were men, hence it was quite crude and imposing and dealt with "harsh truths". It worked because there was no alternative.
But once there was a competitor, it took women by storm as it was curated towards exploiting their psyche and built itself upon knowing how they think. There are outliers of women who stuck to the old doctrines, of course. But the vast bulk of women found themselves quickly converted as women are not drawn by innate tendency towards morality or modesty, and are instead drawn entirely by their instinct for self-security and preservation of the female sex.
Feminism suggested that there was a mortal threat, that of patriarchy, to their very being, indeed to all women. By indicating certain attitudes as being the source of this threat, they quickly bought into despising it. Now they continue to be bought by these same existential threats and it is very hard to win them back upon little but the insistence that patriarchy cares. They have been convinced it doesn't, so something entirely novel is required.
Solar atheists of Mark Brahmin out themselves guilty of racial self-hatred in this thread.
They deliberately misread the ancients to de-racialise them alike to progressive revisionists, they endorse Christianity's botched reading of Plato, and entrust modern academia with truth.
>Bruhmin solar atheist gets outed for racial self-hatred
>he blocks me
One of Typhon's many faces has been revealed.
Bruhmin, the prophet of solar atheism who corrupts the good cult of Apollo with evil denial of the Gods, demeaning our ancestors as backward dullards, happily argued with me inanely over soul—but once I noted their work rests upon racial self-hatred, he and his ilk blocked me.
Cowards flee when discovered of their evil. Despise these workers of evil. Prescribe them homo sacer- none but the Gods could intervene to save these wretched deceivers from any doom that would rightly fall upon them.
(The Aureus Press)
So quantum physicists are reaching NeoPlatonic conclusions, which is good, but what they are saying is being latched onto by 'space doesn't exist' gheylords, which is bad.
Why More Physicists Are Starting to Think Space and Time Are ‘Illusions’
(Alexander Iulianus)
The incessant pursuit of empiricism was lauded by atheists for its promise of finally destroying religious superstition and put in its place a robustly godless account of reality free from divinity.
Sadly for them, Platonism is true, and awaited them at the end of empiricism.
Psychical collectivism and hierarchy in women.
The actual utility of women’s twofold social nature can be understood as an instinctual mechanism where women perpetually test the ‘fitness’ of other women by their relentless hierarchising and rejecting. By this process, the women who attain and retain the acclaim of other women will generally be the ‘fittest’, these women typically appealing the most to men. They first privilege the collective, however, and most specifically the collective of women, because the survival of women has long historically relied upon communal cohesion and the human instinct of prioritising the concerns of women over that of men’s.
Rather than presuming that the instinct of privileging the survival and health of women over that of men’s to be present only among men, it is clear that this instinct is universal to both sexes.
Men tend to presume that the mental life of women is like his own, and so selfish acts are thought to be premeditated and deliberate. Women’s self-prioritisation is amoral and often so intimate with her natural behaviour she doesn’t even know herself to be doing it. Hence why when she is accused of being selfish, she is often confused and surprised and will find it hard to comprehend how he came to the conclusion. The question is made coherent when we know the instinct to preserve the female sex is innate to women as well.
So, unlike men who generally are indifferent to generalising remarks because the foundation of their sense of self is individualist, women can take the breaking of any woman’s integrity as being equivalent to breaking her own integrity.