Eliza Mondegreen:
So many people are bound by a loved one who identifies as trans. They are bound because the pain unbelief causes is real. So they keep their doubts to themselves. They don't follow certain lines of thought. They can't afford to. Whatever causes so much pain must be bad. Who wants to inflict pain on someone they love?
She just can't imagine that those cis people who support trans people did examine any doubts they had and did follow "certain lines of thought", but still in the end decided that they supported the gender identities of their trans loved ones, perhaps with even more certain conviction. No, they're all confused people, enchanted by evil witchcraft. If you ask me, it's the TER"F"s who can't afford to examine too closely contrary points of view.
@Jerryiothy #163399
I mean, I’m conflicted. She seems genuinely miserable and uncomfortable with it, not just because she haaates them.
Miserable and uncomfortable with it? What she's uncomfortable with is friends who defend transgender rights and don't agree with her bigoted attitudes towards trans people. Any sympathy she has here is for those "confused" cis people, not towards the trans people who she wants them to agree shouldn't be allowed to live their lives freely. If every cis person agreed with her transphobia, *poof*, there goes her misery and discomfort. And past that, the desire to create a world where people like me literally can't exist.
Yall are sorta proving her point though. No explanation of what she is doing wrong, no explanation of why trans people are valid, just insults and degradation.
We're proving her point? Because we haven't given an "explanation of why trans people are valid"? There are probably hundreds of places on the Web where you can find very good explanations of such. I don't know why you expect every trans person to justify our right to exist literally every time some random jerk on the Internet challenges it. Not that we don't do that now and then; I know I've written quite a few comments here arguing against transphobic nonsense in detail, but usually it's in response to specific claims. It's not like the OP here has given any reasons why trans people aren't "valid", so I don't see anything of substance really to take on. And, as I've never heard a transphobic argument that could stand up to any real scrutiny, I think the OP's wrongness ought to be the default position, unless she's gonna try a real argument.