The Chosen Tribe of God, the Hebrew family of Jacob (Known as Israel afterwards) were all Caucasian, white people. The “Jews” who say they are Jews but are not, and do lie – are actually the synagogue of Satan – the Edomites (Through Jacob’s brother, Esau – A murderous Barbarian) mixed with the Demonic Nephilim remnants of the giants. Hebrews are Caucasian. Today they are known as Christians. Gentiles are non-believing Hebrews.
What are you basing any of this on?
- Is Esau actually characterised as a “murderous barbarian”? I’m pretty sure he actually is just a dumb, gullible Manly Man, in contrast to cunning trickster Mommy’s Boy Jacob. And no, I do not think expressing extreme anger when he realises how much his brother had tricked him qualifies him as onne.
- Jacob hangs out around the tent rather than going out hunting like his brother, extorts Esau into selling him his birthright for food and impersonates Esau to trick his blind father into giving him the blessing intended for his brother. That would fit in perfectly with the way you people think about Jews, so why do you want to claim him as your ancestor rather than theirs?
- Esau is described as red-haired. As far as I know, that makes him the only Biblical character with hints towards being North European.
- The patriarchs of the Israelites amd the Edomites were portrayed as brothers, meaning that - despite hostilities - a kinship between the two peoples was recognised. Also, the Edomites were the direct southern neighbours of the Isrealites- What the hell makes you assume that the Judaeans were a different race from the Edomites (and the other surrounding peoples also considered kin)?
The word ‘Jew’ replaced the words, Judah, Judahite, and Judaean.
It’S almost as if polities, ethnicities and languages shift over times and more atchaic versions of a word are sometimes used to differentiate between a group before and after a significant historical change (here, the Jewish Diaspora since the destruction of the Second Temple)…
Jews are not Israelites, they are Edomites.
In the New Testament, you must understand the context to understand who is Judah and who is Jew. Since the land of Judah and the land of Idumea were merged into the land then called Judaea in the first century BC, a Judaean could then be an Israelite of the house of Judah, or an Edomite Jew of the house of Esau from Idumea.
This word ‘Jew’ is not a mistake, it is a deliberate tampering of scripture. The result is that the world and the ‘churches’ believe the Jews are Israelites, which they are not.
Okay, how do we go from “the Edomites eventually were able to re-establish a small country of their own during the Classical era, but were ultimately conquered, converted and assimilated by the Hasmoneans” to “some citizens of Judaea were ethnic Edomites, therefore, modern Jews are all Edomites who have just been pretending to be the descendants of the Judaeans for two thwousand years”?
Also, why do you not seem to assign significance to the linguistic shift from “Edom” to “Idumea” like you do with Jews and Judeans?
The Hebrew word for Judah, which is Yahudah, was replaced in the 18th century with the word ‘Jew’. This happened as a result of over 14 centuries with the variations of the Latin word ioudaeus.
So, after over a millenium, a word that was already inherited by a foreign language’s rendering of the demonym, used for a different looks quite a bit different than the original. So what? And more importantly, what does it have to do with the Edomites usurping the identity of the Israelites?
PS:
[Migrated to Europe as Celts, Goths, Saxons, Irish, Scots, Danes, etc.
Do you have any trace of evidence, linguistic, archaeological, cultural or genetic, that North Europeans are not actually descended from the people already living there - speaking their own languages with a plausible relationship with those of their neighbours, but unrelated to the languages of the Bible, and with distinctive genetic traits like light eyes and hair and the retention of lactose tolerance into adulthood that clearly dispersed from origins around Jütland - but people from one tiny, far-away country that were forcibly resettled and dispersed by their conquerers, far away, in a time and region where the historical accounts are too extensive for such an event to go unnoted (compare, for instance, the migration of Iranians into southern Inner Asia snd North India).