fschmidt

fschmidt #fundie love-shy.com

Women are not men with a different shape. Women are different from men. They don't think like us at all. We men have more in common with male chimpanzees than we do with women. Women cannot conceive original ideas, aren't capable of independent thought, are not self-aware, and have no sense of fairness. This isn't to say that women can't be good. Women can be good, but in a different way from men. Women are good when they are guided to form the right emotional connections. And this happens when men form a society that causes this to happen. Of course this can't happen in societies where women vote. If you feel a strong compulsion for equality, I suggest you redirect it to other male primates. I would much rather have male chimps vote than women.

fschmidt #fundie reddit.com

The idea that human evolution has stopped is nonsense. When survival isn't a factor, evolution is driven by reproduction rates. And since culture actually shapes the most important aspects of our environment, it is culture that drives evolution with different cultures driving human evolution in different directions. Modern liberal feminist culture causes people to evolve towards being evil morons. Monogamous cultures with enough scarcity of resources to make survival an issue tend to evolve towards intelligence and morality. I wrote in detail about these topics here:

http://www.mikraite.org/Human-Evolution-tp17.html

The way to implement natural eugenics is through religion where the religious requirements select for positive evolution.

Various incels #sexist reddit.com

(the_worst_93)
A normie life is a sad life.

I'm glad I'm not a normie. What is a normie life? A life of constantly putting others down to make your self feel better. They do this by showing off their lives on social media, trying to make others feel bad and make themselves feel great. They live by this motto, "when you are weak I am strong".

Normies spend years of their lives going to parties, drinking till they puke all over them selves, and they mock their own friends and have no loyalty. If a normie gets a chance to hang out with some one who has higher status, you can bet that the normie will ditch their best friend for a higher status person. In general normies are heartless, fake, vapid saps.

(send_me_them_tits_ )
Without doubt. While there are some normies who seem to have meaningful relationships, most of it is status-seeking bullshit that I wouldn't want to be a part of even if I could. Sometimes I imagine being a Chad or normie, Chad's don't have to worry about being cutthroat quite as much, but what if you're on the lower end of Chads? All your buddies are taller/more attractive and you end up looking like a fuck, among your social group of attractive people.

(universallyabhorred)
Normies get some poon but at what cost? Their humanity.

(fschmidt)
This is modern culture. Seek an alternative.

(yamayamahahahaha)
I feel as though I lead a Normie lifestyle while being a secret incel. And yeah it pretty much feels like that sometimes. M

(universallyabhorred)
Normies try and lose, while we give up and accept reality.

fschmidt #dunning-kruger reddit.com

For many years I had a fantasy about forming a sane community. The fantasy was to gather the sane remnant from this insane world and form a community for reasonable people. This was partly inspired by the concept of the remnant of the Israelites in the Old Testament after the fall of Israel and Judah. But this idea has a fatal flaw. There is no remnant. Humanity has become pure trash, there are no reasonable people left.

The Old Testament talks about such a time in the story of Noah. Clearly most of humanity needs to be wiped out. We have another example of this in the fall of Rome. If you read original source material from decaying Rome, you will see that these people were complete morons at a similar level to the morons of today. In The Antony Option I described the "good" people as those covered in Early Christian Lives who left Roman society to live in the desert. But from this book it is clear that these people were also complete morons. They had no interest in intelligence or quality or anything of real value. They just wanted to get close to God and hoped that this would give them supernatural powers. Eventually monasteries formed and some people moved near them. This had a slight beneficial effect in removing these people from dysgenic Roman culture. But the reality is that it took 1000 years and huge population drops before these people could escape the idiocracy caused by the decay of Rome.

I see no significant difference between the decay of Rome and the decay of modern culture other than that modern culture is almost universal. When Rome fell and Europe became a pure idiocracy, at least the Arabs, guided by Islam, were able to produce a civilized culture. But the fall of modern culture is producing a worldwide idiocracy that would take at least another 1000 years to escape from, if ever.

I view the traditional Anabaptists as the best group today. But they are not good enough. Besides the obvious problem of their pacifism, they are not eugenic enough to produce real intelligence. But even with these faults, it would impossible to form anything like traditional Anabaptist communities from any other population today. The conservative Mennonite groups were fully formed by the end of the 1950s, a time before today's idiocracy. Today people are just too stupid and undisciplined to form any kind of real community. This applies to all people of all races and all religions, all are just worthless.

Even trying to form any kind of informal group around some sense of quality is hopeless. My /r/GoodSoftware was an attempt to do this for good software, and it clearly failed. No one cares about quality in today's decayed idiocracy.

Having described the current bleak situation, I will propose a solution. The solution must be intrinsically eugenic since the best that one can hope for is to produce reasonable people in another 200 years. The current population must essentially be viewed as subhuman mammals with the potential to once again evolve into full humans. So the question is how can one breed such mammals in a positive way.

While humans have lost all intelligence and all sense of quality, there still remains a range in human reproductive strategy based on r/K selection. So what needs to be done is to form an informal community of human K-strategists where people can cooperate in raising their children. Such a community would naturally select strongly for K-strategy genes. When modern culture inevitably collapses and strong survival pressure reasserts itself, this survival pressure applied to a K-selected community would produce rapid evolutionary advancement.

Now I will describe how to do this. I would have an informal organization called something like "raising good children". It is critical that this organization have no rules and membership. This prevents it from being hijacked and taken in another direction. Anyone who wants to participate can, but the nature of such a group would only appeal to K-strategists. We would focus on things like improving education and health of children in the group, and in passing the religion of the parents to the children.

Who would I target for such a group. The obvious choice is Muslims. While Muslims are generally stupid (like everyone else) and undisciplined, at least they understand that modern culture is a threat to their children. And they understand that the modern world is a mess. They are too lazy to do much to fix this, but they would support in principle something that could improve the situation for their children. What I am describing here is based on my experience at my local mosque.

But there still remains a problem of motivation. The group should be willing to take real action of at least a basic kind to actually produce better children. The goal is to first improve the culture by actually raising better children, and then wait for selection pressure to improve the genetics. This should mean that each generation should be better than the one that came before it, reversing the current trend. So for example, parents should get rid of their televisions. But Muslims are extremely unmotivated to take action of any kind.

My solution to this is to get Muslims to visit conservative Mennonite churches. Most Muslims view things as basically hopeless, and a visit to a Mennonite church should cure this. Again I know this from experience, from taking the leader of my local mosque a Mennonite church. He was very impressed and was motivated for a while to try to follow the Mennonite example. But the problem is that the closest Mennonite church is too far away for easy trips. So I want to move where Muslims and Mennonites live close together, and I am looking into Harrisburg, PA for this. My hope is that when Muslims see how Mennonites successfully raise children outside of modern culture, and how Mennonites keep their religion across generations, Muslims will be motivated to follow this example.

But unlike Mennonites, I don't want to form a religious community. Islam has a lot of baggage that Muslims won't be able to fix until their IQ goes up by 20 points. So the solution is to make the "raising good children" organization clearly not religious and open to people of any religion. But I can't see anyone other than Muslims actually being interested in such an organization because no other religion recognizes the problems of modern culture.

If such an organization can be formed, I would hope that children raised in the organization would remain as adults. Naturally many wouldn't, many would leave. And this is good because this process would purify the K-strategy genes in the community.

For me personally, the next steps are visiting Harrisburg, PA often so I can judge it, and developing at least something of value for children to serve as a starting point. For this, I plan to add a 2D game API to Luan and use that to offer a programming class for children.

I have discussed this idea with my main contact at my local mosque, and he is supportive of this idea. I will visit Harrisburg, PA for a week later this month and hopefully learn enough to decide if this works as a location.

fschmidt #psycho reddit.com

As much as I hate Trump, I think a Trump dictatorship would be the best possible outcome for the elections. This would put Trump in a position to mercilessly crush the Left. And this could pave the way for a peaceful splitting up of America when Trump steps down.

fschmidt #fundie reddit.com

[Comment under "Why not suicide?"]

If we are going to discuss abstract, open-ended questions, then I will give an abstract, open-ended answer. And that is, far better to take many normie scum with you than to just die alone. Of course I am just speaking abstractly and theoretically. But somehow I don't think reddit is really interested in the difference between the abstract and the concrete, so I suggest that this entire thread simply be deleted.

fschmidt #fundie reddit.com

The solution is simple. Modern culture should be completely destroyed as were the Moabites in the Bible. All men and all non-virgin women of modern culture should be exterminated.

fschmidt and finalformcel #sexist reddit.com

(comments on "Femoids do not even think or have brains at all."

(Board_Gaming)
Except the women who think about programming and investing.

(fschmidt)
Based on my experience as a programmer, women are about as good at programming as men are at breast feeding.

(Board_Gaming)
I guess you don't know any good women programmers.

(fschmidt)
Correct

(sauceyboi420)
https://www.biography.com/people/grace-hopper-21406809

(finalformcel)
I bet she spent most of military time getting passed around all the milichads

(sauceyboi420)
maybe so, but she was still an amazing programmer

(finalformcel)
Doubtful

(sauceyboi420)
how is it doubtful when theirs evidence right in front of you?

(finalformcel)
Normie propaganda

fschmidt #fundie coalpha.org

[Hyperlinks in original]

The big news this week is that two Islamist gunmen killed twelve people at the French "satirical" weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo. The world is almost universally outraged by this attack. But not me.

What exactly is Charlie Hebdo? It's in French and I don't read French, but I think a google image search conveys the basic idea.

http://www.google.com/search?q=Charlie+Hebdo&tbm=isch

From this, we see that "satire" is really just a polite way of saying ridicule. This is a liberal newspaper that ridicules religion and whatever else liberals don't approve of. We can see a similar style of cartoon by googling "nazi jewish cartoons".

http://www.google.com/search?q=nazi+jewish+cartoons&tbm=isch

There isn't much difference except that the Nazis had somewhat better taste than Liberals do. Of course the targets are different, but that doesn't matter, the concept is the same.

Should this kind of thing be tolerated? Whatever the answer, the answer should be consistent. If you are going to tolerate Charlie Hebdo then you should also tolerate Nazi anti-Jewish cartoons. Is France consistent? Please read about Hate speech laws in France. According to these laws, this kind of thing is "hate speech" and should not be tolerated. And in fact Muslims took Charlie Hebdo to court based on this law and lost. This is liberal hypocrisy at its finest. For a liberal, hate speech is only speech against something liberals like. Hate speech against what liberals hate isn't hate speech at all, according to liberals, it is free speech.

So let us summarize what a liberal is. A liberal is a hypocrite who ridicules opposing viewpoints, who is intolerant and legally censors opposing viewpoints, who is totally closed-minded and is unwilling to even listen to opposing viewpoints, and who come out in mass protest when their hypocrisy is threatened. In short, liberals are scum. But does this justify killing them?

On an intellectual level, this is a difficult question. But on an emotional, it is easy. I am filled with joy whenever I hear that liberals have been killed. How could I possibly feel any other way? I have an opposing view to liberals, just as these Muslims do, so the liberals have relentlessly ridiculed and censored me. They are totally incapable of respecting or tolerating opposing viewpoints like mine. Every interaction I have with liberals causes me to hate them more. How could I wish for anything other than their death?

On an intellectual level, I believe in free speech and live and let live. So in theory, liberals should be allowed to be scum and should be left in peace. But this only applies as long as liberals follow the same rules. When the liberal West interferes in the internal affairs of Muslim countries, Muslims have every right to attack back. The argument that these are innocent citizens of the West is absurd. It is precisely propaganda like Charlie Hebdo that causes the public to choose governments that attack Islam. So Charlie Hebdo is a justified target. My only criticism is that while France is quite intolerant internally to Muslims, it is not particularly active against Muslim countries. So Muslims who don't like France should just leave. The same cannot be said for America which relentlessly sticks its nose into the affairs of other nations. So attacks against America are entirely justified.

I am not Muslim, so this is not my problem. So while violence against liberals appeals to me emotionally, I have no intellectual reason to do this and I won't. I will just live my life in peace, and take pleasure in any news of violence against the liberals who I hate.

fschmidt #wingnut #psycho #mammon reddit.com

Screwing over modern scum

When the Jews screwed over ethnic Europeans in the last century, it was a crime against humanity. When the Jews screw over ethnic Europeans in this century, it is a service to humanity. Why the difference? Because in the last century ethnic Europeans were good people, but in this century they have become degenerate scum.

Religions tend to extremes. Jews screw over anyone who isn't Jewish. Christians and Muslims refuse to screw over anyone. I disagree with both positions. I follow the Old Testament and my view is that one can screw over members of evil groups but not members of good groups. Are there any religions that take my position? Are there any people here who share my position?

This is a very practical question. Modern scum currently hold the vast majority of the wealth, so making money involves extracting money from modern scum. And you can't do this if you aren't willing to screw them over. This is why Jews are rich while serious Christians and Muslims are poor. So if anyone agrees with me that screwing over modern scum is a public service, then please contact me and maybe we can do business together.

(later, responding to a comment that has since been deleted)

And if you desire to profit from this, all you have to do is pretty much, offer them a way to indulge in their stupidity, some more and not offer it for free.

Actually this is my current business model. But I also have an old business based on screwing modern scum that is stuck because I can't find a marketing/sales person for it. And since I can't think of any moral reason not to screw over modern scum, I would restart this business if I found the right person.

fschmidt #fundie reddit.com

Do you hate modern software?

I hate all aspects of modern culture including modern software. Since I am a programmer, I wrote my own tools as I expained here:

/r/nonmorons/comments/copmv5/developing_solutions/

I am wondering whether there would be any interest in Luan. Unlike TempleOS, it is not a toy. I use it for commercial projects. But the philosophy behind Luan is like that of TempleOS. The problem is that as far as I can tell, all programmers are members of modern culture and are therefore scum who hate everything that is good and would therefore hate Luan in which case there is no reason for me to work on making it usable for others. But if some programmers are not scum, then of course they would hate modern software and then I would have a reason to develop Luan for them. So please let me know if you hate modern software.

fschmidt #fundie #conspiracy reddit.com

Why I hate Judaism

I hate Judaism because Judaism caused the Holocaust in which most of my family died. To be fair, I assign about 90% of the blame to Judaism and about 10% of the blame to the Nazis.

Judaism is based on the Talmud which basically teaches Jews to screw over the goyim for the benefit of Jews. This is a short-sighted strategy because occasionally the goyim rise up and attack Jews as a result. This is what happened in Germany.

Germany was the most tolerant nation in Europe of Jews. So how did Judaism respond. By promoting moral degeneracy and financial corruption in the Weimar Republic. Jews controlled the central bank and the ministry of finance in the Weimar Republic. They supported corrupt jewish bankers and the general financial rape of the German economy. All financial problems were handled by printing more money. (Sound familiar?) This resulted in hyperinflation and extreme poverty for the German people. This is what led to the rise of the Nazis to power.

But the Nazis made a serious mistake in blaming the jewish race for the problems. The blame should have been placed Judaism, not all Jews. Judaism is the cause of all this evil. My family was secular and had nothing to do with the evils of Judaism. Not only were innocent Jews harmed by the Holocaust, but the Nazis lost the war as a result. It was mainly secular Jews who invented the atomic bomb. If the Nazis had banned Judaism and welcomed Jews who reject Judaism, then they would have had the atomic bomb and would have won the war, and could have saved the West from liberal degeneracy.

Of course Judaism learned the wrong lesson from the Holocaust. Instead of learning to stop screwing over the goyim, their strategy is just to oppress the opposition even more harshly. They hate free speech and spread corruption. This will only work until the next hyperinflation which could well lead to another Holocaust, following the same pattern as in the past.

Here are some resources:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50555.htm

https://www.amazon.com/Jewish-History-Religion-Thousand-Political-ebook/dp/B00GGOEL4A/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSy6ENVAJlY

Sans_Logique #sexist #crackpot #psycho reddit.com

(hydrolythe)
Inceldom is lame.

That's because it's built upon a sociological theory that can easily be proven false by basic psychology. (If all women wanted to sleep with chads, then why is hybristophilia a mental disorder?) At least Aristotle appealed to the essence of men and women when defending patriarchy. This is a notion many still uphold today.

If a man from Ancient Greece has a better theory than you for explaining things you have a resounding failure of a theory in your hands.

(https://www.reddit.com/r/incelconversations/comments/as3rch/inceldom_is_lame/)
Your post is extremely poorly thought out. I'd call you an idiot but it would be an insult to all the idiots.

That's because it's built upon a sociological theory that can easily be proven false by basic psychology. (If all women wanted to sleep with chads, then why is hybristophilia a mental disorder?)

Because the term/concept were developed at a time when feminism hasn't yet completely mutilated Western societies.

]At least Aristotle appealed to the essence of men and women when defending patriarchy. This is a notion many still uphold today. If a man from Ancient Greece has a better theory than you for explaining things you have a resounding failure of a theory in your hands.

What does any of this have to do with anything you state before ? Also, you almost certainly don't even know what specific theories fschmidt has and incels have vastly different theories on what causes their problem. You just lump it all together and you don't even explain what Aristotle was saying and why his ideas are better than... whose ideas exactly?

Fucking lunatic.

(hydrolythe)

Because the term/concept were developed at a time when feminism hasn't yet completely mutilated Western societies.

Ah yes, the "feminism mutilates". If you think that writing "women are equal to men" in the constitution is a form of mutilation you have explained what's wrong with you indeed.

What does any of this have to do with anything you state before ?

If a misogynist from more than 2000 years ago has a better theory for justifying misogyny than you do you know you have a massive failure of a theory on your hands.[quoe]You just lump it all together and you don't even explain what Aristotle was saying and why his ideas are better than... whose ideas exactly?

Indeed. I've yet to see a theory incels have for their suffering other than the blackpill. The fact that you think incels are a diverse group of people when in actuality they force eachother into one rigid streamlined thought where any diversion has to be eliminated shows an incredible lack of awareness. And I don't care if liberals have another theory for their suffering. I care what they themselves actually think.

And in case you haven't noticed. Aristotle was much better (although still wrong) than incels ever will be.

(Sans_Logique)

If you think that writing "women are equal to men" in the constitution is a form of mutilation you have explained what's wrong with you indeed.

Anybody can write down whatever they want. I can write down that "men can fly and women have 7 breasts" and nothing will happen. But when I try to live by such nonsense is where problems happen in society. Men and women are not equal and trying to live by that lie kills a society pretty quickly.

I don't know what's "wrong" with me and I don't think it's up to you to tell me, given that you don't know anything about me or Aristotle or incels or whatever the fuck you ramble about,

You also did nothing to address my point, which is that hybristophilia was rare and thus a disorder before feminist plague wiped out any intelligence and morality. Today's Western women are very attracted to violent, immoral men and putting a bullet through a woman's brain will attract other women much more than any honesty, decency or morality. Raping and executing a woman is attractive to women in feminist societies much more than being intelligent or decent can ever be - being anything more than scum repels modern Western women

If a misogynist from more than 2000 years... something about theories

Aristotle wasn't a misogynist. Judging by your insanity anybody before 150 years ago or so would be a misogynist in this case. Nobody who lived before that time would even think of something as retarded as giving women the vote or believing that they were equal to men. His theory (which I am not familiar with and you don't bother to explain it) wasn't to "justify" anything but came out of his own pondering. You can't apply 2019 idiocy to a man who lived in 4th century BC.

Indeed.

Indeed what? Do you even know what you're replying to?

I've yet to see a theory incels have for their suffering other than the blackpill.

Umm, really? I don't know how you define the term "blackpill" at all but there are several explainations to why incel happens in a society that don't claim looks are a cause. Read

http://www.mikraite.org/Human-Evolution-td17.html

https://caamib.wordpress.com/the-story-of-your-incel-an-inconvenient-truth/

shows an incredible lack of awareness

Actually, you are the one with the incredible lack of awareness, equating the term that has existed since 1997 and that many people define and see differently with a stupid sub culture that appeared in 2016. If you actually read https://caamib.wordpress.com/2018/06/05/dissecting-the-disaster-how-the-term-incel-got-taken-over-by-the-worst-people-and-what-to-do-about-it/ you'd see that this all started when a bunch of morons from sites like Lookism and Sluthate overtook the term after Caamib was banned from Reddit. His way of running things was different and focused on rape, low ages of consent, Islam and positive thinking. You could have investigated and read about older incel forums, like Love-shy.com or the now defunct Incel Support to see what they're about. Instead you just blather like an idiot.

I care what they themselves actually think.

Yet you never bothered to research it at all and are showing breathtaking ignorance.

Your last sentence is also breathtakingly ignorant as we have already established that no one man can be better at anything than a very disparate group under a very disparate term.

Do I need to repeat myself? I'd call you an idiot but it would be an insult to all the idiots.

Next page