new

Christ detained by Satan 6 centuries prior being Jesus?!

I wonder why nobody wants to address the detention of Christ with the 'king of Persia'?

Read this first (short masterpiece reading):

Thread: BOMBSHELL: Christ was on earth before being Jesus!

Dan 10:13

But the prince of the Persian kingdom resisted me twenty-one days. Then Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, because I was detained there with the king of Persia.

Christ was detained WITH the 'king of Persia', together, as stated in Dan 10:13.

Except that history never reported such detention of the king of Persia which was Cyrus the Great at the moment Christ met Daniel.

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Why did the prince of the Persian kingdom resist Christ 21 days?

What could the word 'resist' means?

Who was the prince of the Persian kingdom at the time of Cyrus?

The son of Cyrus the Great was Cambyses II.

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Bardiya is said to be an imposter who ruled few months.

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

20 So he said, “Do you know why I have come to you? Soon I will return to fight against the prince of Persia, and when I go, the prince of Greece will come;

This is not the king but the prince of Persia that Christ would fight against.

Why would Christ fight Cambyses II in the End Times supposedly being the moment Christ returns to defeat Satan.

Who else could Christ fight against?

Is the Son of God involved in minor fights against minor princes?

There is another version that could well be the real one.

Nebbuchadnezzar was the king of Babylon who invaded Israel and subdued its king who was deported to Babylon. Daniel was a noble from the royal Israelite family. He wrote his book from Babylon in captivity. He cites Nebbuchadnezzar and Belshazzar, son of Nabonidus.

In Daniel's book, some kings are missing between Nebbuchadnezzar/Belshazzar of Babylon and Cyrus the Great, then Darius I, of Persia. These missing kings are:

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Amel-Marduk
Nergal-shar-usur
Labashi-Marduk

and Nabonidus, particularly known with the Nabonidus Chronicle.

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Nabonidus was king and father of Belshazzar cited by Daniel in Dan 8 as king of Babylon, instead of his father Nabonidus!

Why is Nabonidus forgotten?

While the three first kings after Nebbuchadnezzar (42 years of reign) ruled only for 4 years (3 kings in four years), Nabonidus, having left the capital for a long period, ruled
17 years through his son Belshazzar, staying in Babylon, for a while.

Wikipedia says about Nabonidus: Last Mesopotamian king of Babylon, originated in Harran in Assyria. Was not a Chaldean, often left rule to his son Belshazzar.

So, remember that Nabonidus was the last king of Babylon before the invasion of the Persian king Cyrus the Great while Daniel was in captivity in Babylon.

In the page of Wikipedia about Cyrus we can read this:

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

It is probable that Cyrus engaged in negotiations with the Babylonian generals to obtain a compromise on their part and therefore avoid an armed confrontation. Nabonidus was staying in the city at the time and soon fled to the capital, Babylon, which he had not visited in years.[62]

Two days later, on October 7 (proleptic Gregorian calendar), Gubaru's troops entered Babylon, again without any resistance from the Babylonian armies, and detained Nabonidus.

Here is more about Nabonidus:

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

HERE WE ARE!

WE HAVE A KING DETAINED IN CYRUS' PERIOD. IT HAPPENS THAT CYRUS WAS MADE KING OF BABYLON AFTER NABONIDUS' REIGN!

On October 29, Cyrus himself entered the city of Babylon and detained Nabonidus.
.../...

After taking Babylon, Cyrus the Great proclaimed himself "king of Babylon, king of Sumer and Akkad, king of the four corners of the world" in the famous Cyrus cylinder, an inscription deposited in the foundations of the Esagila temple dedicated to the chief Babylonian god, Marduk.

What the links provided say is that Nabonidus has been downplayed by the Babylonians priests of Marduk and Cyrus himself, considered as a Messiah in Isaiah's texts by the Jews.

NABONIDUS HAS UNDERGONE A SMEAR PROPAGANDA BY THE ONE SEEN AS A MESSIAH BY THE JEWS.

IS IT THE REASON FOR THE CONFUSION BETWEEN THE PRINCE OF PERSIA - IN FACT CYRUS THE GREAT NOT KING OF BABYLON YET - AND THE KING OF 'PERSIA' WHO WOULD BE IN FACT THE KING OF BABYLON - INSTEAD OF PERSIA - DETAINED BY CYRUS...WITH CHRIST?

THIS GIVES US A VERY NEW VISION OF CHRIST DETAINED WITH NABONIDUS, KING OF BABYLON (NOT PERSIA) BY CYRUS - THE PRINCE OF PERSIA - WHO THEN IS IN FACT SATAN INCARNATED...REVERED BY THE JEWS FOR HIS DECISION TO SET THE JEWS FREE!

The point now to understand is why the Jews mistranslated Babylon for Persia. Is it to follow orders from Cyrus the Great to better hide the presence of Christ with Nabonidus in prison because of Cyrus WHO WOULD BE THE PRINCE OF PERSIA WHOM CHRIST WILL FIGHT AT THE END TIMES AND RESISTED CHRIST 21 DAYS?

ONLY A SUPERNATURAL BEING COULD RESIST CHRIST'S POWER. THIS COULD ONLY BE CHRIST, UNFORTUNATELY DETAINED WITH NABONIDUS!

In case I wasn't clear enough, the point is that:

1) the Prince of Persia was Cyrus the Great, KING OF PERSIA. He resisted Christ for 21 days. Cyrus the Great was actually Satan that Christ must fight in the End Times.

2) the King of Persia was Nabonidus, actually KING OF BABYLON. He was actually detained by Cyrus the Great just before the latter become King of Babylon. The detention with a king that Christ speaks about is therefore REAL.

3) The mistranslations - king of Persia instead of King of Babylon (Nabonidus) as well as Prince of Persia instead of King of Persia (Cyrus the Great) - reflects a purposedly smear campaign against Nabonidus by Cyrus the Great seen as Messiah by the Jews through Isaiah's words, to better confuse the readers and make Nabonidus forgotten.

4) Since Christ was detained by Cyrus the Great WITH Nabonidus, King of Babylon, it means that Christ was incarnated BEFORE being Jesus for the detention necessarily occured on the physical plane!

5) the point 4 above explains why the angel Michael had to set Christ free. Christ should have been abducted by an angel - only supporter of Christ at that time according to his own words - and freed from his incarnated body (Daniel saw him in his glorious body in Dan 10) like Christ was freed from Jesus' body when John saw Christ in Rev 1.

6) the abduction of Christ should have occured like the ones reported in numerous cases of angels' interventions as stated in this thread:

Thread: The RAPTURE is UFO related.

7) Christ's incarnation in Daniel's time remains a mystery...but should be related to Nabonidus' detention. Who was Christ (incarnated) to the King of Babylon? One clue lies in the mysterious and supernatural handwriting on the wall in Dan 5 intended to Belshazzar, Nabonidus' son:

25 “This is the inscription that was written:

mene, mene, tekel, parsin

26 “Here is what these words mean:

Mene: God has numbered the days of your reign and brought it to an end.

27 Tekel: You have been weighed on the scales and found wanting.

28 Peres: Your kingdom is divided and given to the Medes and Persians.”

30 That very night Belshazzar, king of the Babylonians, was slain,

31 and Darius the Mede took over the kingdom, at the age of sixty-two.

Here we see how historically wrong is this last verse for the new king of Babylon was Cyrus, NOT Darius who came well after Cyrus the Great almost ten years later after two other kings.

The same way, Belshazzar is presented as the son of Nebbuchadnezzar instead of Nabonidus in Dan 5.

Again an attempt to dismiss Nabonidus and confuse the readers.

I believe Christ being close to Nabonidus who was far from his son. One must ask why...

DEAD MEAT REVELATION---> Space Weapon Attack on Tianjian, China---> NO WAREHOUSE AT EPICENTER OF TIANJIAN EXPLOSION

After carefully poring over the images, it is now obvious that the actual epicenter of the explosion was nowhere near ANY WAREHOUSE AT ALL, and in fact happened across property owned by more than one shipping company. Ruihai was supposed to be blamed for this, but it is obvious at this point that they were not responsible for the blast. Now I really think it was a kinetic weapon that did this, because the big crater happened in the middle of nowhere at all, and targeting is probably very difficult to get perfect with that type of weapon. One thing is certain, this surely was NOT a warehouse blast, the closest warehouse was approximately 100 yards away.

The explosion was actually closest to their security gate and whatever other shipping companies surrounded Ruihai. The explosion was so massive that many many buildings have completely vanished, including all warehouses and storage areas owned by Ruihai and surrounding shipping companies, with only a concrete office building remaining (1 of 2). All others are completely gone without a trace. Selective deletion of buildings (based on what they are made of) is a hallmark indicator of a nuclear weapons type blast, and if this was a kinetic weapon, results are similar.

One thing is made obvious by the very up to date "before" image: there was nothing at the epicenter that could have exploded, something other than chemicals did this. And the scale of the blast proves it was definitely a multiple kiloton range blast, achievable ONLY BY A SUPER POWER NATION.

Now the only thing up to speculation is exactly why a superpower attacked China. Was it the currency devaluation? Hillary's espionage story in need of burial? You guess, at this point it is irrelevant, an attack is proven.

BLOCKBUSTER: LATEST IMAGES SHOW THE BLAST PRODUCED A THREE ACRE LAKE! The new lake in China proves a 5kiloton blast, possibly nuclear or possibly from a space based "rod from God" (pictured to the left) weapon DEPLOYED BY THE SPACE PLANE, DING DING DING DING DING!.

At first I doubted the "rod from God" because I have no explanation for how one could drop out of orbit and actually fall, but evidently this system is real and they solved that problem. That would make the rod from God the prime candidate here, because the Chinese could easily trace down a nuclear blast.

UPDATE: ANOTHER BLOCKBUSTER: Blasts were NOT RELATED, blast 1, the small blast, happened on the West side of the container lot, and was the crater everyone first saw with containers laying in it, thinking that was from the big blast. It was not. Blast 2, the lake making nuke type blast, happened on the East side of the container lot. The fire happened to the South of both blasts, approximately centered between them, and was ONLY A FIRE, there is no conceivable way it could produce blasts on both sides of a container lot, separated by over 200 yards. The materials in question simply could not do it. The warehouse that was supposedly holding whatever exploded was erased by the large (rod from God or nuclear) blast, as was everything else around that blast.

[link to www.popsci.com]

The crater pictures people posted previously were from the small blast, not the big one, a new picture which clearly shows where the big blast went off just got released by China. After looking through the images of the soviet nuclear tests, the new lake in China appears to have been made by a slightly sub surface burst of at least a 5 kiloton nuclear bomb. There is no way the earthquake from this was in the 2's. Take a look at the pond made by a test of a small nuclear weapon ground burst in Russia and compare it to that new lake in China, which is many times as big as the pond made by a nuclear test in Russia!

Now we have limited options for this blast, since nothing stored there could have possibly done this.
This was NOT an accident and the fracture pattern around the crater proves a sub ground burst. If it was a sub ground burst,then a small nuclear weapon is a possibility because once a nuke has to push dirt, the blinding flash will not happen. A slightly subsurface detonation would explain why camera sensors did not get strange artifacts. And if it was not a nuke, it was something else incredibly huge, the fracture patterns around the crater (now a lake) also support a meteor type impact, (rod from God) but not a fuel air bomb because fuel air bombs will not leave craters.

A little bit more of a detailed explanation: If the blast happened at ground level, almost all of the energy would go upwards and the blast would not have made a large deep crater, especially one large enough and deep enough to make that lake. If you look to the right hand side of the lake, you can see fracture patterns in the earth, which were caused by the earth being compressed sideways and not downwards. This would only be done with a sub surface blast. After the blast, the earth bounced back towards the center of the lake, which opened up the cracks.
Look closely at the ground around the lake. Those who claimed it was not a nuke cited the fact that if it was, everything around the crater would be vaporized and wiped clean. Now that we have the real crater pic from the big blast, YEP, it matches that perfectly. Take a look at the containers laying in the lower left corner of this picture - they have no paint or color, which means they had the surfaces incinerated by intense heat only a nuke or other super weapon would reach. If this was a carbide blast, they would be black or have their original colors to some degree, complete color change to only gray proves this explosion was FREAKING HOT.

That type and size of blast crater will only happen if a massive bomb goes off a few feet underground, such as a tactical nuke in a drain pipe which leaves scant few alternative options (see Rod from God), No chemical blast did that, PERIOD. The building that is still standing in the upper right hand side of the frame is a typical example of what is left after a nuclear test, concrete buildings seldom get leveled, but they do get gutted by nuclear blasts. Just look through pictures of the soviet nuclear tests and you will see this. Bottom line? The aftermath is completely consistent with a nuclear blast.
I think a glue fire was started as an excuse for this huge blast, which came considerably later. And who knows what made the first big blast, or smaller blasts that led up to it, but I am confident it was a show and not an accident. They wanted this filmed from all angles and set up the show to make sure people would be recording when the big one went off. If there were lots of little blasts before that, why was there not a single small blast after the big one? That is when I would think the small blasts should have started if this entire scenario was not contrived from the start.

What would be the motive for this attack? I don't buy the currency devaluation, but something else very tasty was going on that a distraction was needed for, SUCH AS:
You cannot "professionally wipe" a server and then hand it to ANY American intelligence agency, Hillary is BUSTED

The only way you can secure a hard drive that is actually in the hands of the NSA is to either incinerate it or shred it down to dust. It won't matter if you use Norton Clean Sweep or some other app to purge it, even if a full write was done to the entire drive several times, enough stray magnetic data remains from past writes for the NSA to do a deep analysis of and extract - with errors, but they will at least know what is there, and THIS IS WHY THEY KNOW:

Hillary: THE ISSUE IS NOT THE E-MAILS, THE ISSUE IS THE FACT SHE HAD COUNTLESS SPOOKS INSIDE THE NSA FEEDING DATA STRAIGHT TO THE ENEMY. The mail box is just a diversion from this core fact!

The tribe controlled MSM is trying to pawn off the worst proven case of espionage in America's history as a "mishandled mail box!" The fact the NSA never found that mail box before Hillary gutted the nation also proves that spooks inside that organization covered it all up!

In case you did not know: To shut Trump up, they called him to jury duty and the trial will probably be stretched until after the election. That is how corruption functions, there is no legitimate election process in America.

The message window has not changed since the Hillary espionage story because that was the cutoff, incoming messages have been blocked. I have tried to resolve this but know the answer already: The espionage/China blast stories are so on the mark that they have to stop the message stream because they don't want any whistleblowers getting through with worse stuff. AND NOW THEY ARE (probably) HAARPING UP A VOLCANO IN JAPAN FOR THE PUNCH LINE.