The root of the incel problem is that you hate all women for your own refusal to take responsibility for your own life.
Planned children and birth control? You want more unwanted children, a larger welfare state, higher taxes?
In CHINA you might rarely see an girl as only child. But in western countries, many want BOTH sons AND daughters, as there is no stigma, no dowry, no downside to having daughters compared with having sons.
You, humble? AS IF!
Hypergamy doesn’t exist in the west either, it’s mostly common with arranged marriages, in societies where the man provides for the woman. In most western countries, women provide for themselves and work as much as men do, if not more.
Imbalance? You don’t like that there are 51 percent women and 49 percent men?
Yes, incels would exist as there is a very slight excess of young women.
Why are more boys born in good times?
More boys are BORN, more girls reach adulthood, and even more women reach old age.
“Incels” might hate daughters, normal people don’t. Women don’t really hate each other, we are conditioned to compete with each other because there has traditionally only been space for ONE woman at a time. When the board rooms, the panels, the juries, etc, had one woman, they all said “well, now we have a woman, we can go back to hiring only men. The constant and longstanding pro-male affirmative action is the problem here. Nowadays, this is getting better and better, more people are hired on merits rather than “having-a-dong”, and there are all-female groups (but this is still pointed out; what if we pointed out every time it was all-male?).
Most men don’t hate women they can’t fuck, I hope. As most men have about 4-9 sexual partners, that would be ALMOST ALL WOMEN IN THE WORLD. Most men are in steady relationships with one woman, and seem fine with this.
I knew a family when I was little that had five daughters.
A colleague has two daughters, and he wanted another child, but his wife couldn’t handle another pregnancy, and he’d rather have a living healthy wife than a son.
Another colleague has two older daughters and a younger son.
Not to mention my parents-in-law: father-in-law is the youngest of 7 siblings, 5 older girls and two younger sons. Mother-in-law is second after an older brother, and they have two younger sisters.
I’m the oldest, then came a sister, then came a brother and then another brother. My parents love children, they are (or were before they retired) teachers for future kindergarten-teachers. They don’t care one iota about the gender, they see us as individuals; I’m ME, not A GIRL. Lots of people thought that my parents longed for a son, and even said “How wonderful! FINALLY you have a son!” when my first brother was born, but my parents said “It’s a healthy child, that’s all we wished for”. They wanted 16 grandchildren, but they have five, three girls and two boys. It’s two older brothers and two younger sisters, and one only girl child.
Only “incels” think in terms of “chad holes”. The rest of us think about human beings.
What extra burden is there of raising a daughter? I’d say it’s less of a burden, as girls seem to be helping with household chores at an earlier age, they do better in school, they are less violent. Boys have more learning disabilities (dyslexia, etc), and get in more fights at school.
Two daughters is the most a MAN can take? What do you mean “take”? It’s the woman that is pregnant, she has final say, unless they want to adopt, of course.
You’d be happy to raise 20 sons? Lots of twins, and triplets? Or are you going to change diapers and have wake-nights for some 25-35 years straight? Breastfeeding reduces the chance of becoming pregnant, so most siblings are at least two years apart, so 20 sons might even take 40 years, if you have them all with the same woman, of course...