"But the larger problem with disproving evolution is twofold. First, it’s (sic) definition is so plastic that there really is no meaningful set of conditions that evolutionists would accept as falsifying it, in part because, like faith in the Bible, it is assumed true, and those defending it just look for harmonizations of the data, never considering falsification."
Such hilarious stupidity from the same dumbasses who keep insisting evolution "requires" organs to evolve in isolation and flop around until they find a body, or that an individual can suddenly "decide" to grow wings or gills.