Ajani #fundie rr-bb.com
Even the largest dinosaurs would have fit on the ark as babies, and yes, I think that reference to 'dragons' in ancient times was a direct reference to what we call dinosaurs today. I even believe that some still exist today.
Even the largest dinosaurs would have fit on the ark as babies, and yes, I think that reference to 'dragons' in ancient times was a direct reference to what we call dinosaurs today. I even believe that some still exist today.
Look at what you just said. You belive He was killed 30 AD? Ok, look at this, the BC means before Christ and the AD means after death. So, apparently there had to be a Christ who died for us.
Now [if evolution was true] shouldn't the carp be closest to the turtle, since the turtle is an amphibian? But it isn't, in fact, it is barely similar at all to the turtle.
Sorry, the evidence agrees with the flood. The fact that you ignore it and continue to make the claims that it doesn't, doesn't change a thing. As far as your next little temper tantrum, sure, I could make up stories just like you do. But I don't need to because God's recorded history works perfectly." "just because you say they [AnswersInGenesis and Kent Hovind] are discredited, means nothing. I can also get scientists to discredit your scientists [Nobel Prize winners from the National Academy of Sciences] and round and round we go. And it seems to me I have also been quoting non-Creation scientists. Oh, but you'll just insult them too and think that you've won. Whatever... Besides, I'll quote God and "trump" any man, group or organization you could ever come up with.
... another reason I think its heretical. The RCC wants nothing more than more money. They aren't out to bring anyone to Christ, only to raise finances to fund the Pope's mansion.
If science is not about proving theories or hypotheses, then why is so much money spent on research to try to prove these previously mentioned theories?? Millions of dollars are spent every year on particle accelerators and slowing down light and speeding up light etc.
How can you deny that as recently as '79, the public school biology text books actually taught that the 'piltdown man' was a 'missing link'? Even the Church of Scientology today still teaches this to be fact!
Atheists are comfy because they don't have a higher being to answer to, and do not have to sacrifice anything that God has asked of them, so atheism is the 'easy' way out. That is until it's time for judgement.
The THEORY of evolution was de-bunked in 1972 and the advent of atomic microscopes. Darwin himself said that is a simpole cel was not simple, had any moving parts, then he himself will claim his theory false.
... we need to keep in mind that the theory of Darwinian evolution was developed to specifically counter the central theological principle of Christianity.
Christianity is the only one that passes 'the logic test.' As hard as you may try, I doubt that you can really show the other religions to be very logical at all. Take Islam for example... Wow, who would want to worship THAT god? Oh, and it has both 'love the Jew' and 'slay the infidels' in the same book. We have the Old Testament, aye, with killing in it, but remember that that was judgement upon the tribes of Caanan that was their own fault... Hinduism:.. they can't even decide who to worship!.. Buddhism: Look at it...yeah. Taoism: Doing nothing is the best way to gain oneness with the tao... Wow, 'go with the flow' at its best... Ask any theoretical physicist about entropy, the proven tendency for the universe to go from order to chaos, and you'll see that this tao is a load of cow... Rastafarianism: Black people rule, kill the whities...
And also God made you fertile and you should not change that intricate part of your body with a chemical [contraceptive]. Surly even as a atheist you would agree that if the ball of cells splitting and splitting with you having no part to play in ended up the way it did, who are you to mess with the gods of science that lye in your body.
I must say I don't approve of racial slurs when used in a nasty fashion, although racial epitaths are very funny in good clean joke form - Irish, German, white, black, whatever... I this case I think you should not have used the words "coon" and "nig," as they are used in a cruel manner. (I posted your post on my board, but I edited out those words.)
And anyone who rejects God's Word (wether Creation or Christ) is being decieved by Satan and drawn away by selfish desires. Satan has a hold over anyone who rejects the truth.
[Replying to (paraphrased) 'Unnatural?! Here are some gay animals']At this time are those lesbian monkeys in China making a legal stand to have their marriage recognized so they can obtain tax and other benefits?
with so much evidence against evolution, or the lack of evidence to support it i could say that evolutionists are unscientific. most evolutionists are remarkably closed minded, more so than creationists. the constant support for evolution even though there has been no tangeble facts to support it for the last 100 years looks closed minded to me.
Atheists are funny when they become offensive. No doubt about it. Atheists are a whole lot more entertaining when they are emotional, obscene and irrational.
Of course I don't really know if the fossils were planted [by God]. I am only using logic to justify my belief in the Bible.
Isn't telling a fictional story, something which isn't real, per definition a lie?
So for me, the jury is out on Jack Chick. At best, he is a guy who has done much to expose the ultimate evil in our world (the Vatican and the forces of Satan in our government).
Have these people even READ the Bible. Sheesh. Peopl are so freakin' stupid!
Science, hmmm.... Most of it is basically theories. How people can believe in theories without any actually proof, I'll never know.
There are many proven miracles. Go into any christian book shop and you will see books testifying to them.
I have never claimed God was proveable. But neither is evolution. If it is, grab yourself a monkey and evolve me a man.
The truth is, evolution has been falsified, creationism is true. Sooner or later, you will figure that out, when your ready to.
I think it is hilarious that you still think that in order to do a detailed study of evolution, you have to read 10 different books on it and take brainwashing classes from a university. Maybe you just like making yourself feel superior to me...who knows...
I will believe my Lord regardless of the evidence stacked against Him...
But what if you are wrong. I know its practically impossible to prove either way, BUT WHAT IF?
[Replying to 'we SEE gravity']no we don't. we see movements of stars. we assume gravity is causing it. why do you assume that?
All objects whose creation has been observed have been man-made, and require design and intelligence. Even a ball of mud requires design and intelligence. We've never observed something being made without design, intelligence, or method."
"It's pretty much a fact that if you ask anybody if they like grapes with seeds or grapes with no seeds better, they will say grapes with no seeds. The way grapes produce is by using feces as fertilizer to spread their seed that is eaten, but if "early man" only ate seedless fruits as a preference (and he spit out all the seeds), how would fruits reproduce in the first place?"
"Humans wear clothes. Scientists are still trying to decipher at how clothes came to be. But the point is, we all wear clothes, but why? Because it's in our "genetic makeup" to wear clothes when it gets cold out? What about in tropical areas? Why not just move there and go naked? Even though people wear less there, they don't go naked. Man is shameful of his nakedness because he discovered it to be that way (Genesis). Also, if man developed his shamefulness of his nakedness over time, how would the species reproduce "millions of years ago", if a man was afraid to be naked in front of a woman?"
"The Creation was directly observed by Adam and Eve
...why did God have to send a flood, it makes sense, if man is getting so advanced for their own good, and you see some of this today, weapons of mass destruction, before something like total anhialation etc happened God interfered.
that would mean that life has no meaning ( peapol shoot thems selfes over this ) in sence there is no devine plan there is no reason to live execpt that of we make our selves - witch means everone hear who bother to learn everting taht they have to fight on this forum - hutt hutt hutt were all stupid we made this up we are aruguing about lies we are not justified but a hier being with a greater under standing greater than our own desier become its own reason and its own justifaction ( in such a world i would hope i never had a daughter execpt to sell her)
whereas nobody has ever seen any sort of proof of the tooth fairy, God has and does reveal Himself to us. i personally have experienced many many many things that are beyond the explaination of science or other religions; God is real and i knowit because i have seen His work.
also, the toothfairy just does not make sense
I wouldn't say that you [atheists] have won, more that you have a view of life which seems to explain everything with pointless flawed arguments, and that you can't accept any answers contradictory to your own opinions.
If ID is ever to be established as a science, it must be established outside of peer review science. IMO, the fact, that peer review science rejects ID should be viewed as an opportunity to develop a form of science superior to peer review science.
if you believe that their isn't any hell, you gotta be apart of some cult or something or just blind as a bat!!
I have no problem with the word "prove", but you evos do have problems with the word "proof"---i.e. you can't provide any. Anybody can provide "evidence", but evidence can be interpreted in different ways, even Darwin admitted that.
Thank you for confessing that evolution hasn't been proven. Exactly what I've been saying all along.
This is yet one more attempt by the scientific establishment to shut down discussion about ID apart from any real debate over its scientific merits. ... That tells me that this entire resolution was ideologically driven.
Being an evilutionist doesn't automaticaly make you a bigot, but it does
make you a bad scientist. God created the world in 6 days 6-10,000
years ago, I know that because the Bible said it, and that settles it.
Man did not come from apes, God formed man in his own image.
All science should be conducted with this in mind.
Against my sanity, I'll respond. The number of people that believe there is no God is infinitesimally small compared to those that do. Therefore, the burden of proof is you.
As it says in Matthew 28, Jesus rose from the dead. Why are you letting satan control your life by trying to insult christians? What proof do you have that He did not ?I beleive that it happened just like the bible says. Try reading the bible again .
more and more it is seeming to be the Evolutionists... [are] just changing the theory again to match what they have found rather than just stopping..... and rather than letting the theory dictate the facts let the facts dictate the theory.
[On the reliability of spectrographic analysis indicating the sun is composed of hydrogen/helium]
Well guess what. When NASA tells me they went to the Sun, I'll still deny them. I highly doubt they have the capability.
The young people who are indoctrinated with the make-believe theory of evolution, which is willfully expanded from the recorded scientific observations of natural selection, will believe in that theory as they believed in Santa Claus, even though there is no direct evidence to prove the theory. The corporate/science controls the belief in the theory by directing funding to favorable projects and complient researchers. They control the publishers and decide what will be written in text books and they thereby control the minds of the populace by controlling what they are allowed to learn. The ultimate aim is the same for controlling Santa Claus. And that aim is money and power. Christmas and corporate/science are two of the largest grossing cash cows that the manipulators possess. In both, money is not the only objective. A corollary to the money is control of society, and that may be as important to the greedy people as the money, for it leaves the mainstream population susceptible to other manipulations. The big problem with such societal manipulations is that it doesn't allow science to advance apace of it's collective human knowledge, but it retards it and, as it's main focus, has it investigating lines of inquiry that are predetermined to return scant knowledge.
[Replying to 'I prefer strong and outspoken women']Then your preference is for women who are disobedient to Scripture.
Actually, he was not being 'unfair' or unjust with them. God is the Creator of the Universe, and as such he is also the owner of everything and everyone in it. Because of this, he is allowed (it is just) for him to do with people as he pleases, and that includes being allowed to kill infants.
If you learn from your parents that apples are purple, and that you beleive the color red is purple and pruple is red, you beleive that it is true.
However, unless you stay at home your whole, in security of your limitations, you will soon find out taht others thik differently and that they infact realized the truth.
[Responding to allegations he wouldn't accept ANY evidence because he's already decided evolution can't be real]
This is true in a way. I am 100% convinced that Jesus Christ was real, I well take God's word over anything scientists put out. Reason being, when we're all in the after life, science well be a faded memory. Something that helped us understand, but is now useless. Why should I bother learning something that well only help on this earth? God does tell us not to focus on this world
The reality is that not only can't scientists prove things 'absolutely,' they can't prove anything period. The selection of one theory as an explanation over another is purely arbitrary.
scientists cant prove the earth to be whatever billion years old can they... but natural disaster like a flood or God simply making the earth look old are much more reasonalbe... Gods pretty old... hes been around for forever...so there